TY - JOUR A1 - Grimm, Volker A1 - Berger, Uta T1 - Robustness analysis: Deconstructing computational models for ecological theory and applications JF - Ecological modelling : international journal on ecological modelling and engineering and systems ecolog N2 - The design of computational models is path-dependent: the choices made in each step during model development constrain the choices that are available in the subsequent steps. The actual path of model development can be extremely different, even for the same system, because the path depends on the question addressed, the availability of data, and the consideration of specific expert knowledge, in addition to the experience, background, and modelling preferences of the modellers. Thus, insights from different models are practically impossible to integrate, which hinders the development of general theory. We therefore suggest augmenting the current culture of communicating models as working just fine with a culture of presenting analyses in which we try to break models, i.e., model mechanisms explaining certain observations break down. We refer to the systematic attempts to break a model as “robustness analysis” (RA). RA is the systematic deconstruction of a model by forcefully changing the model's parameters, structure, and representation of processes. We discuss the nature and elements of RA and provide brief examples. RA cannot be completely formalized into specific techniques and instead corresponds to detective work that is driven by general questions and specific hypotheses, with strong attention focused on unusual behaviours. Both individual modellers and ecological modelling in general will benefit from RA because RA helps with understanding models and identifying “robust theories”, which are general principles that are independent of the idiosyncrasies of specific models. Integrating the results of RAs from different models to address certain systems or questions will then provide a comprehensive overview of when certain mechanisms control system behaviour and when and why this control ceases. This approach can provide insights into the mechanisms that lead to regime shifts in actual ecological systems. KW - Sensitivity analysis KW - Ecological theory KW - Computational modelling KW - Robustness KW - Model analysis KW - Understanding Y1 - 2016 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.07.018 SN - 0304-3800 SN - 1872-7026 VL - 326 SP - 162 EP - 167 PB - Elsevier CY - Amsterdam ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kupetz, Maxi T1 - Empathy displays as interactional achievements-Multimodal and sequential aspects JF - Journal of pragmatics : an interdisciplinary journal of language studies KW - Empathy KW - Understanding KW - Affectivity KW - Conversation Analysis KW - Interactional Linguistics KW - Multimodality Y1 - 2014 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.006 SN - 0378-2166 SN - 1879-1387 VL - 61 SP - 4 EP - 34 PB - Elsevier CY - Amsterdam ER - TY - THES A1 - Doyle, Timothy F. T1 - The role of context in meaning and understanding T1 - Die Rolle des Kontextes für Bedeutung und Verständnis N2 - In this work the concept of 'context' is considered in five main points. First, context is seen as always necessary for an adequate explication of the concepts of meaning and understanding. Context always plays a role and is not merely brought into consideration when handling a special class of statements or terms, or when there is doubt and clarification is necessary. Second, context cannot be completely reduced to some system of representation. The reason for this is the presence of humans, which is always an important component of a context. Humans experience situations in ways that are not always reducible to symbolic representation. Third, contexts are in principle open. In normal cases they cannot be determined or described in advance. A context is not to be equated with a set of information. Fourth, we understand the parameters of a context pragmatically, which is why we are not led into doubt or even to meaning skepticism by the open nature of a context. This pragmatic knowledge belongs to the category of an ability. Fifth, contexts are, in principle, accessible. This denies the idea that some contexts are incommensurable. There are a number of pragmatic ways of accessing unfamiliar contexts. Some of these are here examined in light of the so-called 'culture wars' in the U.S.A. N2 - Der Kontextbegriff wird so betrachtet, dass es in fünf Hauptpunkte untergliedert wird. Erstens: der Kontextbegriff ist für eine Explikation der Begriff die Bedeutung und des Verstehens immer notwendig. Der Kontext spielt immer eine Rolle und ist nicht nur für Fälle gut, in denen eine besondere Klasse von Wörtern behandelt wird, oder in denen Zweifel bestehen und eine Klarstellung benötigt wird. Zweitens: der Kontextbegriff lässt sich nicht vollständig auf eine Art von Repräsentation reduzieren. Grund dafür ist das Vorhandensein von Menschen, was immer ein wichtiger Bestandteil des Kontextes ist. Drittens: Kontexte sind grundsätzlich offen. Sie können nicht im Normalfall in vorbestimmter Art und Weise eingegrenzt oder beschrieben werden. Viertens: wir verstehen die Parameter eines Kontextes nach pragmatischer Art und Weise, daher führt uns die offene Natur eines Kontextes nicht zur epistemischen Zweifeln oder sogar Bedeutungsskeptizismus. Dieses pragmatische Wissen gehört in eine völlig andere Kategorie; die eine Fähigkeit ist. Fünftens: Kontexte sind prinzipiell zugänglich. Dies lehnt eine These der Inkommensurabilität zwischen Kontexte ab. Es gibt verschiedene pragmatishce Wege, um Zugang zu fremden Kontexte zu erreichen. Die sogenannte 'culure wars' in den U.S.A. werden hier als Beispiel bennant. KW - Kontext KW - Wittgenstein KW - Bedeutung KW - Verstehen KW - Context KW - Wittgenstein KW - Meaning KW - Understanding Y1 - 2007 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-20691 ER -