TY - CHAP A1 - Krause, Hannes-Vincent A1 - Große Deters, Fenne A1 - Baumann, Annika T1 - The envy spiral BT - unraveling the black box of social media positivityorganizations T2 - Proceedings of the 28th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS) : ECIS 2020 Research-in-Progress Papers N2 - On Social Networking Sites (SNS) users disclose mostly positive and often self-enhancing information. Scholars refer to this phenomenon as the positivity bias in SNS communication (PBSC). However, while theoretical explanations for this phenomenon have been proposed, an empirical proof of these theorized mechanisms is still missing. The project presented in this Research-in-Progress paper aims at explaining the PBSC with the mechanism specified in the self-enhancement envy spiral. Specifically, we hypothesize that feelings of envy drive people to post positive and self-enhancing content on SNS. To test this hypothesis, we developed an experimental design allowing to examine the causal effect of envy on the positivity of users’ subsequently posted content. In a preliminary study, we tested our manipulation of envy and could show its effectiveness in inducing different levels of envy between our groups. Our project will help to broaden the understanding of the complex dynamics of SNS and the potentially adverse driving forces underlying them. Y1 - 2020 UR - https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2020_rip/68 SN - 978-1-7336325-1-5 PB - AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) CY - [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar] ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Köster, Antonia A1 - Baumann, Annika A1 - Krasnova, Hanna A1 - Avital, Michel A1 - Lyytinen, Kalle A1 - Rossi, Matti T1 - Panel 1: to share or not to share BT - should is researchers share or hoard their precious data? T2 - Proceedings of the 28th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS): ECIS 2020 Panels N2 - Data sharing requires researchers to publish their (primary) data and any supporting research materials. With increased attention on reproducibility and more transparent research requiring sharing of data, the issues surrounding data sharing are moving beyond whether data sharing is beneficial, to what kind of research data should be shared and how. However, despite its benefits, data sharing still is not common practice in Information Systems (IS) research. The panel seeks to discuss the controversies related to data sharing in research, specifically focusing on the IS discipline. It remains unclear how the positive effects of data sharing that are often framed as extending beyond the individual researcher (e.g., openness for innovation) can be utilized while reducing the downsides often associated with negative consequences for the individual researcher (e.g., losing a competitive advantage). To foster data sharing practices in IS, the panel will address this dilemma by drawing on the panelists’ expertise. Y1 - 2020 UR - https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2020_panels/3 PB - AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) CY - [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar] ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Risius, Marten A1 - Baumann, Annika A1 - Krasnova, Hanna T1 - Developing a new paradigm BT - introducing the intention-behaviour gap to the privacy paradox phenomenon T2 - Proceedings of the 28th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS) : ECIS 2020 Research Papers N2 - Internet users commonly agree that it is important for them to protect their personal data. However, the same users readily disclose their data when requested by an online service. The dichotomy between privacy attitude and actual behaviour is commonly referred to as the “privacy paradox”. Over twenty years of research were not able to provide one comprehensive explanation for the paradox and seems even further from providing actual means to overcome the paradox. We argue that the privacy paradox is not just an instantiation of the attitude-behaviour gap. Instead, we introduce a new paradigm explaining the paradox as the result of attitude-intention and intentionbehaviour gaps. Historically, motivational goal-setting psychologists addressed the issue of intentionbehaviour gaps in terms of the Rubicon Model of Action Phases and argued that commitment and volitional strength are an essential mechanism that fuel intentions and translate them into action. Thus, in this study we address the privacy paradox from a motivational psychological perspective by developing two interventions on Facebook and assess whether the 287 participants of our online experiment actually change their privacy behaviour. The results demonstrate the presence of an intentionbehaviour gap and the efficacy of our interventions in reducing the privacy paradox. KW - privacy paradox KW - intention-behaviour gap KW - attitude-behaviour gap KW - commitment KW - rubicon model KW - social media Y1 - 2020 UR - https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2020_rp/150 UR - https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341507497_Developing_a_New_Paradigm_Introducing_the_Intention-Behaviour_Gap_to_the_Privacy_Paradox_Phenomenon/link/5ec4a1c892851c11a8778d3f/download?_tp=eyJjb250ZXh0Ijp7InBhZ2UiOiJwdWJsaWNhdGlvbiIsInByZXZpb3VzUGFnZSI6bnVsbH19 PB - AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) CY - [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar] ER -