TY  - JOUR
A1  - Mueller, Steffen
A1  - Engel, Tilman
A1  - Müller, Juliane
A1  - Stoll, Josefine
A1  - Baur, Heiner
A1  - Mayer, Frank
T1  - Sensorimotor exercises and enhanced trunk function
BT  - a randomized controlled trial
JF  - International journal of sports medicine
N2  - The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a 6-week sensorimotor or resistance training on maximum trunk strength and response to sudden, high-intensity loading in athletes. Interventions showed no significant difference for maximum strength in concentric and eccentric testing (p>0.05). For perturbation compensation, higher peak torque response following SMT (Extension: +24Nm 95%CI +/- 19Nm; Rotation: + 19Nm 95%CI +/- 13Nm) and RT (Extension: +35Nm 95%CI +/- 16Nm; Rotation: +5Nm 95%CI +/- 4Nm) compared to CG (Extension: -4Nm 95%CI +/- 16Nm; Rotation: -2Nm 95%CI +/- 4Nm) was present (p<0.05).
KW  - core
KW  - training intervention
KW  - prevention
KW  - perturbation
KW  - MiSpEx*
Y1  - 2018
U6  - https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0592-7286
SN  - 0172-4622
SN  - 1439-3964
VL  - 39
IS  - 7
SP  - 555
EP  - 563
PB  - Thieme
CY  - Stuttgart
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Müller, Juliane
A1  - Müller, Steffen
A1  - Stoll, Josefine
A1  - Rector, Michael V.
A1  - Baur, Heiner
A1  - Mayer, Frank
T1  - Influence of Load on Three-Dimensional Segmental Trunk Kinematics in One-Handed Lifting: A Pilot Study
JF  - Journal of applied biomechanics
N2  - Stability of the trunk is relevant in determining trunk response to different loading in everyday tasks initiated by the limbs. Descriptions of the trunk’s mechanical movement patterns in response to different loads while lifting objects are still under debate. Hence, the aim of this study was to analyze the influence of weight on 3-dimensional segmental motion of the trunk during 1-handed lifting. Ten asymptomatic subjects were included (29 ± 3 y; 1.79 ± 0.09 m; 75 ± 14 kg). Subjects lifted 3× a light and heavy load from the ground up onto a table. Three-dimensional segmental trunk motion was measured (12 markers; 3 segments: upper thoracic area [UTA], lower thoracic area [LTA], lumbar area [LA]). Outcomes were total motion amplitudes (ROM;[°]) for anterior flexion, lateral flexion, and rotation of each segment. The highest ROM was observed in the LTA segment (anterior flexion), and the smallest ROM in the UTA segment (lateral flexion). ROM differed for all planes between the 3 segments for both tasks (P < .001). There were no differences in ROM between light and heavy loads (P > .05). No interaction effects (load × segment) were observed, as ROM did not reveal differences between loading tasks. Regardless of weight, the 3 segments did reflect differences, supporting the relevance of multisegmental analysis.
KW  - trunk motion
KW  - kinematic trunk model
KW  - everyday task
KW  - MiSpEx*
Y1  - 2016
U6  - https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2015-0227
SN  - 1065-8483
SN  - 1543-2688
VL  - 32
SP  - 520
EP  - 525
PB  - Human Kinetics Publ.
CY  - Champaign
ER  -