TY - THES A1 - Schnjakin, Maxim T1 - Cloud-RAID BT - eine Methode zur Bereitstellung zuverlässiger Speicherressourcen in öffentlichen Clouds Y1 - 2014 ER - TY - THES A1 - Gericke, Lutz T1 - Tele-Board - Supporting and analyzing creative collaboration in synchronous and asynchronous scenario Y1 - 2014 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Schick, Daniel A1 - Bojahr, Andre A1 - Herzog, Marc A1 - Shayduk, Roman A1 - von Korff Schmising, Clemens A1 - Bargheer, Matias T1 - Udkm1Dsim-A simulation toolkit for 1D ultrafast dynamics in condensed matter JF - Computer physics communications : an international journal devoted to computational physics and computer programs in physics N2 - The UDKM1DSIM toolbox is a collection of MATLAB (MathWorks Inc.) classes and routines to simulate the structural dynamics and the according X-ray diffraction response in one-dimensional crystalline sample structures upon an arbitrary time-dependent external stimulus, e.g. an ultrashort laser pulse. The toolbox provides the capabilities to define arbitrary layered structures on the atomic level including a rich database of corresponding element-specific physical properties. The excitation of ultrafast dynamics is represented by an N-temperature model which is commonly applied for ultrafast optical excitations. Structural dynamics due to thermal stress are calculated by a linear-chain model of masses and springs. The resulting X-ray diffraction response is computed by dynamical X-ray theory. The UDKM1DSIM toolbox is highly modular and allows for introducing user-defined results at any step in the simulation procedure. Program summary Program title: udkm1Dsim Catalogue identifier: AERH_v1_0 Program summary URL: http://cpc.cs.qub.ac.uk/summaries/AERH_v1_0.html Licensing provisions: BSD No. of lines in distributed program, including test data, etc.: 130221 No. of bytes in distributed program, including test data, etc.: 2746036 Distribution format: tar.gz Programming language: Matlab (MathWorks Inc.). Computer: PC/Workstation. Operating system: Running Matlab installation required (tested on MS Win XP -7, Ubuntu Linux 11.04-13.04). Has the code been vectorized or parallelized?: Parallelization for dynamical XRD computations. Number of processors used: 1-12 for Matlab Parallel Computing Toolbox; 1 - infinity for Matlab Distributed Computing Toolbox External routines: Optional: Matlab Parallel Computing Toolbox, Matlab Distributed Computing Toolbox Required (included in the package): mtimesx Fast Matrix Multiply for Matlab by James Tursa, xml io tools by Jaroslaw Tuszynski, textprogressbar by Paul Proteus Nature of problem: Simulate the lattice dynamics of 1D crystalline sample structures due to an ultrafast excitation including thermal transport and compute the corresponding transient X-ray diffraction pattern. Solution method: Restrictions: The program is restricted to 1D sample structures and is further limited to longitudinal acoustic phonon modes and symmetrical X-ray diffraction geometries. Unusual features: The program is highly modular and allows the inclusion of user-defined inputs at any time of the simulation procedure. Running time: The running time is highly dependent on the number of unit cells in the sample structure and other simulation parameters such as time span or angular grid for X-ray diffraction computations. However, the example files are computed in approx. 1-5 min each on a 8 Core Processor with 16 GB RAM available. KW - Ultrafast dynamics KW - Heat diffusion KW - N-temperature model KW - Coherent phonons KW - Incoherent phonons KW - Thermoelasticity KW - Dynamical X-ray theory Y1 - 2014 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2013.10.009 SN - 0010-4655 SN - 1879-2944 VL - 185 IS - 2 SP - 651 EP - 660 PB - Elsevier CY - Amsterdam ER - TY - THES A1 - Lindauer, T. Marius T1 - Algorithm selection, scheduling and configuration of Boolean constraint solvers N2 - Boolean constraint solving technology has made tremendous progress over the last decade, leading to industrial-strength solvers, for example, in the areas of answer set programming (ASP), the constraint satisfaction problem (CSP), propositional satisfiability (SAT) and satisfiability of quantified Boolean formulas (QBF). However, in all these areas, there exist multiple solving strategies that work well on different applications; no strategy dominates all other strategies. Therefore, no individual solver shows robust state-of-the-art performance in all kinds of applications. Additionally, the question arises how to choose a well-performing solving strategy for a given application; this is a challenging question even for solver and domain experts. One way to address this issue is the use of portfolio solvers, that is, a set of different solvers or solver configurations. We present three new automatic portfolio methods: (i) automatic construction of parallel portfolio solvers (ACPP) via algorithm configuration,(ii) solving the $NP$-hard problem of finding effective algorithm schedules with Answer Set Programming (aspeed), and (iii) a flexible algorithm selection framework (claspfolio2) allowing for fair comparison of different selection approaches. All three methods show improved performance and robustness in comparison to individual solvers on heterogeneous instance sets from many different applications. Since parallel solvers are important to effectively solve hard problems on parallel computation systems (e.g., multi-core processors), we extend all three approaches to be effectively applicable in parallel settings. We conducted extensive experimental studies different instance sets from ASP, CSP, MAXSAT, Operation Research (OR), SAT and QBF that indicate an improvement in the state-of-the-art solving heterogeneous instance sets. Last but not least, from our experimental studies, we deduce practical advice regarding the question when to apply which of our methods. N2 - Bool'sche Solver Technologie machte enormen Fortschritt im letzten Jahrzehnt, was beispielsweise zu industrie-relevanten Solvern auf der Basis von Antwortmengenprogrammierung (ASP), dem Constraint Satisfcation Problem (CSP), dem Erfüllbarkeitsproblem für aussagenlogische Formeln (SAT) und dem Erfüllbarkeitsproblem für quantifizierte boolesche Formeln (QBF) führte. Allerdings gibt es in all diesen Bereichen verschiedene Lösungsstrategien, welche bei verschiedenen Anwendungen unterschiedlich effizient sind. Dabei gibt es keine einzelne Strategie, die alle anderen Strategien dominiert. Das führt dazu, dass es keinen robusten Solver für das Lösen von allen möglichen Anwendungsprobleme gibt. Die Wahl der richtigen Strategie für eine neue Anwendung ist eine herausforderne Problemstellung selbst für Solver- und Anwendungsexperten. Eine Möglichkeit, um Solver robuster zu machen, sind Portfolio-Ansätze. Wir stellen drei automatisch einsetzbare Portfolio-Ansätze vor: (i) automatische Konstruktion von parallelen Portfolio-Solvern (ACPP) mit Algorithmen-Konfiguration, (ii) das Lösen des $NP$-harten Problems zur Algorithmen-Ablaufplanung (aspeed) mit ASP, und (iii) ein flexibles Algorithmen-Selektionsframework (claspfolio2), was viele Techniken von Algorithmen-Selektion parametrisiert implementiert und eine faire Vergleichbarkeit zwischen Ihnen erlaubt. Alle drei Methoden verbessern die Robustheit des Solvingprozesses für heterogenen Instanzmengen bestehend aus unterschiedlichsten Anwendungsproblemen. Parallele Solver sind zunehmend der Schlüssel zum effektiven Lösen auf multi-core Maschinen. Daher haben wir all unsere Ansätze auch für den Einsatz auf parallelen Architekturen erweitert. Umfangreiche Experimente auf ASP, CSP, MAXSAT, Operation Research (OR), SAT und QBF zeigen, dass der Stand der Technik durch verbesserte Performanz auf heterogenen Instanzmengen verbessert wurde. Auf Grundlage dieser Experimente leiten wir auch Ratschläge ab, in welchen Anwendungsszenarien welches unserer Verfahren angewendet werden sollte. T2 - Algorithmen-Selektion, -Ablaufplanung und -Konfiguration von Bool'schen Constraint Solvern KW - algorithm configuration KW - algorithm scheduling KW - algorithm selection KW - parallel solving KW - Boolean constraint solver KW - Algorithmenselektion KW - Algorithmenablaufplanung KW - Algorithmenkonfiguration KW - paralleles Lösen Y1 - 2014 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-71260 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Hoos, Holger A1 - Lindauer, Marius A1 - Schaub, Torsten T1 - claspfolio 2 BT - advances in algorithm selection for answer set programming JF - Theory and practice of logic programming N2 - Building on the award-winning, portfolio-based ASP solver claspfolio, we present claspfolio 2, a modular and open solver architecture that integrates several different portfolio-based algorithm selection approaches and techniques. The claspfolio 2 solver framework supports various feature generators, solver selection approaches, solver portfolios, as well as solver-schedule-based pre-solving techniques. The default configuration of claspfolio 2 relies on a light-weight version of the ASP solver clasp to generate static and dynamic instance features. The flexible open design of claspfolio 2 is a distinguishing factor even beyond ASP. As such, it provides a unique framework for comparing and combining existing portfolio-based algorithm selection approaches and techniques in a single, unified framework. Taking advantage of this, we conducted an extensive experimental study to assess the impact of different feature sets, selection approaches and base solver portfolios. In addition to gaining substantial insights into the utility of the various approaches and techniques, we identified a default configuration of claspfolio 2 that achieves substantial performance gains not only over clasp's default configuration and the earlier version of claspfolio, but also over manually tuned configurations of clasp. Y1 - 2014 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1017/S1471068414000210 SN - 1471-0684 SN - 1475-3081 VL - 14 SP - 569 EP - 585 PB - Cambridge Univ. Press CY - New York ER - TY - THES A1 - Videla, Santiago T1 - Reasoning on the response of logical signaling networks with answer set programming T1 - Modellierung Logischer Signalnetzwerke mittels Antwortmengenprogrammierung N2 - Deciphering the functioning of biological networks is one of the central tasks in systems biology. In particular, signal transduction networks are crucial for the understanding of the cellular response to external and internal perturbations. Importantly, in order to cope with the complexity of these networks, mathematical and computational modeling is required. We propose a computational modeling framework in order to achieve more robust discoveries in the context of logical signaling networks. More precisely, we focus on modeling the response of logical signaling networks by means of automated reasoning using Answer Set Programming (ASP). ASP provides a declarative language for modeling various knowledge representation and reasoning problems. Moreover, available ASP solvers provide several reasoning modes for assessing the multitude of answer sets. Therefore, leveraging its rich modeling language and its highly efficient solving capacities, we use ASP to address three challenging problems in the context of logical signaling networks: learning of (Boolean) logical networks, experimental design, and identification of intervention strategies. Overall, the contribution of this thesis is three-fold. Firstly, we introduce a mathematical framework for characterizing and reasoning on the response of logical signaling networks. Secondly, we contribute to a growing list of successful applications of ASP in systems biology. Thirdly, we present a software providing a complete pipeline for automated reasoning on the response of logical signaling networks. N2 - Deciphering the functioning of biological networks is one of the central tasks in systems biology. In particular, signal transduction networks are crucial for the understanding of the cellular response to external and internal perturbations. Importantly, in order to cope with the complexity of these networks, mathematical and computational modeling is required. We propose a computational modeling framework in order to achieve more robust discoveries in the context of logical signaling networks. More precisely, we focus on modeling the response of logical signaling networks by means of automated reasoning using Answer Set Programming (ASP). ASP provides a declarative language for modeling various knowledge representation and reasoning problems. Moreover, available ASP solvers provide several reasoning modes for assessing the multitude of answer sets. Therefore, leveraging its rich modeling language and its highly efficient solving capacities, we use ASP to address three challenging problems in the context of logical signaling networks: learning of (Boolean) logical networks, experimental design, and identification of intervention strategies. Overall, the contribution of this thesis is three-fold. Firstly, we introduce a mathematical framework for characterizing and reasoning on the response of logical signaling networks. Secondly, we contribute to a growing list of successful applications of ASP in systems biology. Thirdly, we present a software providing a complete pipeline for automated reasoning on the response of logical signaling networks. KW - Systembiologie KW - logische Signalnetzwerke KW - Antwortmengenprogrammierung KW - systems biology KW - logical signaling networks KW - answer set programming Y1 - 2014 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-71890 ER -