TY - JOUR A1 - Schurr, Frank Martin A1 - Pagel, Jörn A1 - Sarmento, Juliano Sarmento A1 - Groeneveld, Juergen A1 - Bykova, Olga A1 - O'Hara, Robert B. A1 - Hartig, Florian A1 - Kissling, W. Daniel A1 - Linder, H. Peter A1 - Midgley, Guy F. A1 - Schröder-Esselbach, Boris A1 - Singer, Alexander A1 - Zimmermann, Niklaus E. T1 - How to understand species' niches and range dynamics: a demographic research agenda for biogeography JF - Journal of biogeography N2 - Range dynamics causes mismatches between a species geographical distribution and the set of suitable environments in which population growth is positive (the Hutchinsonian niche). This is because sourcesink population dynamics cause species to occupy unsuitable environments, and because environmental change creates non-equilibrium situations in which species may be absent from suitable environments (due to migration limitation) or present in unsuitable environments that were previously suitable (due to time-delayed extinction). Because correlative species distribution models do not account for these processes, they are likely to produce biased niche estimates and biased forecasts of future range dynamics. Recently developed dynamic range models (DRMs) overcome this problem: they statistically estimate both range dynamics and the underlying environmental response of demographic rates from species distribution data. This process-based statistical approach qualitatively advances biogeographical analyses. Yet, the application of DRMs to a broad range of species and study systems requires substantial research efforts in statistical modelling, empirical data collection and ecological theory. Here we review current and potential contributions of these fields to a demographic understanding of niches and range dynamics. Our review serves to formulate a demographic research agenda that entails: (1) advances in incorporating process-based models of demographic responses and range dynamics into a statistical framework, (2) systematic collection of data on temporal changes in distribution and abundance and on the response of demographic rates to environmental variation, and (3) improved theoretical understanding of the scaling of demographic rates and the dynamics of spatially coupled populations. This demographic research agenda is challenging but necessary for improved comprehension and quantification of niches and range dynamics. It also forms the basis for understanding how niches and range dynamics are shaped by evolutionary dynamics and biotic interactions. Ultimately, the demographic research agenda should lead to deeper integration of biogeography with empirical and theoretical ecology. KW - Biodiversity monitoring KW - climate change KW - ecological forecasts KW - ecological niche modelling KW - ecological theory KW - geographical range shifts KW - global environmental change KW - mechanistic models KW - migration KW - process-based statistics Y1 - 2012 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2012.02737.x SN - 0305-0270 VL - 39 IS - 12 SP - 2146 EP - 2162 PB - Wiley-Blackwell CY - Hoboken ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kramer-Schadt, Stephanie A1 - Niedballa, Jürgen A1 - Pilgrim, John D. A1 - Schröder-Esselbach, Boris A1 - Lindenborn, Jana A1 - Reinfelder, Vanessa A1 - Stillfried, Milena A1 - Heckmann, Ilja A1 - Scharf, Anne K. A1 - Augeri, Dave M. A1 - Cheyne, Susan M. A1 - Hearn, Andrew J. A1 - Ross, Joanna A1 - Macdonald, David W. A1 - Mathai, John A1 - Eaton, James A1 - Marshall, Andrew J. A1 - Semiadi, Gono A1 - Rustam, Rustam A1 - Bernard, Henry A1 - Alfred, Raymond A1 - Samejima, Hiromitsu A1 - Duckworth, J. W. A1 - Breitenmoser-Wuersten, Christine A1 - Belant, Jerrold L. A1 - Hofer, Heribert A1 - Wilting, Andreas T1 - The importance of correcting for sampling bias in MaxEnt species distribution models JF - Diversity & distributions : a journal of biological invasions and biodiversity N2 - AimAdvancement in ecological methods predicting species distributions is a crucial precondition for deriving sound management actions. Maximum entropy (MaxEnt) models are a popular tool to predict species distributions, as they are considered able to cope well with sparse, irregularly sampled data and minor location errors. Although a fundamental assumption of MaxEnt is that the entire area of interest has been systematically sampled, in practice, MaxEnt models are usually built from occurrence records that are spatially biased towards better-surveyed areas. Two common, yet not compared, strategies to cope with uneven sampling effort are spatial filtering of occurrence data and background manipulation using environmental data with the same spatial bias as occurrence data. We tested these strategies using simulated data and a recently collated dataset on Malay civet Viverra tangalunga in Borneo. LocationBorneo, Southeast Asia. MethodsWe collated 504 occurrence records of Malay civets from Borneo of which 291 records were from 2001 to 2011 and used them in the MaxEnt analysis (baseline scenario) together with 25 environmental input variables. We simulated datasets for two virtual species (similar to a range-restricted highland and a lowland species) using the same number of records for model building. As occurrence records were biased towards north-eastern Borneo, we investigated the efficacy of spatial filtering versus background manipulation to reduce overprediction or underprediction in specific areas. ResultsSpatial filtering minimized omission errors (false negatives) and commission errors (false positives). We recommend that when sample size is insufficient to allow spatial filtering, manipulation of the background dataset is preferable to not correcting for sampling bias, although predictions were comparatively weak and commission errors increased. Main ConclusionsWe conclude that a substantial improvement in the quality of model predictions can be achieved if uneven sampling effort is taken into account, thereby improving the efficacy of species conservation planning. KW - Borneo KW - carnivora KW - conservation planning KW - ecological niche modelling KW - maximum entropy (MaxEnt) KW - sampling bias KW - Southeast Asia KW - species distribution modelling KW - viverridae Y1 - 2013 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12096 SN - 1366-9516 SN - 1472-4642 VL - 19 IS - 11 SP - 1366 EP - 1379 PB - Wiley-Blackwell CY - Hoboken ER -