TY - RPRT A1 - Petersen, Hans-Georg T1 - Steuern in Fragilen Staaten BT - Empfehlungen für die Entwicklungszusammenarbeit T2 - Finanzwissenschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge N2 - Fragile states are characterized by institutions which do not have the political will or ability to reduce poverty in the interests of their citizen, to establish basic social security, to promote a successful development process, and to guarantee security and human rights. The regional disintegration processes after the period of imperialism and the fall of the iron curtain have created many new states, which still are politically unstable and unable for a sustainable development. In the literature such states are describes as "weak", "failing or failed", "collapsed", "conflict or post-conflict" - dependant on the extent of the particular state failure. Several indicators try to describe such states and partly allow for projections of the future development. Then the role of taxation is discussed in detail before recommendations for the development cooperation are presented. Obviously taxation plays a key role for the democratization process in fragile states. T3 - Finanzwissenschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge - 61 KW - fragile state KW - state theory KW - stable states KW - fragility index KW - taxation KW - shadow economy KW - tax administration KW - development cooperation Y1 - 2010 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-48465 SN - 1864-1431 SN - 0948-7549 IS - 61 ER - TY - RPRT ED - Petersen, Hans-Georg T1 - Tax systems and tax harmonisation in the East African Community (EAC) T2 - Finanzwissenschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge N2 - In the first part of the report of the GTZ expert group an overview on the basics of integration and tax harmonisation within a common market is given. Chapter II. concentrates on the problems of national and international tax law regarding double taxation before the harmonisation process within the EU is described in detail. This process is not a best practice example but at least the experiences made in the course of the last five decades are interesting enough and might contribute important information for regions, which more or less recently have started a similar endeavour. The harmonisation needs are discussed for value added taxation (VAT), excise taxation, and income taxation. The problems of tax administrations, procedures laws, taxpayers’ rights and obligations as well as tax compliance are also taken into consideration. The second part of the study reviews the national tax systems within the EAC member countries. Before the single taxes are described in more detail, the macroeconomic situation is illuminated by some basic figures and the current stand of the inner-community integration analysed. Then the single tax bases and tax rates are confronted to shed some light on the necessities for the development of a common market within the near future. Again the value added tax laws, excise taxes and income taxes are discussed in detail, while regarding the latter the focus is on company taxation. For a better systematic analysis the national tax laws are confronted within an overview. The chapter is closed with a summary of the tax rates applied and a rough estimation of the tax burdens within the Partner States. The third part of this report contains the policy recommendations of the expert group following the same structures as the chapters before and presenting the results for the VAT, the excises and the corporate income tax (CIT). Additionally the requirements for tax procedures and administration as well as problems of transparency and information exchange are discussed in detail before the strategic recommendations are derived in close relation to the experiences made within the EU harmonisation process. The recommendations are based on the following normative arguments: (1) Tax harmonisation is a basic requirement for economic integration. (2) Equality of taxation is an imperative of tax justice and demands the avoidance of double taxation as well as the combat of tax evasion and corruption. (3) The avoidance of harmful tax competition between the Partner States. (4) The strengthening of taxpayers’ rights in tax procedures. Hence, all kinds of income, goods and services should be taxed once and only once. T3 - Finanzwissenschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge - 60 KW - centralization KW - decentralization KW - ethnic differences KW - fiscal federalism KW - fiscal planning KW - good governance KW - harmonization KW - integration KW - nation building KW - revenue sharing KW - sustainable fiscal policy KW - tax reform KW - compliance KW - corruption KW - direct taxes KW - double taxation KW - East African Community KW - indirect taxes KW - information exchange KW - international tax law KW - revenue authorities KW - tax administration KW - taxation KW - tax harmonization KW - tax system KW - transparency Y1 - 2010 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-44693 SN - 1864-1431 SN - 0948-7549 IS - 60 ER - TY - THES A1 - Williges, Esther S. G. T1 - Steuerverwaltung in Polen : eine europäische Verwaltung? [vollständige Fassung] T1 - Tax administration in Poland : a European administration? N2 - Die Arbeit geht der Frage nach, ob man die Steuerverwaltung in Polen als europäische Verwaltung bezeichnen kann. Es werden drei Aspekte vertiefend untersucht: 1.Verortung der polnischen Steuerverwaltung in der OECD und ausgewählten Nicht-OECD-Ländern mittels einer Clusteranalyse auf Grundlage verschiedener Daten zum Aufbau, Aufgabenprofil und zur Performanz unter gleichzeitiger Beachtung der möglichen Abzeichnung eines europäischen Steuerverwaltungsraums; 2.Verbreitung des CAF in den Steuerverwaltungen der MOE-8, insbesondere in Polen, als vom EUPAN unterstütztes Qualitätsmanagementsystem, das geeignet erscheint, die Entstehung eines gemeinsamen europäischen Qualitätsverständnisses zu fördern; 3.Wahrnehmung der polnischen Steuerverwaltung durch deutsche Finanzbeamte erhoben mit Hilfe eines semantischen Differentials. Die Clusteranalyse ergibt keinen Hinweis auf einen einheitlichen europäischen Steuerverwaltungsraum in Abgrenzung von den übrigen einbezogenen Staaten. Polen fällt nicht als Ausreißer auf und weist Ähnlichkeiten zu anderen europäischen Ländern auf. In Steuerverwaltungen lässt sich das CAF so gut wie gar nicht finden. Polen bildet in der Hinsicht eine Ausnahme. Allerdings befindet sich die polnische Steuerverwaltung auf einem europäischen Weg, den andere Sektoren der Verwaltung (auch in MOE-8) bereits vielfach beschritten haben. Aus der Untersuchung des Images der polnischen Steuerverwaltung bei deutschen Finanzbeamten geht die Abwesenheit starker negativer Stereotype hervor. Die Einschätzungen sind sehr zurückhaltend in der Nähe des Mittelwertes zwischen den beiden Polen des semantischen Differentials. Das vorläufige Ergebnis lautet: Die Steuerverwaltung in Polen ist eine europäische Verwaltung. N2 - This thesis discusses the question, if the Polish tax administration can be called a European administration. Three aspects are analysed: 1.Placement of the Polish tax administration among OECD and selected non-OECD countries by means of a cluster analysis based on various data concerning structure, tasks and performance with special attention to the emergence of a European administrative space of tax administrations; 2.Spread of the CAF among the tax administrations of CEE-8, especially in Poland, as quality management system supported by the EUPAN, that seems suitable to enhance the emergence of a common European unterstanding of quality; 3.Perception of the Polish tax administration by German tax collectors gathered with a semantic differential. The cluster analysis does not hint at a uniform European administrative space of tax administrations separated from the other included countries. Poland does not stand out as an outlier and shows similarities to other European countries. Hardly can the CAF be found in tax administrations. Poland is an exception. But the Polish tax administration is on a European path, which the other sectors of administration (also in CEE-8) have already followed in many cases. The absence of strong negative stereotypes among German tax collectors is a result of the analysis of the image of the Polish tax administration. The assessment is diffident near the mean value between the two poles of the semantic differential. The preliminary result is: The Polish tax administration is a European administration. KW - Polen KW - Steuerverwaltung KW - Europäisierung KW - Clusteranalyse KW - Polaritätsprofil KW - Poland KW - tax administration KW - Europeanization KW - cluster analysis KW - semantic differential Y1 - 2008 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-33877 ER -