TY - THES A1 - Staubitz, Thomas T1 - Gradable team assignments in large scale learning environments BT - collaborative learning, teamwork, and peer assessment in MOOCs BT - Kollaboratives Lernen, Teamarbeit und Peer Assessment in MOOCs N2 - Lifelong learning plays an increasingly important role in many societies. Technology is changing faster than ever and what has been important to learn today, may be obsolete tomorrow. The role of informal programs is becoming increasingly important. Particularly, Massive Open Online Courses have become popular among learners and instructors. In 2008, a group of Canadian education enthusiasts started the first Massive Open Online Courses or MOOCs to prove their cognitive theory of Connectivism. Around 2012, a variety of American start-ups redefined the concept of MOOCs. Instead of following the connectivist doctrine they returned to a more traditional approach. They focussed on video lecturing and combined this with a course forum that allowed the participants to discuss with each other and the teaching team. While this new version of the concept was enormously successful in terms of massiveness—hundreds of thousands of participants from all over the world joined the first of these courses—many educators criticized the re-lapse to the cognitivist model. In the early days, the evolving platforms often did not have more features than a video player, simple multiple-choice quizzes, and the course forum. It soon became a major interest of research to allow the scaling of more modern approaches of learning and teaching for the massiveness of these courses. Hands-on exercises, alternative forms of assessment, collaboration, and teamwork are some of the topics on the agenda. The insights provided by cognitive and pedagogical theories, however, do not necessarily always run in sync with the needs and the preferences of the majority of participants. While the former promote action-learning, hands-on-learning, competence-based-learning, project-based-learning, team-based-learning as the holy grail, many of the latter often rather prefer a more laid-back style of learning, sometimes referred to as edutainment. Obviously, given the large numbers of participants in these courses, there is not just one type of learners. Participants are not a homogeneous mass but a potpourri of individuals with a wildly heterogeneous mix of backgrounds, previous knowledge, familial and professional circumstances, countries of origin, gender, age, and so on. For the majority of participants, a full-time job and/or a family often just does not leave enough room for more time intensive tasks, such as practical exercises or teamwork. Others, however, particularly enjoy these hands-on or collaborative aspects of MOOCs. Furthermore, many subjects particularly require these possibilities and simply cannot be taught or learned in courses that lack collaborative or hands-on features. In this context, the thesis discusses how team assignments have been implemented on the HPI MOOC platform. During the recent years, several experiments have been conducted and a great amount of experience has been gained by employing team assignments in courses in areas, such as Object-Oriented Programming, Design Thinking, and Business Innovation on various instances of this platform: openHPI, openSAP, and mooc.house N2 - In einer Zeit stetigen Wandels und immer schneller wechselnder Technologien nimmt das lebenslange Lernen einen immer höheren Stellenwert ein. Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) sind ein hervorragendes Werkzeug, um in kurzer Zeit und mit vergleichsweise wenig Aufwand breite Teile der Bevölkerung zu erreichen. Das HPI leistet mit der eigenen Plattform openHPI und den für diverse Partner betriebenen Plattformen openSAP, OpenWHO und mooc.house sowohl im deutschsprachigen Raum als auch international einen wichtigen Beitrag zu digitalen Aufklärung. In vielen Bereichen ist die Plattform State of the Art und ist den international bekannteren Plattformen zumindest ebenbürtig. Gerade bei der Entwicklung und Anwendung von neuen Lehr- und Lernmethoden und deren technischer Unterstützung ist openHPI auch international richtungsweisend. Die vorliegende Dissertation befasst sich mit den Möglichkeiten der technischen und didaktischen Unterstützung von bewertbaren Aufgabenstellungen in MOOCs, die im Team zu bearbeiten sind. Durch die Größe der Kurse—in der Regel steht hier ein kleines Teaching Team mehreren tausend Teilnehmern gegenüber—ist eine manuelle Bewertung der Teilnehmenden durch die Lehrenden nicht möglich. Hier wird eine der alternativen Möglichkeiten zur Bewertung von Aufgaben, das sogenannte Peer Assessment, eingesetzt und für die speziellen Gegebenheiten der Bearbeitung von Aufgaben im Team angepasst. In den vergangenen fünf Jahren wurde eine iterative Langzeitstudie durchgeführt, bei der verschiedene qualitative und quantitative Methoden der Auswertung eingesetzt wurden. Das Ergebnis dieser Forschungsarbeit ist eine tiefgehende Einsicht in die Mechanismen der Teamarbeit in skalierenden digitalen Lernplattformen sowie eine Reihe von Empfehlungen zur weiteren Verbesserung der kollaborativen Eigenschaften der HPI-Plattformen, die zum Teil bereits umgesetzt wurden bzw. gerade umgesetzt werden. T2 - Benotete Teamaufgaben in skalierenden E-Learning-Systemen KW - massive open online courses KW - MOOC KW - collaborative learning KW - online learning KW - teamwork KW - peer assessment KW - digital learning KW - eLearning KW - collaborative work KW - kollaboratives Lernen KW - kollaboratives Arbeiten KW - digitales Lernen KW - MOOC KW - Massive Open Online Courses KW - Online-Lernen KW - Peer Assessment KW - Teamarbeit KW - eLearning Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-471830 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Vladova, Gergana A1 - Ullrich, André A1 - Bender, Benedict A1 - Gronau, Norbert T1 - Students’ acceptance of technology-mediated teaching – How it was influenced during the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020 BT - A study from Germany JF - Frontiers in psychology / Frontiers Research Foundation N2 - In response to the impending spread of COVID-19, universities worldwide abruptly stopped face-to-face teaching and switched to technology-mediated teaching. As a result, the use of technology in the learning processes of students of different disciplines became essential and the only way to teach, communicate and collaborate for months. In this crisis context, we conducted a longitudinal study in four German universities, in which we collected a total of 875 responses from students of information systems and music and arts at four points in time during the spring–summer 2020 semester. Our study focused on (1) the students’ acceptance of technology-mediated learning, (2) any change in this acceptance during the semester and (3) the differences in acceptance between the two disciplines. We applied the Technology Acceptance Model and were able to validate it for the extreme situation of the COVID-19 pandemic. We extended the model with three new variables (time flexibility, learning flexibility and social isolation) that influenced the construct of perceived usefulness. Furthermore, we detected differences between the disciplines and over time. In this paper, we present and discuss our study’s results and derive short- and long-term implications for science and practice. KW - COVID-19 KW - digital learning KW - discipline differences KW - e-learning KW - TAM KW - technology acceptance KW - technology-mediated teaching KW - university teaching Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.636086 SN - 1664-1078 VL - 12 PB - Frontiers Research Foundation CY - Lausanne ER - TY - GEN A1 - Vladova, Gergana A1 - Ullrich, André A1 - Bender, Benedict A1 - Gronau, Norbert T1 - Students’ Acceptance of Technology-Mediated Teaching – How It Was Influenced During the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020: A Study From Germany T2 - Postprints der Universität Potsdam Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe N2 - In response to the impending spread of COVID-19, universities worldwide abruptly stopped face-to-face teaching and switched to technology-mediated teaching. As a result, the use of technology in the learning processes of students of different disciplines became essential and the only way to teach, communicate and collaborate for months. In this crisis context, we conducted a longitudinal study in four German universities, in which we collected a total of 875 responses from students of information systems and music and arts at four points in time during the spring–summer 2020 semester. Our study focused on (1) the students’ acceptance of technology-mediated learning, (2) any change in this acceptance during the semester and (3) the differences in acceptance between the two disciplines. We applied the Technology Acceptance Model and were able to validate it for the extreme situation of the COVID-19 pandemic. We extended the model with three new variables (time flexibility, learning flexibility and social isolation) that influenced the construct of perceived usefulness. Furthermore, we detected differences between the disciplines and over time. In this paper, we present and discuss our study’s results and derive short- and long-term implications for science and practice. T3 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe - 141 KW - COVID-19 KW - digital learning KW - discipline differences KW - e-learning KW - TAM KW - technology acceptance KW - technology-mediated teaching KW - university teaching Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-521615 SN - 1867-5808 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Gonnermann, Jana A1 - Brandenburger, Bonny A1 - Vladova, Gergana A1 - Gronau, Norbert ED - Bui, Tung X. T1 - To what extent can individualisation in terms of different types of mode improve learning outcomes and learner satisfaction? BT - a pre-study T2 - Proceedings of the 56th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences January 3-6, 2023 N2 - With the latest technological developments and associated new possibilities in teaching, the personalisation of learning is gaining more and more importance. It assumes that individual learning experiences and results could generally be improved when personal learning preferences are considered. To do justice to the complexity of the personalisation possibilities of teaching and learning processes, we illustrate the components of learning and teaching in the digital environment and their interdependencies in an initial model. Furthermore, in a pre-study, we investigate the relationships between the learner's ability to (digital) self-organise, the learner’s prior- knowledge learning in different variants of mode and learning outcomes as one part of this model. With this pre-study, we are taking the first step towards a holistic model of teaching and learning in digital environments. KW - advances in teaching and learning technologies KW - digital learning KW - digital teaching KW - experimental design KW - personalised learning KW - teaching and learning model Y1 - 2023 SN - 978-0-9981331-6-4 SP - 123 EP - 132 PB - Department of IT Management Shidler College of Business University of Hawaii CY - Honolulu, HI ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Vladova, Gergana A1 - Ullrich, André A1 - Bender, Benedict A1 - Gronau, Norbert ED - Reis, Arsénio ED - Barroso, João ED - Lopes, J. Bernardino ED - Mikropoulos, Tassos ED - Fan, Chih-Wen T1 - Yes, we can (?) BT - a critical review of the COVID-19 semester T2 - Technology and innovation in learning, teaching and education : second international conference, TECH-EDU 2020, Vila Real, Portugal, December 2-4, 2020 : proceedings N2 - The COVID-19 crisis has caused an extreme situation for higher education institutions around the world, where exclusively virtual teaching and learning has become obligatory rather than an additional supporting feature. This has created opportunities to explore the potential and limitations of virtual learning formats. This paper presents four theses on virtual classroom teaching and learning that are discussed critically. We use existing theoretical insights extended by empirical evidence from a survey of more than 850 students on acceptance, expectations, and attitudes regarding the positive and negative aspects of virtual teaching. The survey responses were gathered from students at different universities during the first completely digital semester (Spring-Summer 2020) in Germany. We discuss similarities and differences between the subjects being studied and highlight the advantages and disadvantages of virtual teaching and learning. Against the background of existing theory and the gathered data, we emphasize the importance of social interaction, the combination of different learning formats, and thus context-sensitive hybrid learning as the learning form of the future. KW - COVID-19 KW - higher education KW - virtual learning KW - digital learning KW - subject differences Y1 - 2021 SN - 978-3-030-73987-4 SN - 978-3-030-73988-1 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73988-1_17 SP - 225 EP - 235 PB - Springer CY - Cham ER -