TY - JOUR A1 - Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar A1 - Küttner, Uwe-Alexander A1 - Raymond, Chase Wesley T1 - Pivots revisited BT - cesuring in action JF - Open linguistics N2 - The term "pivot" usually refers to two overlapping syntactic units such that the completion of the first unit simultaneously launches the second. In addition, pivots are generally said to be characterized by the smooth prosodic integration of their syntactic parts. This prosodic integration is typically achieved by prosodic-phonetic matching of the pivot components. As research on such turns in a range of languages has illustrated, speakers routinely deploy pivots so as to be able to continue past a point of possible turn completion, in the service of implementing some additional or revised action. This article seeks to build on, and complement, earlier research by exploring two issues in more detail as follows: (1) what exactly do pivotal turn extensions accomplish on the action dimension, and (2) what role does prosodic-phonetic packaging play in this? We will show that pivot constructions not only exhibit various degrees of prosodic-phonetic (non-)integration, i.e., differently strong cesuras, but that they can be ordered on a continuum, and that this cline maps onto the relationship of the actions accomplished by the components of the pivot construction. While tighter prosodic-phonetic integration, i.e., weak(er) cesuring, co-occurs with post-pivot actions whose relationship to that of the pre-pivot tends to be rather retrospective in character, looser prosodic-phonetic integration, i.e., strong(er) cesuring, is associated with a more prospective orientation of the post-pivot's action. These observations also raise more general questions with regard to the analysis of action. KW - Conversation Analysis KW - Interactional Linguistics KW - syntax KW - talk-in-interaction KW - prosody KW - phonetics KW - cesuras KW - intonation units KW - social action Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2020-0152 SN - 2300-9969 VL - 7 IS - 1 SP - 613 EP - 637 PB - de Gruyter CY - Warsaw ER - TY - BOOK A1 - Köser, Stephanie A1 - Küttner, Uwe-Alexander A1 - Kupetz, Maxi A1 - Trouvain, Jürgen A1 - Truong, Khiet P. A1 - Bose, Ines A1 - Kurtenbach, Stephanie A1 - Szczepek Reed, Beatrice A1 - Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth ED - Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar ED - Beatrice, Szczepek Reed T1 - Prosodie und Phonetik in der Interaktion T1 - Prosody and phonetics in interaction N2 - Phonetics and prosody have long been recognised as fundamental aspects of spoken discourse. Specifically, the prosody and phonetics of talk-in-interaction have become a field of study in its own right, with the majority of work to date focussing on the structuring of talk, turn-taking, and the contextualization of social practices, actions, genres, styles, affect etc. This volume presents an introduction to basic terms and concepts of prosodic-phonetic research as well as new contributions by young and established researchers in the field, for example, in the area of prosody and phonetics of affect display, public performance, institutional interaction, and sequence organisation. At the same time, it provides a survey of the methods currently employed and is thus aimed at students of language and interaction from a wide range of backgrounds as well as more experienced researchers and novices alike. N2 - Phonetik und Prosodie werden seit langem als fundamentale Aspekte des gesprochenen Diskurses behandelt. Insbesondere Prosodie und Phonetik natürlicher Alltagssprache haben sich zu einem eigenen Forschungsbereich entwickelt. Das Hauptaugenmerk lag dabei bisher auf Gesprächstruktur, Turn-Taking und die Kontextualisierung von sozialen Praktiken, Handlungen, Genres, Stilen und Affekten. Dieser Band präsentiert sowohl eine Einführung in Grundbegriffe und -konzepte der prosodisch-phonetischen Gesprächsforschung, als auch neue Befunde junger und etablierter ForscherInnen. Die einzelnen Kapitel behandeln unter anderem Prosodie und Phonetik von Affektdarstellungen, Theatervorstellungen, institutioneller Interaktion und Sequenzorganisation. Gleichzeitig bietet der Band einen Überblick über die Methoden, die in diesem Forschungsbereich genutzt werden. Der Band richtet sich damit an alle, für deren Arbeit die Erforschung von Sprache und Interaktion eine Rolle spielt, seien es Studierende oder erfahrene ForscherInnen. Y1 - 2014 UR - http://verlag-gespraechsforschung.de/2014/barth.html SN - 978-3-936656-60-2 PB - Verlag für Gesprächsforschung CY - Mannheim ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Küttner, Uwe-Alexander T1 - Tying sequences together with the [that’s + wh-clause] format BT - on (retro-)sequential junctures in conversation JF - Research on language and social interaction N2 - This article explores a sequence organizational phenomenon that results from the use of a loosely specifiable turn format (viz., That's + wh-clause) for launching (next) sequences while at the same time connecting back to a prior turn. Using this practice creates a sequential juncture, i.e., a pivot-like nexus between one sequence and a next. In third position, such junctures serve to accomplish seamless sequential transitions from one sequence into a next by presenting the latter as locally occasioned. The practice may, however, also be deployed in second position to launch actions that have not been made relevant or provided for by the preceding action and exhibit response relevance themselves. The sequential junctures then become retro-sequential in character: They transform the projected trajectory of the sequence in progress and create interlocking sequential structures. These findings highlight that sequence is practice, while pointing to understudied interconnections between tying and sequentiality. Data are in English. KW - answers KW - organization KW - questions KW - responses Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1739422 SN - 0835-1813 SN - 1532-7973 VL - 53 IS - 2 SP - 247 EP - 270 PB - Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group CY - New York ER - TY - THES A1 - Küttner, Uwe-Alexander T1 - That-initial turns in English conversation BT - an interactional linguistic investigation of two formats for designedly tying a current turn to a prior Y1 - 2016 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Küttner, Uwe-Alexander T1 - Rhythmic analyses as a proof-procedure? BT - An initial observation on rhythmicity and projection JF - Prosodie und Phonetik in der Interaktion = Prosody and phonetics in interaction N2 - This paper reports a problematic case of unequivocally evidencing participant orientation to the projective force of some turn-initial demonstrative wh-clefts (DCs) within the framework of Conversation Analysis (CA) and Interactional Linguistics (IL). Conducting rhythmic analyses appears helpful in this regard, in that they disclose rhythmic regularities which suggest a speaker's orientation towards a projected turn continuation. In this particular case, rhythmic analyses can therefore be shown to meaningfully complement sequential analyses and analyses of turn-design, so as to gather additional evidence for participant orientations. In conclusion, I will point to possibly more extensive relations between rhythmicity and projection and proffer a tentative outlook for the usability of rhythmic analyses as an analytic tool in CA and IL. N2 - Dieser primär interaktional-linguistisch ausgerichtete Beitrag berichtet von einem Problemfall im Nachweis von Teilnehmerorientierung an den Turn-Fortführung projizierenden Eigenschaften einiger turn-initialer "Demonstrative-Cleft- Konstruktionen" (DCs). Es wird gezeigt, dass rhythmische Analysen diesbezüglich hilfreich sein können, da sie im konkreten Fall rhythmische Regularitäten erkennen lassen, die eine sprecherseitige Orientierung an einer projizierten Turn-Fortführung nahelegen. Vorausgegangene sequenzielle Analysen und Analysen von Turn-Design werden somit bedeutsam durch rhythmische Analysen ergänzt, um zusätzliche Evidenzen für Teilnehmerorientierungen zu erfassen. Abschließend werde ich auf potenziell weitreichendere Zusammenhänge zwischen Rhythmizität und Projektion in der Interaktion hinweisen und einen provisorischen Ausblick hinsichtlich der möglichen Verwendung rhythmischer Analysen als Analysewerkzeug in der Konversationsanalyse und der Interaktionalen Linguistik geben. KW - Interaktionale Linguistik KW - Sprechrhythmus und Rhythmische Analyse KW - Methode KW - Teilnehmerorientierung KW - Turnkonstruktionseinheiten KW - Projektion KW - Demonstrative Clefts KW - Interactional Linguistics KW - Speech Rhythm and Rhythmic Analysis KW - Method KW - Participant Orientation KW - Turn-Constructional Units KW - Projection KW - Demonstrative Clefts Y1 - 2014 UR - http://verlag-gespraechsforschung.de/2014/pdf/kuettner-audio.pdf SN - 978-3-936656-60-2 SP - 46 EP - 69 PB - Verlag für Gesprächsforschung CY - Mannheim ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Küttner, Uwe-Alexander T1 - Opening Up CA – An Interactional Linguist’s View on ICCA-14 T2 - Gesprächsforschung : Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion Y1 - 2015 UR - http://www.gespraechsforschung-online.de/fileadmin/dateien/heft2014/tb-kuettner.pdf SN - 1617-1837 IS - 15 SP - 264 EP - 289 PB - Verlag für Gesprächsforschung CY - Mannheim ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Küttner, Uwe-Alexander T1 - Investigating Inferences in Sequences of Action BT - The Case of Claiming “Just-Now” Recollection with Oh That’s Right JF - Open Linguistics N2 - This paper offers an exploratory Interactional Linguistic account of the role that inferences play in episodes of ordinary conversational interaction. To this end, it systematically reconsiders the conversational practice of using the lexico-syntactic format oh that’s right to implicitly claim “just-now” recollection of something previously known, but momentarily confused or forgotten. The analyses reveal that this practice typically occurs as part of a larger sequential pattern that the participants orient to and which serves as a procedure for dealing with, and generating an account for, one participant’s production of an inapposite action. As will be shown, the instantiation and progressive realization of this sequential procedure requires local inferential work from the participants. While some facets of this inferential work appear to be shaped by the particular context of the ongoing interaction, others are integral to the workings of the sequence as such. Moreover, the analyses suggest that participants’ understanding of oh that’s right as embodying an implicit memory claim rests on an inference which is based on a kind of semanticpragmatic compositionality. The paper thus illustrates how inferences in conversational interaction can be systematically studied and points to the merits of combining an interactional and a linguistic perspective. KW - Interactional Linguistics KW - Conversation Analysis KW - inferences KW - action recognition KW - forgetfulness KW - confusion KW - recollection KW - oh that’s right Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2018-0006 SN - 2300-9969 VL - 4 IS - 1 SP - 101 EP - 126 PB - de Gruyter CY - Berlin ER - TY - GEN A1 - Küttner, Uwe-Alexander T1 - Investigating inferences in sequences of action BT - the case of claiming "Just-Now" recollection with oh that's right T2 - Postprints der Universität Potsdam: Philosophische Reihe N2 - This paper offers an exploratory Interactional Linguistic account of the role that inferences play in episodes of ordinary conversational interaction. To this end, it systematically reconsiders the conversational practice of using the lexico-syntactic format oh that's right to implicitly claim "just-now" recollection of something previously known, but momentarily confused or forgotten. The analyses reveal that this practice typically occurs as part of a larger sequential pattern that the participants orient to and which serves as a procedure for dealing with, and generating an account for, one participant's production of an inapposite action. As will be shown, the instantiation and progressive realization of this sequential procedure requires local inferential work from the participants. While some facets of this inferential work appear to be shaped by the particular context of the ongoing interaction, others are integral to the workings of the sequence as such. Moreover, the analyses suggest that participants' understanding of oh that's right as embodying an implicit memory claim rests on an inference which is based on a kind of semantic-pragmatic compositionality. The paper thus illustrates how inferences in conversational interaction can be systematically studied and points to the merits of combining an interactional and a linguistic perspective. T3 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe - 161 KW - interactional linguistics KW - conversation analysis KW - inferences KW - action recognition KW - forgetfulness KW - confusion KW - recollection KW - oh that's right Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-426310 IS - 161 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Küttner, Uwe-Alexander T1 - At the intersection of stance-management and repair BT - Meta-pragmatic claims as a practice for disarming disaffiliative responses JF - Gesprächsforschung : Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion N2 - Dieser Beitrag widmet sich der Verwendung eines spezifischen Typs meta-sprachlicher Äußerungen. Er untersucht wie SprecherInnen des Englischen meta-pragmatische Behauptungen, zuvor das „Gleiche" kommuniziert (‚gesagt' oder ‚gemeint') zu haben wie ihr Gesprächspartner, verwenden. Mit Hilfe detaillierter sequenzieller Analysen wird gezeigt, dass diese Behauptungen oft verwendet werden, um disaffiliative Erwiderungen zu entkräften und somit aufkeimende Meinungsverschiedenheiten aufzulösen. Neben der Beschreibung der Mechanismen, die dieser Praktik zu Grunde liegen, werden die verschiedenen verbalen, para- und non-verbalen Ressourcen, die bei der Verwendung dieser Praktik (teils variabel) zum Einsatz ge-bracht werden, inventarisiert. Abschließend wird das Verhältnis dieser Praktik zu anderen Gesprächspraktiken diskutiert. Da sie grundlegend darauf fußt, dass ein Missverständnis auf Seiten des Gegenübers insinuiert wird, kann sie an der Schnittstelle von Praktiken zum Management von Einstellungen bzw. Haltungen und Reparaturen verortet werden. N2 - This article offers an in-depth analysis of one particular type of meta-talk. It looks at how speakers use the meta-pragmatic claim to have previously communicated ('said' or 'meant') the same as, or the equivalent of, what their interlocutor just said. Through detailed sequential analyses, it is shown that this claim is frequently used as a practice for disarming disaffiliative responses and thus to manage (and often resolve) incipient disagreement. Besides unpacking the precise mechanisms underlying this practice, the paper also takes stock of the various (and partly variable) lexico-morpho-syntactic, prosodic and bodily-visual elements of conduct that recurrently enter into its composition. Since the practice essentially rests on the speaker’s insinuation of having been misunderstood by their co-participant, its relationship to the organization of repair will also be discussed. It is argued that the practice operates precisely at the intersection of stance-management (agreement/disagreement) and repair, and that it exhibits features which reflect this intersectional character. Data are in English. KW - meta-talk KW - (dis)affiliation KW - (dis)agreement KW - stance KW - repair KW - Conversation Analysis KW - Metasprache KW - Affiliation/Disaffiliation KW - Meta-Kommunikation KW - Reparaturen KW - Konversationsanalyse Y1 - 2019 UR - http://www.gespraechsforschung-online.de/fileadmin/dateien/heft2019/ga-kuettner.pdf SN - 1617-1837 IS - 20 SP - 115 EP - 156 PB - Verlag für Gesprächsforschung CY - Gleizendorf bei Nürnberg ER - TY - GEN A1 - Küttner, Uwe-Alexander T1 - At the intersection of stance-management and repair BT - Meta-pragmatic claims as a practice for disarming disaffiliative responses T2 - Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe N2 - This article offers an in-depth analysis of one particular type of meta-talk. It looks at how speakers use the meta-pragmatic claim to have previously communicated ('said' or 'meant') the same as, or the equivalent of, what their interlocutor just said. Through detailed sequential analyses, it is shown that this claim is frequently used as a practice for disarming disaffiliative responses and thus to manage (and often resolve) incipient disagreement. Besides unpacking the precise mechanisms underlying this practice, the paper also takes stock of the various (and partly variable) lexico-morpho-syntactic, prosodic and bodily-visual elements of conduct that recurrently enter into its composition. Since the practice essentially rests on the speaker’s insinuation of having been misunderstood by their co-participant, its relationship to the organization of repair will also be discussed. It is argued that the practice operates precisely at the intersection of stance-management (agreement/disagreement) and repair, and that it exhibits features which reflect this intersectional character. Data are in English. N2 - Dieser Beitrag widmet sich der Verwendung eines spezifischen Typs meta-sprachlicher Äußerungen. Er untersucht wie SprecherInnen des Englischen meta-pragmatische Behauptungen, zuvor das „Gleiche" kommuniziert (‚gesagt' oder ‚gemeint') zu haben wie ihr Gesprächspartner, verwenden. Mit Hilfe detaillierter sequenzieller Analysen wird gezeigt, dass diese Behauptungen oft verwendet werden, um disaffiliative Erwiderungen zu entkräften und somit aufkeimende Meinungsverschiedenheiten aufzulösen. Neben der Beschreibung der Mechanismen, die dieser Praktik zu Grunde liegen, werden die verschiedenen verbalen, para- und non-verbalen Ressourcen, die bei der Verwendung dieser Praktik (teils variabel) zum Einsatz ge-bracht werden, inventarisiert. Abschließend wird das Verhältnis dieser Praktik zu anderen Gesprächspraktiken diskutiert. Da sie grundlegend darauf fußt, dass ein Missverständnis auf Seiten des Gegenübers insinuiert wird, kann sie an der Schnittstelle von Praktiken zum Management von Einstellungen bzw. Haltungen und Reparaturen verortet werden. T3 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe - 168 KW - meta-talk KW - (dis)affiliation KW - (dis)agreement KW - stance KW - repair KW - Conversation Analysis KW - Metasprache KW - Affiliation/Disaffiliation KW - Meta-Kommunikation KW - Reparaturen KW - Konversationsanalyse Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-443485 SN - 1866-8380 SP - 115 EP - 156 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Küttner, Uwe-Alexander T1 - Rhythmic analyses as a proof-procedure? BT - An initial observation on rhythmicity and projection T2 - Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe N2 - This paper reports a problematic case of unequivocally evidencing participant orientation to the projective force of some turn-initial demonstrative wh-clefts (DCs) within the framework of Conversation Analysis (CA) and Interactional Linguistics (IL). Conducting rhythmic analyses appears helpful in this regard, in that they disclose rhythmic regularities which suggest a speaker's orientation towards a projected turn continuation. In this particular case, rhythmic analyses can therefore be shown to meaningfully complement sequential analyses and analyses of turn-design, so as to gather additional evidence for participant orientations. In conclusion, I will point to possibly more extensive relations between rhythmicity and projection and proffer a tentative outlook for the usability of rhythmic analyses as an analytic tool in CA and IL. T3 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe - 172 KW - Interactional Linguistics KW - Speech Rhythm and Rhythmic Analysis KW - Method KW - Participant Orientation KW - Turn-Constructional Units KW - Projection KW - Demonstrative Clefts Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-445363 SN - 1866-8380 IS - 172 ER -