TY - GEN A1 - Kühne, Franziska A1 - Lesser, Hannah A1 - Petri, Franziska A1 - Weck, Florian T1 - Do mental health patients learn what their cognitive-behaviour therapists think they do? BT - a short report on qualitative interviews comparing perspectives T2 - Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe N2 - Purpose: The acquisition of skills is essential to the conceptualization of cognitive-behavioural therapy. Yet, what experiences are encountered and what skills actually learned during therapy, and whether patients and therapists have concurrent views hereof, remains poorly understood. Method: An explorative pilot study with semi-structured, corresponding interview guides was conducted. Pilot data from our outpatient unit were transcribed and content-analyzed following current guidelines. Results: The responses of 18 participants (patients and their psychotherapists) were assigned to six main categories. Educational and cognitive aspects were mentioned most frequently and consistently by both groups. Having learned Behavioural alternatives attained the second highest agreement between perspectives. Conclusions: Patients and therapists valued CBT as an opportunity to learn new skills, which is an important prerequisite also for the maintenance of therapeutic change. We discuss limitations to generalizability but also theoretical and therapy implications. T3 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe - 490 KW - cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) KW - psychotherapy KW - interview study KW - learning KW - skills Y1 - 2018 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-420607 SN - 1866-8364 IS - 490 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kühne, Franziska A1 - Lesser, Hannah A1 - Petri, Franziska A1 - Weck, Florian T1 - Do mental health patients learn what their cognitive-behaviour therapists think they do? BT - A short report on qualitative interviews comparing perspectives JF - International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being N2 - Purpose: The acquisition of skills is essential to the conceptualization of cognitive-behavioural therapy. Yet, what experiences are encountered and what skills actually learned during therapy, and whether patients and therapists have concurrent views hereof, remains poorly understood. Method: An explorative pilot study with semi-structured, corresponding interview guides was conducted. Pilot data from our outpatient unit were transcribed and content-analyzed following current guidelines. Results: The responses of 18 participants (patients and their psychotherapists) were assigned to six main categories. Educational and cognitive aspects were mentioned most frequently and consistently by both groups. Having learned Behavioural alternatives attained the second highest agreement between perspectives. Conclusions: Patients and therapists valued CBT as an opportunity to learn new skills, which is an important prerequisite also for the maintenance of therapeutic change. We discuss limitations to generalizability but also theoretical and therapy implications. KW - cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) KW - psychotherapy KW - interview study KW - learning KW - skills Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2018.1527598 SN - 1748-2631 SN - 1748-2623 VL - 13 IS - 1 PB - Taylor & Francis Group CY - London ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Gropalis, Maria A1 - Bailer, Josef A1 - Weck, Florian A1 - Witthöft, Michael T1 - Optimierung von Expositionstherapie bei pathologischen Krankheitsängsten T1 - Optimization of exposure therapy for pathological health anxiety BT - Theoretische Grundlagen und praktische Implikationen BT - Theoretical principles and practical implications JF - Psychotherapeut N2 - Pathologische Krankheitsängste wurden bislang nach ICD und DSM primär als somatoforme Störung bzw. als somatische Belastungsstörung klassifiziert. Theoretische Erwägungen und empirische Befunde legen jedoch nahe, dass es sich bei pathologischen Krankheitsängsten eigentlich um eine Angststörung handelt. Innerhalb des vorliegenden Beitrags wird dafür argumentiert, dass Defizite in der aktuellen Behandlungspraxis und in der Wahrnehmung von Patienten mit Hypochondrie als „schwierige Patienten“ teilweise auf Unklarheit in der Nosologie sowie bezüglich der entscheidenden Mechanismen der Entstehung und Aufrechterhaltung zurückzuführen sind. Ausgehend von innovativen theoretischen Ansätzen zur Erklärung pathologischer Krankheitsängste werden Vorschläge für eine verbesserte therapeutische Praxis skizziert. Der Fokus liegt hierbei auf einem verstärken Einsatz expositionsbasierter Behandlungselemente, die sich am „Inhibitory-learning“-Ansatz orientieren und sich bei anderen Angststörungen bereits bewährt haben. N2 - Up to now pathological health anxiety has been classified primarily as a somatoform disorder or a somatic symptom disorder in ICD and DSM. Theoretical and empirical evidence, however, suggest that pathological health anxiety basically represents an anxiety disorder. In this paper, it is argued that deficits in the treatment and perception of patients with pathological health anxiety as "difficult patients" are partly attributable to a lack of clarity in terms of nosology and with respect to central mechanisms of etiology and pathogenesis. Based on novel theoretical approaches for the explanation of pathological health anxiety, suggestions for an improved therapeutic practice are outlined. This approach focuses on a more intensive use of exposure-based treatment elements that are oriented to the inhibitory learning approach, which has already proven its effectiveness for other anxiety disorders. KW - Hypochondriasis KW - Anxiety disorders KW - Inhibition KW - Learning KW - Cognitive behavior therapy KW - Hypochondrie KW - Angststörungen KW - Inhibition KW - Lernen KW - Kognitive Verhaltenstherapie Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00278-018-0285-1 SN - 0935-6185 SN - 1432-2080 VL - 63 IS - 3 SP - 188 EP - 193 PB - Springer CY - New York ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Probst, Thomas A1 - Jakob, Marion A1 - Kaufmann, Yvonne Marie A1 - Müller-Neng, Julia M. B. A1 - Bohus, Martin A1 - Weck, Florian T1 - Patients’ and therapists’ experiences of general change mechanisms during bug-in-the-eye and delayed video-based supervised cognitive-behavioral therapy BT - a randomized controlled trial JF - Journal of clinical psychology N2 - ObjectiveThis secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial investigated whether bug-in-the-eye (BITE) supervision (live computer-based supervision during a psychotherapy session) affects the manner in which patients and therapists experience general change mechanisms (GCMs) during cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). MethodA total of 23 therapists were randomized either to the BITE condition or the control condition (delayed video-based [DVB] supervision). After each session, both patients (BITE: n=19; DVB: n=23) and therapists (BITE: n=11; DVB: n=12) completed the Helping Alliance Questionnaire (HAQ) and the Bernese Post Session Report (BPSR). The HAQ total score and the 3 secondary factors of the BPSR (interpersonal experiences, intrapersonal experiences, problem actuation) functioned as GCMs. Multilevel models were performed. ResultsFor patients, GCMs did not develop differently between BITE and DVB during CBT. Therapists rated the alliance as well as interpersonal and intrapersonal experiences not significantly different between BITE and DVB during CBT, but they perceived problem actuation to increase significantly more in BITE than in DVB (p<.05). ConclusionBITE supervision might be helpful in encouraging CBT therapists to apply interventions, which focus on the activation of relevant problems and related emotions. KW - alliance KW - general change mechanisms KW - live supervision KW - randomized controlled trial Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22519 SN - 0021-9762 SN - 1097-4679 VL - 74 IS - 4 SP - 509 EP - 522 PB - Wiley CY - Hoboken ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kühne, Franziska A1 - Ay, Destina Sevde A1 - Otterbeck, Mara Jasmin A1 - Weck, Florian T1 - Standardized Patients in Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy BT - a Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators for Implementation JF - Academic psychiatry N2 - ObjectivesThe use of simulated and standardized patients (SP) is widely accepted in the medical field and, from there, is beginning to disseminate into clinical psychology and psychotherapy. The purpose of this study was therefore to systematically review barriers and facilitators that should be considered in the implementation of SP interventions specific to clinical psychology and psychotherapy.MethodsFollowing current guidelines, a scoping review was conducted. The literature search focused on the MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Web of Science databases, including Dissertation Abstracts International. After screening for titles and abstracts, full texts were screened independently and in duplicate according to our inclusion criteria. For data extraction, a pre-defined form was piloted and used. Units of meaning with respect to barriers and facilitators were extracted and categorized inductively using content-analysis techniques. From the results, a matrix of interconnections and a network graph were compiled.ResultsThe 41 included publications were mainly in the fields of psychiatry and mental health nursing, as well as in training and education. The detailed category system contrasts four supercategories, i.e., which organizational and economic aspects to consider, which persons to include as eligible SPs, how to develop adequate scenarios, and how to authentically and consistently portray mental health patients.ConclusionsPublications focused especially on the interrelation between authenticity and consistency of portrayals, on how to evoke empathy in learners, and on economic and training aspects. A variety of recommendations for implementing SP programs, from planning to training, monitoring, and debriefing, is provided, for example, ethical screening of and ongoing support for SPs. KW - Standardized patients KW - Simulated patients KW - Systematic review KW - Psychotherapy research Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-018-0886-6 SN - 1042-9670 SN - 1545-7230 VL - 42 IS - 6 SP - 773 EP - 781 PB - Springer CY - New York ER - TY - GEN A1 - Kühne, Franziska A1 - Ay, Destina Sevde Ay A1 - Otterbeck, Mara Jasmin A1 - Weck, Florian T1 - Standardized Patients in Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy BT - a Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators for Implementation T2 - Postprints der Universität Potsdam: Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe N2 - Objectives: The use of simulated and standardized patients (SP) is widely accepted in the medical field and, from there, is beginning to disseminate into clinical psychology and psychotherapy. The purpose of this study was therefore to systematically review barriers and facilitators that should be considered in the implementation of SP interventions specific to clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Methods: Following current guidelines, a scoping review was conducted. The literature search focused on the MEDLINE,PsycINFO and Web of Science databases, including Dissertation Abstracts International. After screening for titles and abstracts,full texts were screened independently and in duplicate according to our inclusion criteria. For data extraction, a pre-defined form was piloted and used. Units of meaning with respect to barriers and facilitators were extracted and categorized inductively using content-analysis techniques. From the results, a matrix of interconnections and a network graph were compiled. Results: The 41 included publications were mainly in the fields of psychiatry and mental health nursing, as well as in training and education. The detailed category system contrasts four supercategories, i.e., which organizational and economic aspects to consider, which persons to include as eligible SPs, how to develop adequate scenarios, and how to authentically and consistently portray mental health patients.Conclusions: Publications focused especially on the interrelation between authenticity and consistency of portrayals, on how to evoke empathy in learners, and on economic and training aspects. A variety of recommendations for implementing SP programs,from planning to training, monitoring, and debriefing, is provided, for example, ethical screening of and ongoing support for SPs. T3 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe - 541 KW - Standardized patients KW - Simulated patients KW - Systematic review KW - Psychotherapy research Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-426965 IS - 541 ER -