TY - JOUR A1 - Cope, Justin L. A1 - Baukmann, Hannes A. A1 - Klinger, Jörn E. A1 - Ravarani, Charles N. J. A1 - Böttinger, Erwin A1 - Konigorski, Stefan A1 - Schmidt, Marco F. T1 - Interaction-based feature selection algorithm outperforms polygenic risk score in predicting Parkinson’s Disease status JF - Frontiers in genetics N2 - Polygenic risk scores (PRS) aggregating results from genome-wide association studies are the state of the art in the prediction of susceptibility to complex traits or diseases, yet their predictive performance is limited for various reasons, not least of which is their failure to incorporate the effects of gene-gene interactions. Novel machine learning algorithms that use large amounts of data promise to find gene-gene interactions in order to build models with better predictive performance than PRS. Here, we present a data preprocessing step by using data-mining of contextual information to reduce the number of features, enabling machine learning algorithms to identify gene-gene interactions. We applied our approach to the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) dataset, an observational clinical study of 471 genotyped subjects (368 cases and 152 controls). With an AUC of 0.85 (95% CI = [0.72; 0.96]), the interaction-based prediction model outperforms the PRS (AUC of 0.58 (95% CI = [0.42; 0.81])). Furthermore, feature importance analysis of the model provided insights into the mechanism of Parkinson's disease. For instance, the model revealed an interaction of previously described drug target candidate genes TMEM175 and GAPDHP25. These results demonstrate that interaction-based machine learning models can improve genetic prediction models and might provide an answer to the missing heritability problem. KW - epistasis KW - machine learning KW - feature selection KW - parkinson's disease KW - PPMI (parkinson's progression markers initiative) Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.744557 SN - 1664-8021 VL - 12 PB - Frontiers Media CY - Lausanne ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Vaid, Akhil A1 - Chan, Lili A1 - Chaudhary, Kumardeep A1 - Jaladanki, Suraj K. A1 - Paranjpe, Ishan A1 - Russak, Adam J. A1 - Kia, Arash A1 - Timsina, Prem A1 - Levin, Matthew A. A1 - He, John Cijiang A1 - Böttinger, Erwin A1 - Charney, Alexander W. A1 - Fayad, Zahi A. A1 - Coca, Steven G. A1 - Glicksberg, Benjamin S. A1 - Nadkarni, Girish N. T1 - Predictive approaches for acute dialysis requirement and death in COVID-19 JF - Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN N2 - Background and objectives AKI treated with dialysis initiation is a common complication of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) among hospitalized patients. However, dialysis supplies and personnel are often limited. Design, setting, participants, & measurements Using data from adult patients hospitalized with COVID-19 from five hospitals from theMount Sinai Health System who were admitted between March 10 and December 26, 2020, we developed and validated several models (logistic regression, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), random forest, and eXtreme GradientBoosting [XGBoost; with and without imputation]) for predicting treatment with dialysis or death at various time horizons (1, 3, 5, and 7 days) after hospital admission. Patients admitted to theMount Sinai Hospital were used for internal validation, whereas the other hospitals formed part of the external validation cohort. Features included demographics, comorbidities, and laboratory and vital signs within 12 hours of hospital admission. Results A total of 6093 patients (2442 in training and 3651 in external validation) were included in the final cohort. Of the different modeling approaches used, XGBoost without imputation had the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve on internal validation (range of 0.93-0.98) and area under the precisionrecall curve (AUPRC; range of 0.78-0.82) for all time points. XGBoost without imputation also had the highest test parameters on external validation (AUROC range of 0.85-0.87, and AUPRC range of 0.27-0.54) across all time windows. XGBoost without imputation outperformed all models with higher precision and recall (mean difference in AUROC of 0.04; mean difference in AUPRC of 0.15). Features of creatinine, BUN, and red cell distribution width were major drivers of the model's prediction. Conclusions An XGBoost model without imputation for prediction of a composite outcome of either death or dialysis in patients positive for COVID-19 had the best performance, as compared with standard and other machine learning models. KW - COVID-19 KW - dialysis KW - machine learning KW - prediction KW - AKI Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.17311120 SN - 1555-9041 SN - 1555-905X VL - 16 IS - 8 SP - 1158 EP - 1168 PB - American Society of Nephrology CY - Washington ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Vaid, Akhil A1 - Somani, Sulaiman A1 - Russak, Adam J. A1 - De Freitas, Jessica K. A1 - Chaudhry, Fayzan F. A1 - Paranjpe, Ishan A1 - Johnson, Kipp W. A1 - Lee, Samuel J. A1 - Miotto, Riccardo A1 - Richter, Felix A1 - Zhao, Shan A1 - Beckmann, Noam D. A1 - Naik, Nidhi A1 - Kia, Arash A1 - Timsina, Prem A1 - Lala, Anuradha A1 - Paranjpe, Manish A1 - Golden, Eddye A1 - Danieletto, Matteo A1 - Singh, Manbir A1 - Meyer, Dara A1 - O'Reilly, Paul F. A1 - Huckins, Laura A1 - Kovatch, Patricia A1 - Finkelstein, Joseph A1 - Freeman, Robert M. A1 - Argulian, Edgar A1 - Kasarskis, Andrew A1 - Percha, Bethany A1 - Aberg, Judith A. A1 - Bagiella, Emilia A1 - Horowitz, Carol R. A1 - Murphy, Barbara A1 - Nestler, Eric J. A1 - Schadt, Eric E. A1 - Cho, Judy H. A1 - Cordon-Cardo, Carlos A1 - Fuster, Valentin A1 - Charney, Dennis S. A1 - Reich, David L. A1 - Böttinger, Erwin A1 - Levin, Matthew A. A1 - Narula, Jagat A1 - Fayad, Zahi A. A1 - Just, Allan C. A1 - Charney, Alexander W. A1 - Nadkarni, Girish N. A1 - Glicksberg, Benjamin S. T1 - Machine learning to predict mortality and critical events in a cohort of patients with COVID-19 in New York City: model development and validation JF - Journal of medical internet research : international scientific journal for medical research, information and communication on the internet ; JMIR N2 - Background: COVID-19 has infected millions of people worldwide and is responsible for several hundred thousand fatalities. The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated thoughtful resource allocation and early identification of high-risk patients. However, effective methods to meet these needs are lacking. Objective: The aims of this study were to analyze the electronic health records (EHRs) of patients who tested positive for COVID-19 and were admitted to hospitals in the Mount Sinai Health System in New York City; to develop machine learning models for making predictions about the hospital course of the patients over clinically meaningful time horizons based on patient characteristics at admission; and to assess the performance of these models at multiple hospitals and time points. Methods: We used Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and baseline comparator models to predict in-hospital mortality and critical events at time windows of 3, 5, 7, and 10 days from admission. Our study population included harmonized EHR data from five hospitals in New York City for 4098 COVID-19-positive patients admitted from March 15 to May 22, 2020. The models were first trained on patients from a single hospital (n=1514) before or on May 1, externally validated on patients from four other hospitals (n=2201) before or on May 1, and prospectively validated on all patients after May 1 (n=383). Finally, we established model interpretability to identify and rank variables that drive model predictions. Results: Upon cross-validation, the XGBoost classifier outperformed baseline models, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) for mortality of 0.89 at 3 days, 0.85 at 5 and 7 days, and 0.84 at 10 days. XGBoost also performed well for critical event prediction, with an AUC-ROC of 0.80 at 3 days, 0.79 at 5 days, 0.80 at 7 days, and 0.81 at 10 days. In external validation, XGBoost achieved an AUC-ROC of 0.88 at 3 days, 0.86 at 5 days, 0.86 at 7 days, and 0.84 at 10 days for mortality prediction. Similarly, the unimputed XGBoost model achieved an AUC-ROC of 0.78 at 3 days, 0.79 at 5 days, 0.80 at 7 days, and 0.81 at 10 days. Trends in performance on prospective validation sets were similar. At 7 days, acute kidney injury on admission, elevated LDH, tachypnea, and hyperglycemia were the strongest drivers of critical event prediction, while higher age, anion gap, and C-reactive protein were the strongest drivers of mortality prediction. Conclusions: We externally and prospectively trained and validated machine learning models for mortality and critical events for patients with COVID-19 at different time horizons. These models identified at-risk patients and uncovered underlying relationships that predicted outcomes. KW - machine learning KW - COVID-19 KW - electronic health record KW - TRIPOD KW - clinical KW - informatics KW - prediction KW - mortality KW - EHR KW - cohort KW - hospital KW - performance Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.2196/24018 SN - 1439-4456 SN - 1438-8871 VL - 22 IS - 11 PB - Healthcare World CY - Richmond, Va. ER -