TY - JOUR A1 - Meythaler, Antonia A1 - Krause, Hannes-Vincent A1 - Baumann, Annika A1 - Krasnova, Hanna A1 - Thatcher, Jason Bennett T1 - The rise of metric-based digital status BT - an empirical investigation into the role of status perceptions in envy on social networking sites JF - European Journal of Information Systems N2 - Widespread on social networking sites (SNSs), envy has been linked to an array of detrimental outcomes for users’ well-being. While envy has been considered a status-related emotion and is likely to be experienced in response to perceiving another’s higher status, there is a lack of research exploring how status perceptions influence the emergence of envy on SNSs. This is important because SNSs typically quantify social interactions and reach with metrics that indicate users’ relative rank and status in the network. To understand how status perceptions impact SNS users, we introduce a new form of metric-based digital status rooted in SNS metrics that are available and visible on a platform. Drawing on social comparison theory and status literature, we conducted an online experiment to investigate how different forms of status contribute to the proliferation of envy on SNSs. Our findings shed light on how metric-based digital status influences feelings of envy on SNSs. Specifically, we could show that metric-based digital status impacts envy through increasing perceptions of others’ socioeconomic and sociometric statuses. Our study contributes to the growing discourse on the negative outcomes associated with SNS use and its consequences for users and society. KW - social networking sites KW - metric-based digital status KW - social comparisons KW - social status KW - envy KW - experiment Y1 - 2023 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2023.2290707 SN - 0960-085X SN - 1476-9344 SP - 1 EP - 28 PB - Taylor and Francis CY - London ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Grum, Marcus A1 - Gronau, Norbert ED - Shishkov, Boris T1 - Quantification of knowledge transfers BT - the design of an experiment setting for the examination of knowledge transfers T2 - Business modeling and software design : 11th International Symposium, BMSD 2021, Sofia, Bulgaria, July 5–7, 2021, Proceedings N2 - Faced with the triad of time-cost-quality, the realization of knowledge-intensive tasks at economic conditions is not trivial. Since the number of knowledge-intensive processes is increasing more and more nowadays, the efficient design of knowledge transfers at business processes as well as the target-oriented improvement of them is essential, so that process outcomes satisfy high quality criteria and economic requirements. This particularly challenges knowledge management, aiming for the assignment of ideal manifestations of influence factors on knowledge transfers to a certain task. Faced with first attempts of knowledge transfer-based process improvements [1], this paper continues research about the quantitative examination of knowledge transfers and presents a ready-to-go experiment design that is able to examine quality of knowledge transfers empirically and is suitable to examine knowledge transfers on a quantitative level. Its use is proven by the example of four influence factors, which namely are stickiness, complexity, competence and time pressure. KW - knowledge management KW - knowledge transfer KW - conversion KW - empirical examination KW - experiment Y1 - 2021 SN - 978-3-030-79975-5 SN - 978-3-030-79976-2 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79976-2_13 VL - 422 SP - 224 EP - 242 PB - Springer International Publishing CY - Cham ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Fischer, Caroline T1 - Incentives can’t buy me knowledge BT - the missing effects of appreciation and aligned performance appraisals on knowledge sharing of public employees JF - Review of public personnel administration N2 - This study examines whether incentives affect public employees' intention to share knowledge. Tested incentives satisfy needs for either achievement or appreciation. Both treatments were tested on implicit as well as explicit knowledge sharing. A 2 x 3 factorial survey experiment was designed to observe within-person and between-person effects. Data were collected from public employees in the core administration and healthcare sector (n = 623) in 2018. The analysis indicates that both treatments positively affect knowledge-sharing intention if it is explicit knowledge that ought to be shared. However, no effects of either treatment can be found in either type of knowledge sharing. No negative effect of the tested incentives on knowledge sharing was observed. Hence, incentives might not harm knowledge sharing but also do not pay off in organizational practice. In contrast to these motivation-enhancing human resource practices, ability and opportunity-enhancing practices should be tested to foster knowledge sharing. KW - knowledge sharing KW - knowledge management KW - work behavior KW - rewards KW - survey KW - experiment Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X20986839 SN - 0734-371X SN - 1552-759X VL - 42 IS - 2 SP - 368 EP - 389 PB - Sage CY - London ER -