TY - THES A1 - Getmancev, Ivan T1 - „Frauenquote“ - Handlungskoordination zwischen Staat, Wirtschaft und Zivilgesellschaft T1 - "Women's quota" - coordination of action between government, economy and civil society BT - eine Governance-Analyse BT - a governance analysis N2 - Gleichstellungspolitik als „Querschnittspolitik“ ist eine der oft genannten politische Metapher unserer Zeit. Ob in der Arbeitsmarkt-, Steuer-, Familien- oder Bildungspolitik, Gleichstellung ist in allen diesen Bereichen von hoher Relevanz. Der „Querschnittscharakter“ der Gleichstellungspolitik trägt dazu bei, dass in diesem Politikbereich viele unterschiedliche Akteure mit ebenso unterschiedlichen Handlungslogiken sowie Zielen aufeinandertreffen. Um Gleichstellungprogramme planen und darüber Gleichstellungspolitiken gestalten zu können, müssen die Handlungen dieser Akteure koordiniert werden. In dieser Arbeit wird unter Verwendung des Governance-Ansatzes der Frage nachgegangen, wie die Handlungskoordination zwischen unterschiedlichen Akteuren im System der deutschen Gleichstellungspolitik erfolgt. Analysiert und rekonstruiert werden die gleichstellungspolitischen Entwicklungen in der BRD seit den 1990er Jahren, anhand der Auswertung relevanter Regierungsdokumente und wissenschaftlicher Sekundärliteratur. Hierarchien, Netzwerke und Verhandlungen – Ausprägungen der Governance-Formen – stehen bei der Rekonstruktion und Analyse der Akteurskonstellationen im Mittelpunkt. Im Ergebnis konnten im Falle Deutschlands zwei verschiedene „Gleichstellungsgovernance-Regime“ identifiziert werden. Diese sind gekennzeichnet durch die in den Regimen je dominierenden Handlugskoordinationsmechanismen der „wirtschaftlichen-Selbstkoordination“ (2001) und der „wechselseitigen-Beobachtung“ (2003-2012). Der Vergleich dieser beiden Regime zeigt, dass sie sich vor allem in Hinblick auf ihre Akteurskonstellationen unterscheiden. In ihnen herrschen je eigene Handlungslogiken und als Folge daraus unterschiedliche gleichstellungspolitische Ergebnisse. N2 - Equality policy as cross-cutting policy is one of the often-mentioned political metaphors of our time. For whether concerning labor, tax, family or education policies, equality is in all these areas of high relevance. The cross-cutting nature of gender equality policy leads to an encounter of many different actors with different logics of action and different goals in this policy area. In order to plan such equality programs and to structure gender equality policies based on them, the actions of the actors must be coordinated. The main research point of this study is how the coordination of action between different actors in the system of the german gender policy takes place. The governance concept is used here for this purpose as an analytical tool. In the analytical part, the gender equality policy developments in the Federal Republic of Germany of the 1990s are being reconstructed and analyzed. The analysis is based on the evaluation of the relevant government documents and scientific secondary literature. Hierarchies, networks and negotiations, the characteristics of the governance arrangements available for the reconstruction and analysis of actor constellations are the focus of this work. As a result, in the case of Germany two different „equality governance regimes“ are identified. The regimes are characterized by two dominant action-coordination-mechanisms, which are on the one hand the “economic self-coordination” (2001) and on the other hand the “mutual observation” (2003-2012). The comparison of these two regimes shows that they differ mainly in terms of their constellations of actors. In both of them there are own logics of action respectively and, as a consequence, different gender equality results which prevail. KW - Governance-Analyse KW - Gleichstellungspolitik KW - Akteurskonstellationen KW - Handlungslogiken KW - Governance-Formen KW - governance analysis KW - governance forms KW - gender equality KW - constellations of actors KW - logics of actions KW - equality policy Y1 - 2014 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-73373 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Hipp, Lena A1 - Schlüter, Charlotte A1 - Molina, Stefania ED - Dobrotić, Ivana ED - Blum, Sonja ED - Koslowski, Alison T1 - The role of employers in reducing the implementation gap in leave policies T2 - Research handbook on leave policy N2 - Although mothers and fathers in almost all rich democracies are entitled to some form of paid parenting leave, fathers in particular do not take all the leave available to them. As employers play an important role in the implementation of parenting leave policies, this chapter investigates which workplace characteristics influence mothers' and fathers' uptake of their statutory leave entitlements. In Part 1, we estimate the size of the gap between statutory leave entitlement and leave uptake across genders and countries by combining data from the OECD and the European Labor Force Survey. In Parts 2 and 3, we review the literature on structural, cultural, and normative explanations for the gap in parenting leave uptake. We conclude the chapter with suggestions for further research, including the need for reliable data on the size of the implementation gap and research on non-European countries. KW - parental leave KW - policy implementation KW - employment KW - workplace culture KW - gender equality Y1 - 2022 SN - 978-1-80037-221-4 SN - 978-1-80037-220-7 U6 - https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800372214.00036 SP - 338 EP - 352 PB - Edward Elgar Publishing CY - Cheltenham, UK ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Bünning, Mareike A1 - Hipp, Lena T1 - How can we become more equal? BT - public policies and parents’ work–family preferences in Germany JF - Journal of European social policy N2 - This study examines how public policies affect parents' preferences for a more egalitarian division of paid and unpaid work. Based on the assumption that individuals develop their preferences within a specific policy context, we examine how changes in three policies affect mothers' and fathers' work-family preferences: the availability of high-quality, affordable childcare; the right to return to a full-time job after having reduced hours to part-time and an increase in the number of 'partner months' in parental leave schemes. Analysing a unique probability sample of parents with young children in Germany from 2015 (N = 1756), we find that fathers would want to work slightly fewer hours if they had the right to return to a full-time position after working part-time, and mothers would want to work slightly more hours if childcare opportunities were improved. Full-time working parents, moreover, are found to prefer fewer hours independent of the policy setting, while non-employed parents would like to work at least some hours. Last but not least, our analyses show that increasing the number of partner months in the parental leave scheme considerably increases fathers' preferences for longer and mothers' preferences for shorter leave. Increasing the number of partner months in parental schemes hence has the greatest potential to increase gender equality. KW - work-family policies KW - parental leave KW - childcare KW - working time KW - regulations KW - parenthood KW - working hours KW - gender equality KW - preferences KW - capabilities framework Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1177/09589287211035701 SN - 0958-9287 SN - 1461-7269 VL - 32 IS - 2 SP - 182 EP - 196 PB - Sage Publ. CY - London ER -