TY - CHAP A1 - Vladova, Gergana A1 - Ullrich, André A1 - Sultanow, Eldar A1 - Tobolla, Marinho A1 - Sebrak, Sebastian A1 - Czarnecki, Christian A1 - Brockmann, Carsten ED - Klein, Maike ED - Krupka, Daniel ED - Winter, Cornelia ED - Wohlgemuth, Volker T1 - Visual analytics for knowledge management BT - advantages for organizations and interorganizational teams T2 - Informatik 2023 N2 - The management of knowledge in organizations considers both established long-term processes and cooperation in agile project teams. Since knowledge can be both tacit and explicit, its transfer from the individual to the organizational knowledge base poses a challenge in organizations. This challenge increases when the fluctuation of knowledge carriers is exceptionally high. Especially in large projects in which external consultants are involved, there is a risk that critical, company-relevant knowledge generated in the project will leave the company with the external knowledge carrier and thus be lost. In this paper, we show the advantages of an early warning system for knowledge management to avoid this loss. In particular, the potential of visual analytics in the context of knowledge management systems is presented and discussed. We present a project for the development of a business-critical software system and discuss the first implementations and results. KW - knowledge management KW - visual analytics KW - knowledge transfer KW - teamwork KW - knowledge management system KW - tacit knowledge KW - explicit knowledge Y1 - 2023 SN - 978-3-88579-731-9 U6 - https://doi.org/10.18420/inf2023_187 SN - 1617-5468 SP - 1851 EP - 1870 PB - Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI) CY - Bonn ER - TY - THES A1 - Staubitz, Thomas T1 - Gradable team assignments in large scale learning environments BT - collaborative learning, teamwork, and peer assessment in MOOCs BT - Kollaboratives Lernen, Teamarbeit und Peer Assessment in MOOCs N2 - Lifelong learning plays an increasingly important role in many societies. Technology is changing faster than ever and what has been important to learn today, may be obsolete tomorrow. The role of informal programs is becoming increasingly important. Particularly, Massive Open Online Courses have become popular among learners and instructors. In 2008, a group of Canadian education enthusiasts started the first Massive Open Online Courses or MOOCs to prove their cognitive theory of Connectivism. Around 2012, a variety of American start-ups redefined the concept of MOOCs. Instead of following the connectivist doctrine they returned to a more traditional approach. They focussed on video lecturing and combined this with a course forum that allowed the participants to discuss with each other and the teaching team. While this new version of the concept was enormously successful in terms of massiveness—hundreds of thousands of participants from all over the world joined the first of these courses—many educators criticized the re-lapse to the cognitivist model. In the early days, the evolving platforms often did not have more features than a video player, simple multiple-choice quizzes, and the course forum. It soon became a major interest of research to allow the scaling of more modern approaches of learning and teaching for the massiveness of these courses. Hands-on exercises, alternative forms of assessment, collaboration, and teamwork are some of the topics on the agenda. The insights provided by cognitive and pedagogical theories, however, do not necessarily always run in sync with the needs and the preferences of the majority of participants. While the former promote action-learning, hands-on-learning, competence-based-learning, project-based-learning, team-based-learning as the holy grail, many of the latter often rather prefer a more laid-back style of learning, sometimes referred to as edutainment. Obviously, given the large numbers of participants in these courses, there is not just one type of learners. Participants are not a homogeneous mass but a potpourri of individuals with a wildly heterogeneous mix of backgrounds, previous knowledge, familial and professional circumstances, countries of origin, gender, age, and so on. For the majority of participants, a full-time job and/or a family often just does not leave enough room for more time intensive tasks, such as practical exercises or teamwork. Others, however, particularly enjoy these hands-on or collaborative aspects of MOOCs. Furthermore, many subjects particularly require these possibilities and simply cannot be taught or learned in courses that lack collaborative or hands-on features. In this context, the thesis discusses how team assignments have been implemented on the HPI MOOC platform. During the recent years, several experiments have been conducted and a great amount of experience has been gained by employing team assignments in courses in areas, such as Object-Oriented Programming, Design Thinking, and Business Innovation on various instances of this platform: openHPI, openSAP, and mooc.house N2 - In einer Zeit stetigen Wandels und immer schneller wechselnder Technologien nimmt das lebenslange Lernen einen immer höheren Stellenwert ein. Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) sind ein hervorragendes Werkzeug, um in kurzer Zeit und mit vergleichsweise wenig Aufwand breite Teile der Bevölkerung zu erreichen. Das HPI leistet mit der eigenen Plattform openHPI und den für diverse Partner betriebenen Plattformen openSAP, OpenWHO und mooc.house sowohl im deutschsprachigen Raum als auch international einen wichtigen Beitrag zu digitalen Aufklärung. In vielen Bereichen ist die Plattform State of the Art und ist den international bekannteren Plattformen zumindest ebenbürtig. Gerade bei der Entwicklung und Anwendung von neuen Lehr- und Lernmethoden und deren technischer Unterstützung ist openHPI auch international richtungsweisend. Die vorliegende Dissertation befasst sich mit den Möglichkeiten der technischen und didaktischen Unterstützung von bewertbaren Aufgabenstellungen in MOOCs, die im Team zu bearbeiten sind. Durch die Größe der Kurse—in der Regel steht hier ein kleines Teaching Team mehreren tausend Teilnehmern gegenüber—ist eine manuelle Bewertung der Teilnehmenden durch die Lehrenden nicht möglich. Hier wird eine der alternativen Möglichkeiten zur Bewertung von Aufgaben, das sogenannte Peer Assessment, eingesetzt und für die speziellen Gegebenheiten der Bearbeitung von Aufgaben im Team angepasst. In den vergangenen fünf Jahren wurde eine iterative Langzeitstudie durchgeführt, bei der verschiedene qualitative und quantitative Methoden der Auswertung eingesetzt wurden. Das Ergebnis dieser Forschungsarbeit ist eine tiefgehende Einsicht in die Mechanismen der Teamarbeit in skalierenden digitalen Lernplattformen sowie eine Reihe von Empfehlungen zur weiteren Verbesserung der kollaborativen Eigenschaften der HPI-Plattformen, die zum Teil bereits umgesetzt wurden bzw. gerade umgesetzt werden. T2 - Benotete Teamaufgaben in skalierenden E-Learning-Systemen KW - massive open online courses KW - MOOC KW - collaborative learning KW - online learning KW - teamwork KW - peer assessment KW - digital learning KW - eLearning KW - collaborative work KW - kollaboratives Lernen KW - kollaboratives Arbeiten KW - digitales Lernen KW - MOOC KW - Massive Open Online Courses KW - Online-Lernen KW - Peer Assessment KW - Teamarbeit KW - eLearning Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-471830 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Chujfi-La-Roche, Salim A1 - Meinel, Christoph T1 - Matching cognitively sympathetic individual styles to develop collective intelligence in digital communities JF - AI & society : the journal of human-centred systems and machine intelligence N2 - Creation, collection and retention of knowledge in digital communities is an activity that currently requires being explicitly targeted as a secure method of keeping intellectual capital growing in the digital era. In particular, we consider it relevant to analyze and evaluate the empathetic cognitive personalities and behaviors that individuals now have with the change from face-to-face communication (F2F) to computer-mediated communication (CMC) online. This document proposes a cyber-humanistic approach to enhance the traditional SECI knowledge management model. A cognitive perception is added to its cyclical process following design thinking interaction, exemplary for improvement of the method in which knowledge is continuously created, converted and shared. In building a cognitive-centered model, we specifically focus on the effective identification and response to cognitive stimulation of individuals, as they are the intellectual generators and multiplicators of knowledge in the online environment. Our target is to identify how geographically distributed-digital-organizations should align the individual's cognitive abilities to promote iteration and improve interaction as a reliable stimulant of collective intelligence. The new model focuses on analyzing the four different stages of knowledge processing, where individuals with sympathetic cognitive personalities can significantly boost knowledge creation in a virtual social system. For organizations, this means that multidisciplinary individuals can maximize their extensive potential, by externalizing their knowledge in the correct stage of the knowledge creation process, and by collaborating with their appropriate sympathetically cognitive remote peers. KW - argumentation research KW - cyber humanistic KW - cognition KW - collaboration KW - knowledge building KW - knowledge management KW - teamwork KW - virtual groups Y1 - 2017 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0780-x SN - 0951-5666 SN - 1435-5655 VL - 35 IS - 1 SP - 5 EP - 15 PB - Springer CY - New York ER -