TY - JOUR
A1 - Chan, Sander
A1 - Boran, Idil
A1 - van Asselt, Harro
A1 - Iacobuta, Gabriela
A1 - Niles, Navam
A1 - Rietig, Katharine
A1 - Scobie, Michelle
A1 - Bansard, Jennifer S.
A1 - Delgado Pugley, Deborah
A1 - Delina, Laurence L.
A1 - Eichhorn, Friederike
A1 - Ellinger, Paula
A1 - Enechi, Okechukwu
A1 - Hale, Thomas
A1 - Hermwille, Lukas
A1 - Hickmann, Thomas
A1 - Honegger, Matthias
A1 - Hurtado Epstein, Andrea
A1 - Theuer, Stephanie La Hoz
A1 - Mizo, Robert
A1 - Sun, Yixian
A1 - Toussaint, Patrick
A1 - Wambugu, Geoffrey
T1 - Promises and risks of nonstate action in climate and sustainability governance
JF - Wiley interdisciplinary reviews : Climate change
KW - climate change
KW - governance
KW - nonstate actions
KW - SDGs
KW - sustainable development
Y1 - 2019
U6 - https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.572
SN - 1757-7780
SN - 1757-7799
VL - 10
IS - 3
PB - Wiley
CY - Hoboken
ER -
TY - JOUR
A1 - Hickmann, Thomas
A1 - Stehle, Fee
T1 - The Embeddedness of Urban Climate Politics in Multilevel Governance
BT - a Case Study of South Africa’s Major Cities
JF - The journal of environment & development : a review of international policy
N2 - Numerous scholars have lately highlighted the importance of cities in the global response to climate change. However, we still have little systematic knowledge on the evolution of urban climate politics in the Global South. In particular, we lack empirical studies that examine how local climate actions arise in political-administrative systems of developing and emerging economies. Therefore, this article adopts a multilevel governance perspective to explore the climate mitigation responses of three major cities in South Africa by looking at their vertical and horizontal integration in the wider governance framework. In the absence of a coherent national climate policy, Johannesburg, Cape Town, and Durban have developed distinct climate actions within their jurisdictions. In their effort to address climate change, transnational city networks have provided considerable technical support to these cities. Yet, substantial domestic political-economic obstacles hinder the three cities to develop a more ambitious stance on climate change.
KW - climate change
KW - developing and emerging economies
KW - local climate policy making
KW - multilevel governance
KW - South Africa
KW - transnational city networks
Y1 - 2018
U6 - https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496518819121
SN - 1070-4965
SN - 1552-5465
VL - 28
IS - 1
SP - 54
EP - 77
PB - Sage Publ.
CY - Thousand Oaks
ER -
TY - JOUR
A1 - Hickmann, Thomas
A1 - Widerberg, Oscar
A1 - Lederer, Markus
A1 - Pattberg, Philipp H.
T1 - The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Secretariat as an orchestrator in global climate policymaking
JF - International review of administrative sciences : an international journal of comparative public administration
N2 - Scholars have recently devoted increasing attention to the role and function of international bureaucracies in global policymaking. Some of them contend that international public officials have gained significant political influence in various policy fields. Compared to other international bureaucracies, the political leeway of the Secretariat of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change has been considered rather limited. Due to the specific problem structure of the policy domain of climate change, national governments endowed this intergovernmental treaty secretariat with a relatively narrow mandate. However, this article argues that in the past few years, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Secretariat has gradually loosened its straitjacket and expanded its original spectrum of activity by engaging different sub-national and non-state actors into a policy dialogue using facilitative orchestration as a mode of governance. The present article explores the recent evolution of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Secretariat and investigates the way in which it initiates, guides, broadens and strengthens sub-national and non-state climate actions to achieve progress in the international climate negotiations.
Points for practitioners
The Secretariat of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change has lately adopted new roles and functions in global climate policymaking. While previously seen as a rather technocratic body that, first and foremost, serves national governments, the Climate Secretariat increasingly interacts with sub-national governments, civil society organizations and private companies to push the global response to climate change forward. We contend that the Climate Secretariat can contribute to global climate policymaking by coordinating and steering the initiatives of non-nation-state actors towards coherence and good practice.
KW - climate change
KW - environmental policymaking
KW - intergovernmental relations
KW - international bureaucracies
KW - sub-national and non-state actors
Y1 - 2021
U6 - https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852319840425
SN - 0020-8523
SN - 1461-7226
VL - 87
IS - 1
SP - 21
EP - 38
PB - Sage
CY - Los Angeles, Calif. [u.a.]
ER -