TY - JOUR A1 - Weinelt, Ferdinand Anton A1 - Stegemann, Miriam Songa A1 - Theloe, Anja A1 - Pfäfflin, Frieder A1 - Achterberg, Stephan A1 - Weber, Franz A1 - Dübel, Lucas A1 - Mikolajewska, Agata A1 - Uhrig, Alexander A1 - Kiessling, Peggy A1 - Huisinga, Wilhelm A1 - Michelet, Robin A1 - Hennig, Stefanie A1 - Kloft, Charlotte T1 - Evaluation of a meropenem and piperacillin monitoring program in intensive care unit patients calls for the regular assessment of empirical targets and easy-to-use dosing decision tools JF - Antibiotics : open access journal N2 - The drug concentrations targeted in meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam therapy also depend on the susceptibility of the pathogen. Yet, the pathogen is often unknown, and antibiotic therapy is guided by empirical targets. To reliably achieve the targeted concentrations, dosing needs to be adjusted for renal function. We aimed to evaluate a meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam monitoring program in intensive care unit (ICU) patients by assessing (i) the adequacy of locally selected empirical targets, (ii) if dosing is adequately adjusted for renal function and individual target, and (iii) if dosing is adjusted in target attainment (TA) failure. In a prospective, observational clinical trial of drug concentrations, relevant patient characteristics and microbiological data (pathogen, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)) for patients receiving meropenem or piperacillin/tazobactam treatment were collected. If the MIC value was available, a target range of 1-5 x MIC was selected for minimum drug concentrations of both drugs. If the MIC value was not available, 8-40 mg/L and 16-80 mg/L were selected as empirical target ranges for meropenem and piperacillin, respectively. A total of 356 meropenem and 216 piperacillin samples were collected from 108 and 96 ICU patients, respectively. The vast majority of observed MIC values was lower than the empirical target (meropenem: 90.0%, piperacillin: 93.9%), suggesting empirical target value reductions. TA was found to be low (meropenem: 35.7%, piperacillin 50.5%) with the lowest TA for severely impaired renal function (meropenem: 13.9%, piperacillin: 29.2%), and observed drug concentrations did not significantly differ between patients with different targets, indicating dosing was not adequately adjusted for renal function or target. Dosing adjustments were rare for both drugs (meropenem: 6.13%, piperacillin: 4.78%) and for meropenem irrespective of TA, revealing that concentration monitoring alone was insufficient to guide dosing adjustment. Empirical targets should regularly be assessed and adjusted based on local susceptibility data. To improve TA, scientific knowledge should be translated into easy-to-use dosing strategies guiding antibiotic dosing. KW - meropenem KW - piperacillin/tazobactam KW - antimicrobial stewardship KW - critically ill KW - antibiotics KW - pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11060758 SN - 2079-6382 VL - 11 IS - 6 PB - MDPI CY - Basel ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Stachanow, Viktoria A1 - Neumann, Uta A1 - Blankenstein, Oliver A1 - Bindellini, Davide A1 - Melin, Johanna A1 - Ross, Richard A1 - Whitaker, Martin J. J. A1 - Huisinga, Wilhelm A1 - Michelet, Robin A1 - Kloft, Charlotte T1 - Exploring dried blood spot cortisol concentrations as an alternative for monitoring pediatric adrenal insufficiency patients BT - a model-based analysis JF - Frontiers in pharmacology N2 - Congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) is the most common form of adrenal insufficiency in childhood; it requires cortisol replacement therapy with hydrocortisone (HC, synthetic cortisol) from birth and therapy monitoring for successful treatment. In children, the less invasive dried blood spot (DBS) sampling with whole blood including red blood cells (RBCs) provides an advantageous alternative to plasma sampling. Potential differences in binding/association processes between plasma and DBS however need to be considered to correctly interpret DBS measurements for therapy monitoring. While capillary DBS samples would be used in clinical practice, venous cortisol DBS samples from children with adrenal insufficiency were analyzed due to data availability and to directly compare and thus understand potential differences between venous DBS and plasma. A previously published HC plasma pharmacokinetic (PK) model was extended by leveraging these DBS concentrations. In addition to previously characterized binding of cortisol to albumin (linear process) and corticosteroid-binding globulin (CBG; saturable process), DBS data enabled the characterization of a linear cortisol association with RBCs, and thereby providing a quantitative link between DBS and plasma cortisol concentrations. The ratio between the observed cortisol plasma and DBS concentrations varies highly from 2 to 8. Deterministic simulations of the different cortisol binding/association fractions demonstrated that with higher blood cortisol concentrations, saturation of cortisol binding to CBG was observed, leading to an increase in all other cortisol binding fractions. In conclusion, a mathematical PK model was developed which links DBS measurements to plasma exposure and thus allows for quantitative interpretation of measurements of DBS samples. KW - adrenal insufficiency KW - cortisol KW - dried blood spots KW - pediatrics KW - pharmacokinetics KW - binding KW - association KW - red blood cells Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.819590 SN - 1663-9812 VL - 13 PB - Frontiers Media CY - Lausanne ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Nassar, Yomna M. A1 - Hohmann, Nicolas A1 - Michelet, Robin A1 - Gottwalt, Katharina A1 - Meid, Andreas D. A1 - Burhenne, Jürgen A1 - Huisinga, Wilhelm A1 - Haefeli, Walter E. A1 - Mikus, Gerd A1 - Kloft, Charlotte T1 - Quantification of the Time Course of CYP3A Inhibition, Activation, and Induction Using a Population Pharmacokinetic Model of Microdosed Midazolam Continuous Infusion JF - Clinical Pharmacokinetics N2 - Background Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A contributes to the metabolism of many approved drugs. CYP3A perpetrator drugs can profoundly alter the exposure of CYP3A substrates. However, effects of such drug-drug interactions are usually reported as maximum effects rather than studied as time-dependent processes. Identification of the time course of CYP3A modulation can provide insight into when significant changes to CYP3A activity occurs, help better design drug-drug interaction studies, and manage drug-drug interactions in clinical practice. Objective We aimed to quantify the time course and extent of the in vivo modulation of different CYP3A perpetrator drugs on hepatic CYP3A activity and distinguish different modulatory mechanisms by their time of onset, using pharmacologically inactive intravenous microgram doses of the CYP3A-specific substrate midazolam, as a marker of CYP3A activity. Methods Twenty-four healthy individuals received an intravenous midazolam bolus followed by a continuous infusion for 10 or 36 h. Individuals were randomized into four arms: within each arm, two individuals served as a placebo control and, 2 h after start of the midazolam infusion, four individuals received the CYP3A perpetrator drug: voriconazole (inhibitor, orally or intravenously), rifampicin (inducer, orally), or efavirenz (activator, orally). After midazolam bolus administration, blood samples were taken every hour (rifampicin arm) or every 15 min (remaining study arms) until the end of midazolam infusion. A total of 1858 concentrations were equally divided between midazolam and its metabolite, 1'-hydroxymidazolam. A nonlinear mixed-effects population pharmacokinetic model of both compounds was developed using NONMEM (R). CYP3A activity modulation was quantified over time, as the relative change of midazolam clearance encountered by the perpetrator drug, compared to the corresponding clearance value in the placebo arm. Results Time course of CYP3A modulation and magnitude of maximum effect were identified for each perpetrator drug. While efavirenz CYP3A activation was relatively fast and short, reaching a maximum after approximately 2-3 h, the induction effect of rifampicin could only be observed after 22 h, with a maximum after approximately 28-30 h followed by a steep drop to almost baseline within 1-2 h. In contrast, the inhibitory impact of both oral and intravenous voriconazole was prolonged with a steady inhibition of CYP3A activity followed by a gradual increase in the inhibitory effect until the end of sampling at 8 h. Relative maximum clearance changes were +59.1%, +46.7%, -70.6%, and -61.1% for efavirenz, rifampicin, oral voriconazole, and intravenous voriconazole, respectively. Conclusions We could distinguish between different mechanisms of CYP3A modulation by the time of onset. Identification of the time at which clearance significantly changes, per perpetrator drug, can guide the design of an optimal sampling schedule for future drug-drug interaction studies. The impact of a short-term combination of different perpetrator drugs on the paradigm CYP3A substrate midazolam was characterized and can define combination intervals in which no relevant interaction is to be expected. Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-022-01175-6 SN - 0312-5963 SN - 1179-1926 VL - 61 IS - 11 SP - 1595 EP - 1607 PB - Springer CY - Northcote ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Mueller-Schoell, Anna A1 - Groenland, Stefanie L. A1 - Scherf-Clavel, Oliver A1 - van Dyk, Madele A1 - Huisinga, Wilhelm A1 - Michelet, Robin A1 - Jaehde, Ulrich A1 - Steeghs, Neeltje A1 - Huitema, Alwin D. R. A1 - Kloft, Charlotte T1 - Therapeutic drug monitoring of oral targeted antineoplastic drugs JF - European journal of clinical pharmacology N2 - Purpose This review provides an overview of the current challenges in oral targeted antineoplastic drug (OAD) dosing and outlines the unexploited value of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Factors influencing the pharmacokinetic exposure in OAD therapy are depicted together with an overview of different TDM approaches. Finally, current evidence for TDM for all approved OADs is reviewed. Methods A comprehensive literature search (covering literature published until April 2020), including primary and secondary scientific literature on pharmacokinetics and dose individualisation strategies for OADs, together with US FDA Clinical Pharmacology and Biopharmaceutics Reviews and the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use European Public Assessment Reports was conducted. Results OADs are highly potent drugs, which have substantially changed treatment options for cancer patients. Nevertheless, high pharmacokinetic variability and low treatment adherence are risk factors for treatment failure. TDM is a powerful tool to individualise drug dosing, ensure drug concentrations within the therapeutic window and increase treatment success rates. After reviewing the literature for 71 approved OADs, we show that exposure-response and/or exposure-toxicity relationships have been established for the majority. Moreover, TDM has been proven to be feasible for individualised dosing of abiraterone, everolimus, imatinib, pazopanib, sunitinib and tamoxifen in prospective studies. There is a lack of experience in how to best implement TDM as part of clinical routine in OAD cancer therapy. Conclusion Sub-therapeutic concentrations and severe adverse events are current challenges in OAD treatment, which can both be addressed by the application of TDM-guided dosing, ensuring concentrations within the therapeutic window. KW - targeted antineoplastic drugs KW - tyrosine kinase inhibitors KW - therapeutic KW - drug monitoring KW - oral anticancer drugs KW - personalised medicine Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-020-03014-8 SN - 0031-6970 SN - 1432-1041 VL - 77 IS - 4 SP - 441 EP - 464 PB - Springer CY - Heidelberg ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kluwe, Franziska A1 - Michelet, Robin A1 - Müller-Schöll, Anna A1 - Maier, Corinna A1 - Klopp-Schulze, Lena A1 - van Dyk, Madele A1 - Mikus, Gerd A1 - Huisinga, Wilhelm A1 - Kloft, Charlotte T1 - Perspectives on model-informed precision dosing in the digital health era BT - challenges, opportunities, and recommendations JF - Clinical pharmacology & therapeutics Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.2049 SN - 0009-9236 SN - 1532-6535 VL - 109 IS - 1 SP - 29 EP - 36 PB - Wiley CY - Hoboken ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Démaris, Alix A1 - Widigson, Ella S. K. A1 - Ilvemark, Johan F. K. F. A1 - Steenholdt, Casper A1 - Seidelin, Jakob B. A1 - Huisinga, Wilhelm A1 - Michelet, Robin A1 - Aulin, Linda B. S. A1 - Kloft, Charlotte T1 - Ulcerative colitis and acute severe ulcerative colitis patients are overlooked in infliximab population pharmacokinetic models BT - results from a comprehensive review JF - Pharmaceutics / Molecular Diversity Preservation International N2 - Ulcerative colitis (UC) is part of the inflammatory bowels diseases, and moderate to severe UC patients can be treated with anti-tumour necrosis alpha monoclonal antibodies, including infliximab (IFX). Even though treatment of UC patients by IFX has been in place for over a decade, many gaps in modelling of IFX PK in this population remain. This is even more true for acute severe UC (ASUC) patients for which early prediction of IFX pharmacokinetic (PK) could highly improve treatment outcome. Thus, this review aims to compile and analyse published population PK models of IFX in UC and ASUC patients, and to assess the current knowledge on disease activity impact on IFX PK. For this, a semi-systematic literature search was conducted, from which 26 publications including a population PK model analysis of UC patients receiving IFX therapy were selected. Amongst those, only four developed a model specifically for UC patients, and only three populations included severe UC patients. Investigations of disease activity impact on PK were reported in only 4 of the 14 models selected. In addition, the lack of reported model codes and assessment of predictive performance make the use of published models in a clinical setting challenging. Thus, more comprehensive investigation of PK in UC and ASUC is needed as well as more adequate reports on developed models and their evaluation in order to apply them in a clinical setting. KW - infliximab KW - inflammatory bowel disease KW - ulcerative colitis KW - acute severe KW - disease activity KW - pharmacokinetic KW - pharmacometrics Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14102095 SN - 1999-4923 VL - 14 IS - 10 PB - MDPI CY - Basel ER -