TY  - JOUR
A1  - Pipin, Valerij V.
A1  - Seehafer, Norbert
T1  - Stellar dynamos with Omega x J effect
N2  - Context. The standard dynamo model for the solar and stellar magnetic fields is based on the $alphaOmega$ mechanism, namely, an interplay between differential rotation (the $Omega$ effect) and a mean electromotive force generated by helical turbulent convection flows (the $alpha$ effect). There are, however, a number of problems with the $alpha$ effect and $alphaOmega$ dynamo models. Two of them are that, in the case of the Sun, the obtained cycle periods are too short and the magnetic activity is not sufficiently concentrated at low latitudes. Aims. We explore the role of turbulent induction effects that may appear in addition to the $alpha$ effect. The additional effects result from the combined action of rotation and an inhomogeneity of the large-scale magnetic field. The best known of them is the $vec{Omega}	imesvec{J}$ effect. We also include anisotropic diffusion and a new dynamo term that is of third order in the rotation vector $vec{Omega}$. Methods. We studied axisymmetric mean-field dynamo models containing differential rotation, the $alpha$ effect, and the additional turbulent induction effects. The model calculations were carried out using the rotation profile of the Sun as obtained from helioseismic measurements and radial profiles of other quantities according to a standard model of the solar interior. In addition, we consider a dynamo model for a full sphere that is based solely on the joint induction effects of rotation and an inhomogeneity of the large-scale magnetic field, without differential rotation and the $alpha$ effect (a $delta^{2}$ dynamo model). This kind of dynamo model may be relevant for fully convective stars. Results. With respect to the solar dynamo, the inclusion of the additional turbulent induction effects increases the period of the dynamo and brings the large-scale toroidal field closer to the equator, thus improving the agreement of the models with the observations. For the $delta^{2}$ dynamo working in a full sphere, we find dynamo modes that are steady if the effect of anisotropic diffusion is not included. The inclusion of anisotropic diffusion yields a magnetic field oscillating with a period close to the turbulent magnetic diffusion time.
Y1  - 2009
UR  - http://www.aanda.org/index.php?option=article&access=doi&doi=10.1051/0004-6361:200810766
U6  - https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:200810766
SN  - 0004-6361
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Kuzanyan, Kirill M.
A1  - Pipin, Valerij V.
A1  - Seehafer, Norbert
T1  - The alpha effect and the observed twist and current helicity of solar magnetic fields
N2  - We present a straightforward comparison of model calculations for the alpha-effect, helicities, and magnetic field line twist in the solar convection zone with magnetic field observations at atmospheric levels. The model calculations are carried out in a mixing-length approximation for the turbulence with a profile of the solar internal rotation rate obtained from helioseismic inversions. The magnetic field data consist of photospheric vector magnetograms of 422 active regions for which spatially-averaged values of the force-free twist parameter and of the current helicity density are calculated, which are then used to determine latitudinal profiles of these quantities. The comparison of the model calculations with the observations suggests that the observed twist and helicity are generated in the bulk of the convection zone, rather than in a layer close to the bottom. This supports two-layer dynamo models where the large-scale toroidal field is generated by differential rotation in a thin layer at the bottom while the alpha-effect is operating in the bulk of the convection zone. Our previous observational finding was that the moduli of the twist factor and of the current helicity density increase rather steeply from zero at the equator towards higher latitudes and attain a certain saturation at about 12 - 15 degrees. In our dynamo model with algebraic nonlinearity, the increase continues, however, to higher latitudes and is more gradual. This could be due to the neglect of the coupling between small-scale and large-scale current and magnetic helicities and of the latitudinal drift of the activity belts in the model
Y1  - 2006
UR  - http://www.springerlink.com/content/100339
U6  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-006-1636-6
SN  - 0038-0938
ER  -