TY - JOUR A1 - Stoppel, Relika T1 - Alcohol availability and alcohol-attributable mortality BT - economic implications following a change in sales policy JF - CESifo economic studies : CESifo, a joint initiative of the University of Munich's Center for Economic Studies and the Ifo Institute N2 - It is commonly known that irresponsible alcohol use can have adverse effects. For some people, it results in health problems, for others in productivity loss, and some experience the worst possible outcome of alcohol misuse - death. This paper estimates the effect of reduced alcohol sales hours on alcohol-attributable mortality (AAM) in Estonia. Using novel mortality data from 1997 to 2015, this paper analyzes the effect of alcohol sales policies at both the county level and the country level. By applying the difference-in-differences method and the ARIMA model, this paper finds that the alcohol sales policy reduced AAM to between 1.710 and 2.401 deaths per 100,000 per month, which equals a reduction of 31% to 40% in AAM deaths. These findings suggest that individuals who are the most at risk of dying from alcohol-attributable causes of death benefit remarkably from reduced alcohol availability. KW - health policy KW - mortality KW - public health KW - alcohol Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1093/cesifo/ifab008 SN - 1610-241X SN - 1612-7501 VL - 67 IS - 4 SP - 463 EP - 487 PB - Oxford Univ. Press CY - Oxford ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Khudair, Mohammed A1 - Marcuzzi, Anna A1 - Ng, Kwok A1 - Tempest, Gavin Daniel A1 - Bartoš, František A1 - Peric, Ratko A1 - Maier, Maximilian A1 - Beccia, Flavia A1 - Boccia, Stefania A1 - Brandes, Mirko A1 - Cardon, Greet A1 - Carlin, Angela A1 - Castagna, Carolina A1 - Chaabene, Helmi A1 - Chalkley, Anna A1 - Ciaccioni, Simone A1 - Cieślińska-Świder, Joanna A1 - Čingienė, Vilma A1 - Cortis, Cristina A1 - Corvino, Chiara A1 - de Geus, Eco J. C. A1 - Di Baldassarre, Angela A1 - Di Credico, Andrea A1 - Drid, Patrik A1 - Tarazaga, Rosa Ma Fernández A1 - Gallè, Francesca A1 - Sánchez, Esther Garcia A1 - Gebremariam, Mekdes A1 - Ghinassi, Barbara A1 - Goudas, Marios A1 - Hayes, Grainne A1 - Honorio, Samuel A1 - Izzicupo, Pascal A1 - Jahre, Henriette A1 - Jelsma, Judith A1 - Juric, Petra A1 - Kolovelonis, Athanasios A1 - Kongsvold, Atle A1 - Kouidi, Evangelia A1 - Mansergh, Fiona A1 - Masanovic, Bojan A1 - Mekonnen, Teferi A1 - Mork, Paul Jarle A1 - Murphy, Marie A1 - O'Hara, Kelly A1 - Torun, Ayse Ozbil A1 - Palumbo, Federico A1 - Popovic, Stevo A1 - Prieske, Olaf A1 - Puharic, Zrinka A1 - Ribeiro, José Carlos A1 - Rumbold, Penny Louise Sheena A1 - Sandu, Petru A1 - Soric, Maroje A1 - Stavnsbo, Mette A1 - Syrmpas, Ioannis A1 - van der Ploeg, Hidde P. A1 - Van Hoye, Aurélie A1 - Vilela, Sofia A1 - Woods, Catherine A1 - Wunsch, Kathrin A1 - Caprinica, Laura A1 - MacDonncha, Ciaran A1 - Ling, Fiona Chun Man T1 - DE-PASS Best Evidence Statement (BESt): modifiable determinants of physical activity and sedentary behaviour in children and adolescents aged 5-19 years-a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis JF - BMJ open N2 - Introduction Physical activity among children and adolescents remains insufficient, despite the substantial efforts made by researchers and policymakers. Identifying and furthering our understanding of potential modifiable determinants of physical activity behaviour (PAB) and sedentary behaviour (SB) is crucial for the development of interventions that promote a shift from SB to PAB. The current protocol details the process through which a series of systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses (MAs) will be conducted to produce a best-evidence statement (BESt) and inform policymakers. The overall aim is to identify modifiable determinants that are associated with changes in PAB and SB in children and adolescents (aged 5-19 years) and to quantify their effect on, or association with, PAB/SB. Methods and analysis A search will be performed in MEDLINE, SportDiscus, Web of Science, PsychINFO and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled trials (CTs) that investigate the effect of interventions on PAB/SB and longitudinal studies that investigate the associations between modifiable determinants and PAB/SB at multiple time points will be sought. Risk of bias assessments will be performed using adapted versions of Cochrane's RoB V.2.0 and ROBINS-I tools for RCTs and CTs, respectively, and an adapted version of the National Institute of Health's tool for longitudinal studies. Data will be synthesised narratively and, where possible, MAs will be performed using frequentist and Bayesian statistics. Modifiable determinants will be discussed considering the settings in which they were investigated and the PAB/SB measurement methods used. Ethics and dissemination No ethical approval is needed as no primary data will be collected. The findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications and academic conferences where possible. The BESt will also be shared with policy makers within the DE-PASS consortium in the first instance. Systematic review registration CRD42021282874. KW - public health KW - health policy KW - community child health Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059202 SN - 2044-6055 VL - 12 IS - 9 PB - BMJ Publishing Group CY - London ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kühne, Katharina A1 - Jeglinski-Mende, Melinda A. T1 - Refraining from interaction can decrease fear of physical closeness during COVID-19 JF - Scientific reports N2 - Perception of peripersonal space (PPS) and interpersonal distance (IPD) has been shown to be modified by external factors such as perceived danger, the use of tools, and social factors. Especially in times of social distancing in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is vital to study factors that modify PPS and IPD. The present work addresses the question of whether wearing a face mask as a protection tool and social interaction impact the perception of IPD. We tested estimated IPD in pictures at three distances: 50 cm, 90 cm, and 150 cm in both social interaction (shaking hands) and without interaction and when the two people in the pictures wore a face mask or not. Data from 60 subjects were analyzed in a linear mixed model (on both difference in distance estimation to the depicted distance and in absolute distance estimation) and in a 3 (distance: 50, 90, 150) x 2 (interaction: no interaction, shake hands), x 2 face mask (no mask, mask) rmANOVA on distance estimation difference. All analyses showed that at a distance of 50 and 90 cm, participants generally underestimated the IPD while at an IPD of 150 cm, participants overestimated the distance. This could be grounded in perceived danger and avoidance behavior at closer distances, while the wider distance between persons was not perceived as dangerous. Our findings at an IPD of 90 cm show that social interaction has the largest effect at the border of our PPS, while the face mask did not affect social interaction at either distance. In addition, the ANOVA results indicate that when no social interaction was displayed, participants felt less unsafe when depicted persons wore a face mask at distances of 90 and 150 cm. This shows that participants are on the one hand aware of the given safety measures and internalized them; on the other hand, that refraining from physical social interaction helps to get close to other persons. KW - health policy KW - human behaviour Y1 - 2023 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34667-x SN - 2045-2322 VL - 13 IS - 1 PB - Nature portfolio CY - London ER -