TY - JOUR A1 - Caliendo, Marco A1 - Clement, Michel A1 - Papies, Dominik A1 - Scheel-Kopeinig, Sabine T1 - The cost impact of spam filters measuring the effect of information system technologies in organizations JF - Information systems research N2 - Dealing with spam is very costly, and many organizations have tried to reduce spam-related costs by installing spam filters. Relying on modern econometric methods to reduce the selection bias of installing a spam filter, we use a unique data setting implemented at a German university to measure the costs associated with spam and the costs savings of spam filters. Our methodological framework accounts for effect heterogeneity and can be easily used to estimate the effect of other IS technologies implemented in organizations. The majority of costs stem from the time that employees spend identifying and deleting spam, amounting to an average of approximately five minutes per employee per day. Our analysis, which accounts for selection bias, finds that the installation of a spam filter reduces these costs by roughly one third. Failing to account for the selection bias would lead to a result that suggests that installing a spam filter does not reduce working time losses. However, cost savings only occur when the spam burden is high, indicating that spam filters do not necessarily reduce costs and are therefore no universal remedy. The analysis further shows that spam filters alone are a countermeasure against spam that exhibits only limited effectiveness because they only reduce costs by one third. KW - spam KW - spam filter KW - selection bias KW - propensity score matching Y1 - 2012 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1110.0396 SN - 1047-7047 VL - 23 IS - 3 SP - 1068 EP - 1080 PB - INFORMS CY - Hannover ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Caliendo, Marco A1 - Clement, Michel A1 - Shehu, Edlira T1 - The effect of individual professional critics on books' sales: capturing selection biases from observable and unobservable factors JF - Marketing letters : a journal of research in marketing N2 - We propose a combined approach of propensity score matching with difference-in-differences methods for reducing selection biases of products being reviewed by critics. Critics' decision to review products may be driven by observable (e.g., star power) and unobservable (e.g., critics' individual preferences) factors, raising the question of reverse causality and selection biases. Our proposed approach enables to rigorously control for selection biases by observable and unobservable characteristics. We apply our methodological framework on data from the German book market and estimate the sales effect of a well-known TV critic. We identify substantial selection effects of individual critics, which result in serious underestimation of the short-term effect (up to 29 %) and the long-term effect (up to 37 %). The results emphasize the relevance of the proposed methodological framework by demonstrating that observable and unobservable factors drive selection effects. KW - Critics KW - Reviewer KW - Propensity score matching KW - Difference-in-difference KW - Selection effects Y1 - 2015 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-015-9391-9 SN - 0923-0645 SN - 1573-059X VL - 26 IS - 4 SP - 423 EP - 436 PB - Springer CY - Dordrecht ER -