TY - THES A1 - Spörer, Nadine T1 - Strategie und Lernerfolg : Validierung eines Interviews zum selbstgesteuerten Lernen N2 - In einer Längsschnittstudie mit 215 Schülern der achten Klasse wurde der Zusammenhang zwischen selbstgesteuertem Lernen, motivationalen (Zielorientierungen, Selbstwirksamkeit, schulischer Affekt) und kognitiven Variablen (Intelligenz) sowie Leistungsindikatoren (Schulleistung, Noten) erhoben. Selbstgesteuertes Lernen wurde mit Hilfe eines strukturierten Interviews (Zimmerman, 1986) und eines Lernstrategie-Fragebogens erfasst. Zum einen zeigte sich, dass die Lernstrategie-Angaben im Interview und im Fragebogen in keiner bedeutsamen Beziehung zueinander standen. Zum anderen ergaben sich deutliche Unterschiede in der Vorhersage der Leistungsindikatoren. Die per Interview erfassten Lernstrategien besaßen sowohl Vorhersagekraft bezüglich Schulnoten und Schulleistung und zeigten signifikante Zusammenhänge zu den individuellen Zielorientierungen, dem schulischen Affekt und der Selbstwirksamkeit. Darüber hinaus konnten Leistungsveränderungen von der achten zur neunten Klasse vorhergesagt werden. Der parallel eingesetzte Lernstrategie-Fragebogen leistete im Vergleich dazu keine Erklärung der Leistungsvarianz. Implikationen für die Diagnostik selbstgesteuerten Lernens werden diskutiert. N2 - This longitudinal study examined relationships between self-regulated learning, motivational orientations, self-efficacy and academic performance in a sample of 215 8th-graders. Self-regulated learning was assessed with both a German adaptation of the Self-Regulated Learning Interview (Zimmerman & Martinez-Pons, 1986) and a learning strategy questionnaire. Results indicated that strategies students reported in the interview were nearly 0-correlated with their answers in the questionnaire. Questionnaire scores did not predict changes in grades and achievement test scores over one year, but learning strategies assessed with the interview did. Further deep-processing strategies were positively related with self-efficacy and task-orientation. Implications for the assessment of self-regulated learning are discussed. ---- Anmerkung: Die Autorin ist Trägerin des von der Universitätsgesellschaft Potsdam e.V. vergebenen Wissenschaftspreises zur Förderung des wissenschaftlichen Nachwuchses für die beste Dissertation des Jahres 2003/2004 an der Universität Potsdam. KW - Selbstgesteuertes Lernen KW - Lernstrategien KW - Schulleistung KW - self-regulated learning KW - learning strategies KW - achievement Y1 - 2003 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-0001363 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Hermanns, Jolanda T1 - Scaffolding for chemistry students – which tools are assessed as being more helpful BT - Stepped supporting tools or task navigators? JF - Chemistry Teacher International N2 - In this paper the use of two different scaffolds in a seminar on the topic of heterocycles is discussed. The students first used both scaffolds (stepped supporting tools and a task navigator) on two tasks and could then choose for one other task the scaffold that suited them more. The scaffolds were evaluated in a mixedmethods study by the use of questionnaires and the conducting of a focus group interview. Both scaffolds were assessed as being helpful. However, students who thought they didn’t need different sorts of tips, as provided by the task navigator, chose the stepped supporting tools. All students reflected on their use of the scaffolds; their choices for one of both are therefore well-founded. As the reasons for choosing the scaffold are very individual, in future seminars both types of scaffolds will be provided. KW - organic chemistry KW - scaffolding KW - self-regulated learning KW - solving of tasks Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2020-0019 SN - 2569-3263 PB - De Gruyter CY - Berlin ER - TY - GEN A1 - Hermanns, Jolanda T1 - Scaffolding for chemistry students – which tools are assessed as being more helpful BT - Stepped supporting tools or task navigators? T2 - Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe N2 - In this paper the use of two different scaffolds in a seminar on the topic of heterocycles is discussed. The students first used both scaffolds (stepped supporting tools and a task navigator) on two tasks and could then choose for one other task the scaffold that suited them more. The scaffolds were evaluated in a mixedmethods study by the use of questionnaires and the conducting of a focus group interview. Both scaffolds were assessed as being helpful. However, students who thought they didn’t need different sorts of tips, as provided by the task navigator, chose the stepped supporting tools. All students reflected on their use of the scaffolds; their choices for one of both are therefore well-founded. As the reasons for choosing the scaffold are very individual, in future seminars both types of scaffolds will be provided. T3 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe - 1108 KW - organic chemistry KW - scaffolding KW - self-regulated learning KW - solving of tasks Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-491001 SN - 1866-8372 IS - 1108 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Muwonge, Charles Magoba A1 - Schiefele, Ulrich A1 - Ssenyonga, Joseph A1 - Kibedi, Henry T1 - Modeling the relationship between motivational beliefs, cognitive learning strategies, and academic performance of teacher education students JF - South African journal of psychology N2 - Although self-regulated learning has received much attention over the past decades, research on how teacher education students regulate their own learning has been scarce, particularly in third world countries. In the present study, we examined the structural relationships between motivational beliefs, cognitive learning strategies, and academic performance among teacher education students in Uganda. The sample comprised of 1081 students selected from seven universities. Data were collected using several subscales from the modified Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire and were analyzed by structural equation modeling. Cognitive learning strategies fully mediated the relationship between motivational beliefs and academic performance. Motivational beliefs contributed to students’ academic performance mainly through influencing their critical thinking and organizational skills. Therefore, interventions to improve teacher education students’ academic performance should focus not only on boosting their motivation but also on enhancing their use of cognitive learning strategies. KW - Academic performance KW - Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire KW - self-regulated learning KW - structural equation modeling KW - teacher education students Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1177/0081246318775547 SN - 0081-2463 SN - 2078-208X VL - 49 IS - 1 SP - 122 EP - 135 PB - Sage Publ. CY - London ER -