TY  - JOUR
A1  - Schnabel, Konrad
A1  - Asendorpf, Jens B.
T1  - Free associations as a measure of stable implicit attitudes
JF  - European journal of personality
N2  - Two studies explored the psychometric properties of free association methods for the assessment of attitudes. Even though the stability of the actual associations was rather low, psychometric properties of the valence estimates of the free associations were highly satisfactory. Valence estimates of associations were provided by independent judges who rated the valence of the associations that were generated by participants. Valence estimates of the associations showed satisfactory internal consistencies and retest reliabilities over three weeks. Additionally, valence estimates of the associations were significantly and independently related to both explicit self-reported attitudes and implicit attitudes that were assessed with an OssiWessi Implicit Association Test. Free association methods represent a useful complement to the family of implicit measures and are especially suitable for the assessment of non-relative attitudes towards single attitude objects.
KW  - free associations
KW  - automatic associations
KW  - automatic attitudes
KW  - social cognition
KW  - implicit measures
Y1  - 2013
U6  - https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1890
SN  - 0890-2070
VL  - 27
IS  - 1
SP  - 39
EP  - 50
PB  - Wiley-Blackwell
CY  - Hoboken
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Asendorpf, Jens B.
A1  - Conner, Mark
A1  - De Fruyt, Filip
A1  - De Houwer, Jan
A1  - Denissen, Jaap J. A.
A1  - Fiedler, Klaus
A1  - Fiedler, Susann
A1  - Funder, David C.
A1  - Kliegl, Reinhold
A1  - Nosek, Brian A.
A1  - Perugini, Marco
A1  - Roberts, Brent W.
A1  - Schmitt, Manfred
A1  - vanAken, Marcel A. G.
A1  - Weber, Hannelore
A1  - Wicherts, Jelte M.
T1  - Recommendations for increasing replicability in psychology
JF  - European journal of personality
N2  - Replicability of findings is at the heart of any empirical science. The aim of this article is to move the current replicability debate in psychology towards concrete recommendations for improvement. We focus on research practices but also offer guidelines for reviewers, editors, journal management, teachers, granting institutions, and university promotion committees, highlighting some of the emerging and existing practical solutions that can facilitate implementation of these recommendations. The challenges for improving replicability in psychological science are systemic. Improvement can occur only if changes are made at many levels of practice, evaluation, and reward.
KW  - replicability
KW  - confirmation bias
KW  - publication bias
KW  - generalizability
KW  - research transparency
Y1  - 2013
U6  - https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1919
SN  - 0890-2070
VL  - 27
IS  - 2
SP  - 108
EP  - 119
PB  - Wiley-Blackwell
CY  - Hoboken
ER  - 
TY  - INPR
A1  - Asendorpf, Jens B.
A1  - Conner, Mark
A1  - De Fruyt, Filip
A1  - De Houwer, Jan
A1  - Denissen, Jaap J. A.
A1  - Fiedler, Klaus
A1  - Fiedler, Susann
A1  - Funder, David C.
A1  - Kliegl, Reinhold
A1  - Nosek, Brian A.
A1  - Perugini, Marco
A1  - Roberts, Brent W.
A1  - Schmitt, Manfred
A1  - Van Aken, Marcel A. G.
A1  - Weber, Hannelore
A1  - Wicherts, Jelte M.
T1  - Replication is more than hitting the lottery twice
T2  - European journal of personality
N2  - The main goal of our target article was to provide concrete recommendations for improving the replicability of research findings. Most of the comments focus on this point. In addition, a few comments were concerned with the distinction between replicability and generalizability and the role of theory in replication. We address all comments within the conceptual structure of the target article and hope to convince readers that replication in psychological science amounts to much more than hitting the lottery twice.
Y1  - 2013
SN  - 0890-2070
VL  - 27
IS  - 2
SP  - 138
EP  - 144
PB  - Wiley-Blackwell
CY  - Hoboken
ER  -