TY - JOUR A1 - Ganghof, Steffen T1 - Is the "Constitution of Equality' Parliamentary, Presidential or Hybrid? JF - Political studies : the journal of the Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom N2 - What does the value of political equality imply for the institutional design of democracies? The existing normative literature highlights the importance of proportional representation and legislative majority rule, but neglects the choice of an executive format. This paper explores two potential egalitarian trade-offs in this choice. First, while presidential systems tend to achieve too little bundling of separable decision-making issues (within political parties), parliamentary systems often tend towards too much bundling (between political parties), thus establishing informal veto positions in the democratic process. This is a trade-off between the adversarial' and deliberative' aspects of equality. Second, there is a trade-off between horizontal' and vertical' equality. Neither pure presidentialism nor pure parliamentarism may be able to maximise both dimensions of equality simultaneously. The paper argues that certain hybrids between parliamentarism and presidentialism have the potential to mitigate both trade-offs. These hybrids establish power separation between the executive and legislature without allowing for popular executive elections. The argument also has potential implications for the democratisation of the European Union. KW - equality KW - democratic theory KW - forms of government KW - institutional design KW - majority rule Y1 - 2015 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12124 SN - 0032-3217 SN - 1467-9248 VL - 63 IS - 4 SP - 814 EP - 829 PB - Wiley-Blackwell CY - Hoboken ER - TY - THES A1 - Kaneza, Elisabeth T1 - Rassische Diskriminierung in Deutschland BT - Verwirklichung eines positiven Rechts für die Gleichberechtigung von Schwarzen Menschen T2 - Schriften des MenschenRechtsZentrums der Universität Potsdam N2 - Diese Arbeit zeigt auf, wie historisch und rechtlich eine Ungleichheit zwischen Schwarzen und Weißen in Deutschland gewachsen ist und geht der Frage nach, welche Anforderungen das Verfassungsrecht, die Rechtspraxis und die Politik erfüllen müssen, um sie auszugleichen. Eingangs wird die Entwicklung des Verbots der rassischen Diskriminierung im internationalen und nationalen Recht dargelegt. Folglich zeichnet die Verfasserin die Diskriminierungsgeschichte von Schwarzen Menschen nach. Zur Überwindung der nach wie vor bestehenden strukturellen Diskriminierung schlägt sie ein positives Recht vor, das sich auf Menschenrechtsstandards und Lösungsansätzen aus Rechtsvergleichen stützt und die Gleichberechtigung von Schwarzen Menschen bewirken soll. N2 - This work shows how historically and legally inequality between blacks and whites has grown in Germany and explores the question of what requirements constitutional law, legal practice and politics must fulfill in order to balance it out. It begins by outlining the development of the prohibition of racial discrimination in international and national law. The author then traces the history of discrimination against Black people. In order to overcome the structural discrimination that still exists, she proposes a positive law based on human rights standards and comparative law approaches to achieve equality for Black people. KW - Deutschland KW - black people KW - Diskriminierung KW - constitutional law KW - Diskriminierungsausgleich KW - evelopment of the prohibition of racial KW - Diskriminierungsgeschichte KW - equality KW - Germany Y1 - 2024 SN - 978-3-7560-1461-3 SN - 978-3-7489-1998-8 U6 - https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748919988 VL - 49 PB - Nomos CY - Baden-Baden ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Schwarzenthal, Miriam A1 - Schachner, Maja Katharina A1 - van de Vijver, Fons J. R. A1 - Juang, Linda P. T1 - Equal but Different BT - effects of equality/inclusion and cultural pluralism on intergroup outcomes in multiethnic classrooms JF - Cultural diversity & ethnic minority psychology : official journal of American Psychological Association Division 45 N2 - Objectives: Integrating research on intergroup contact and intercultural relations, we investigated effects of 2 types of cultural diversity norms (equality/inclusion and cultural pluralism) on outgroup orientation and perceived discrimination among students of immigrant and nonimmigrant background. Method: Our sample comprised 1,975 6th graders (M-age = 11.53, SDage = 0.69, 47% female) in Germany, of whom 1,213 (61%) were of immigrant background, defined as having at least 1 parent born in a different country. A total of 83 countries of origin were represented. We applied a multilevel framework to assess the impact of individual-level and class-level predictors on intergroup outcomes, controlling for the classroom ethnic composition, school track, and individual-level covariates. Immigrant background was treated as a moderator. Results: The 2 types of cultural diversity norms were generally associated with more positive intergroup outcomes. Some of the associations differed in strength between students of immigrant and nonimmigrant background. There were stronger associations of equality/inclusion with higher outgroup orientation among students of nonimmigrant background and with lower perceived discrimination among students of immigrant background. Ethnic composition, as well as the classroom-aggregated diversity norms (diversity climate) showed weaker relations with the outcome variables. Conclusions: Equality/inclusion norms and cultural pluralism norms can make complementary contributions to positive relations between students of immigrant and nonimmigrant background. Equality/inclusion norms foster positive contact and equal treatment, while cultural pluralism norms emphasize that it is also important to value diversity. 1 KW - cultural diversity KW - multiethnic classrooms KW - intergroup relations KW - equality KW - cultural pluralism Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000173 SN - 1099-9809 SN - 1939-0106 VL - 24 IS - 2 SP - 260 EP - 271 PB - American Psychological Association CY - Washington ER -