TY - CHAP A1 - Zimmermann, Andreas ED - Ambos, Kai T1 - Article 124 Transitional provision T2 - Rome statute of the International Criminal Court Y1 - 2022 SN - 978-3-406-77926-8 SN - 978-3-406-74384-9 SN - 978-1-5099-4405-7 SN - 978-3-8487-7648-1 SP - 2905 EP - 2914 PB - Beck CY - München ET - Fourth ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Zimmermann, Andreas ED - Ambos, Kai T1 - Article 15bis. Exercise of jurisdiction over the crime of aggression (State referral, proprio motu) T2 - Rome statute of the International Criminal Court Y1 - 2022 SN - 978-3-406-77926-8 SN - 978-3-406-74384-9 SN - 978-1-5099-4405-7 SN - 978-3-8487-7648-1 U6 - https://doi.org/10.17104/9783406779268-899 SP - 899 EP - 926 PB - Beck CY - München ET - Fourth ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Zimmermann, Andreas A1 - Freiburg, Elisa ED - Triffterer, Otto ED - Ambos, Kai T1 - Article 15bis: Exercise of jurisdiction over the crime of aggression (State referal, proprio motu) T2 - The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court ; a commentary Y1 - 2016 SN - 978-3-406-64854-0 SP - 741 EP - 764 PB - Beck CY - München ET - 3. Aufl ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Zimmermann, Andreas A1 - Freiburg-Braun, Elisa ED - Ambos, Kai T1 - Article 15ter Exercise of jurisdiction over the crime of aggression (Security Council referral) T2 - Rome statute of the International Criminal Court Y1 - 2022 SN - 978-3-406-77926-8 SN - 978-3-406-74384-9 SN - 978-1-5099-4405-7 SN - 978-3-8487-7648-1 U6 - https://doi.org/10.17104/9783406779268-927 SP - 927 EP - 932 PB - Beck CY - München ET - Fourth ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Zimmermann, Andreas ED - Ambos, Kai T1 - Article 5 Crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court T2 - Rome statute of the International Criminal Court Y1 - 2022 SN - 978-3-406-74384-9 SN - 978-3-406-77926-8 SN - 978-1-5099-4405-7 SP - 107 EP - 116 PB - Beck CY - München ET - Fourth ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Zimmermann, Andreas T1 - Article 5: Crimes within the Jurisdiction of the Court T2 - The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court ; a commentary Y1 - 2016 SN - 978-3-406-64854-0 SP - 111 EP - 126 PB - Beck CY - München ET - 3. Aufl. ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Zimmermann, Andreas A1 - Geiß, Robin ED - Ambos, Kai T1 - Article 8 Para. 2(b)(x): Prohibition of physical mutilation T2 - Rome statute of the International Criminal Court Y1 - 2022 SN - 978-3-406-74384-9 SN - 978-3-406-77926-8 SN - 978-1-5099-4405-7 SN - 978-3-8487-7648-1 SP - 419 EP - 436 PB - Beck CY - München ET - 4 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Zimmermann, Andreas A1 - Geiß, Robin ED - Ambos, Kai T1 - Article 8 Para. 2(b)(xiii): Prohibited destruction T2 - Rome statute of the International Criminal Court Y1 - 2022 SN - 978-3-406-74384-9 SN - 978-3-406-77926-8 SN - 978-1-5099-4405-7 SN - 978-3-8487-7648-1 SP - 474 EP - 503 PB - Beck CY - München ET - 4 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Zimmermann, Andreas A1 - Geiß, Robin ED - Ambos, Kai T1 - Article 8 Para. 2(b)(xvi): Pillage T2 - Rome statute of the International Criminal Court Y1 - 2022 SN - 978-3-406-74384-9 SN - 978-3-406-77926-8 SN - 978-1-5099-4405-7 SN - 978-3-8487-7648-1 SP - 539 EP - 554 PB - C.H. Beck CY - München ET - Fourth edition ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Zimmermann, Andreas A1 - Geiß, Robin ED - Ambos, Kai T1 - Article 8 Paras. 2(c)–(f) and 3: War crimes committed in an armed conflict not of an international character T2 - Rome statute of the International Criminal Court Y1 - 2022 SN - 978-3-406-74384-9 SN - 978-3-406-77926-8 SN - 978-1-5099-4405-7 SN - 978-3-8487-7648-1 SP - 837 EP - 1048 PB - C.H. Beck CY - München ET - 4 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Zimmermann, Andreas A1 - Geiß, Robin T1 - Article 8, VI, Article 8 para. 2 (f): scope of application of article 8 para. 2 (e) T2 - The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court Y1 - 2016 SN - 978-3-406-64854-0 PB - Beck CY - München ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Zimmermann, Andreas A1 - Freiburg-Braun, Elisa ED - Ambos, Kai T1 - Article 8bis Crime of aggression T2 - Rome statute of the International Criminal Court Y1 - 2022 SN - 978-3-406-77926-8 SN - 978-3-406-74384-9 SN - 978-1-5099-4405-7 SN - 978-3-8487-7648-1 U6 - https://doi.org/10.17104/9783406779268-686 SP - 686 EP - 726 PB - Beck CY - München ET - Fourth ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Zimmermann, Andreas T1 - Article 8bis: Crime of Aggression T2 - The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court Y1 - 2015 SP - 580 EP - 618 PB - Beck CY - München ET - 3. Aufl. ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Zimmermann, Andreas A1 - Freiburg, Elisa ED - Triffterer, Otto ED - Ambos, Kai T1 - Article 8bis: Crime of aggression T2 - The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court ; a commentary Y1 - 2016 SN - 978-3-406-64854-0 SP - 580 EP - 618 PB - Beck CY - München ET - 3. Aufl. ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Weiß, Norman A1 - Zimmermann, Andreas ED - Zimmermann, Andreas ED - Weiß, Norman T1 - Remarks on the relationship between international human rights law and international humanitarian law T2 - Human rights and international humanitarian law : challenges ahead N2 - Back in 1949, and thus only one year after the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the four Geneva Conventions were adopted, providing a strong signal for a new world order created after 1945 with the United Nations at their centre and combining as their goals both the maintenance of peace and security and the protection of human rights, but also recognising, realistically, that succeeding generations had so far not yet been saved from the scourge of war. Hence, the continued need for rules governing, and limiting, the means and methods of warfare once an armed conflict has erupted. At the same time, the international community has unfortunately not been able so far to fully safeguard individual human rights, its efforts to that effect and the continuous development of international human rights law over the years notwithstanding. Y1 - 2022 SN - 978-1-83910-826-6 SN - 978-1-83910-827-3 U6 - https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839108273.00006 SP - 1 EP - 10 PB - Edward Elgar Publishing CY - Cheltenham ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Zimmermann, Andreas A1 - Geiß, Robin T1 - The International Committee of the Red Cross: A Unique Actor in the Field of International Humanitarian Law Creation and Progressive Development BT - the Red Cross and the development of international humanitarian law T2 - Humanizing the Laws of War Y1 - 2017 SN - 978-1-107-17135-0 SN - 978-1-3167-5996-7 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316759967.009 SP - 215 EP - 255 PB - Cambridge University Press CY - Cambridge ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Zimmermann, Andreas ED - Jeßberger, Florian ED - Burghardt, Boris ED - Vormbaum, Moritz T1 - The International Criminal Court’s decision on jurisdiction concerning Palestine and the future of the ICC T2 - Strafrecht und Systemunrecht : Festschrift für Gerhard Werle zum 70. Geburtstag Y1 - 2022 SN - 978-3-16-161046-2 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-161046-2 SP - 451 EP - 460 PB - Mohr Siebeck CY - Tübingen ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Zimmermann, Andreas ED - Volpe, Valentina ED - Peters, Anne ED - Battini, Stefano T1 - Would the world be a better place if one were to adopt a European approach to state immunity? BT - Or, "Soll am Europäischen Wesen die Staatenimmunität genesen"? T2 - Remedies against immunity? N2 - This chapter argues not only that there is no European Sonderweg (or ‘special way’) when it comes to the law of state immunity but that there ought not to be one. Debates within The Hague Conference on Private International Law in the late 1990s and those leading to the adoption of the 2002 UN Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States, as well as the development of the EU Brussels Regulation on Jurisdiction and Enforcement, as amended in 2015, all demonstrate that state immunity was not meant to be limited by such treaties but ‘safeguarded’. Likewise, there is no proof that regional European customary law limits state immunity when it comes to ius cogens violations, as Italy and (partly) Greece are the only European states denying state immunity in such cases while the European Court of Human Rights has, time and again, upheld a broad concept of state immunity. It therefore seems unlikely that in the foreseeable future a specific European customary law norm on state immunity will develop, especially given the lack of participation in such practice by those states most concerned by the matter, including Germany. This chapter considers the possible legal implications of the jurisprudence of the Italian Constitutional Court for European military operations (if such operations went beyond peacekeeping). These implications would mainly depend on the question of attribution: if one where to assume that acts undertaken within the framework of military operations led by the EU were to be, at least also, attributable to the troop-contributing member states, the respective troop-contributing state would be entitled to enjoy state immunity exactly to the same degree as in any kind of unilateral military operations. Additionally, some possible perspectives beyond Sentenza 238/2014 are examined, in particular concerning the redress awarded by domestic courts ‘as long as’ neither the German nor the international system grant equivalent protection to the victims of serious violations of international humanitarian law committed during World War II. In the author’s opinion, strengthening the jurisdiction of international courts and tribunals, bringing interstate cases for damages before the International Court of Justice, as well as providing for claims commissions where individual compensation might be sought for violations of international humanitarian law would be more useful and appropriate mechanisms than denying state immunity. Y1 - 2021 SN - 978-3-662-62303-9 SN - 978-3-662-62304-6 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62304-6_12 VL - 297 SP - 219 EP - 233 PB - Springer CY - Berlin ; Heidelberg ER -