TY - JOUR A1 - Knapp, Michael A1 - Lalueza-Fox, Carles A1 - Hofreiter, Michael T1 - Re-inventing ancient human DNA JF - Investigative Genetics N2 - For a long time, the analysis of ancient human DNA represented one of the most controversial disciplines in an already controversial field of research. Scepticism in this field was only matched by the long-lasting controversy over the authenticity of ancient pathogen DNA. This ambiguous view on ancient human DNA had a dichotomous root. On the one hand, the interest in ancient human DNA is great because such studies touch on the history and evolution of our own species. On the other hand, because these studies are dealing with samples from our own species, results are easily compromised by contamination of the experiments with modern human DNA, which is ubiquitous in the environment. Consequently, some of the most disputed studies published - apart maybe from early reports on million year old dinosaur or amber DNA - reported DNA analyses from human subfossil remains. However, the development of so-called next-or second-generation sequencing (SGS) in 2005 and the technological advances associated with it have generated new confidence in the genetic study of ancient human remains. The ability to sequence shorter DNA fragments than with PCR amplification coupled to traditional Sanger sequencing, along with very high sequencing throughput have both reduced the risk of sequencing modern contamination and provided tools to evaluate the authenticity of DNA sequence data. The field is now rapidly developing, providing unprecedented insights into the evolution of our own species and past human population dynamics as well as the evolution and history of human pathogens and epidemics. Here, we review how recent technological improvements have rapidly transformed ancient human DNA research from a highly controversial subject to a central component of modern anthropological research. We also discuss potential future directions of ancient human DNA research. KW - Archaic humans KW - Human evolution KW - Human population genomics KW - Next/second-generation sequencing Y1 - 2015 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1186/s13323-015-0020-4 SN - 2041-2223 VL - 6 PB - BioMed Central CY - London ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Tassi, Francesca A1 - Vai, Stefania A1 - Ghirotto, Silvia A1 - Lari, Martina A1 - Modi, Alessandra A1 - Pilli, Elena A1 - Brunelli, Andrea A1 - Susca, Roberta Rosa A1 - Budnik, Alicja A1 - Labuda, Damian A1 - Alberti, Federica A1 - Lalueza-Fox, Carles A1 - Reich, David A1 - Caramelli, David A1 - Barbujani, Guido T1 - Genome diversity in the Neolithic Globular Amphorae culture and the spread of Indo-European languages JF - Proceedings of the Royal Society of London : B, Biological sciences N2 - It is unclear whether Indo-European languages in Europe spread from the Pontic steppes in the late Neolithic, or from Anatolia in the Early Neolithic. Under the former hypothesis, people of the Globular Amphorae culture (GAC) would be descended from Eastern ancestors, likely representing the Yamnaya culture. However, nuclear (six individuals typed for 597 573 SNPs) and mitochondrial (11 complete sequences) DNA from the GAC appear closer to those of earlier Neolithic groups than to the DNA of all other populations related to the Pontic steppe migration. Explicit comparisons of alternative demographic models via approximate Bayesian computation confirmed this pattern. These results are not in contrast to Late Neolithic gene flow from the Pontic steppes into Central Europe. However, they add nuance to this model, showing that the eastern affinities of the GAC in the archaeological record reflect cultural influences from other groups from the East, rather than the movement of people. KW - population genomics KW - ancient DNA KW - migration KW - Neolithic KW - Indo-European KW - approximate Bayesian computation Y1 - 2017 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1540 SN - 0962-8452 SN - 1471-2954 VL - 284 PB - Royal Society CY - London ER -