TY - JOUR A1 - Martinez-Valdes, Eduardo Andrés A1 - Farina, Dario A1 - Negro, Francesco A1 - Del Vecchio, Alessandro A1 - Falla, Deborah T1 - Early motor unit conduction velocity changes to high-intensity interval training versus continuous training JF - Medicine and science in sports and exercise : official journal of the American College of Sports Medicine N2 - Purpose Moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) are associated with different adjustments in motor output. Changes in motor unit (MU) peripheral properties may contribute to these adjustments, but this is yet to be elucidated. This study evaluated early changes in MU conduction velocity (MUCV) and MU action potential amplitude after 2 wk of either HIIT or MICT. Methods Sixteen men were assigned to either an MICT group or HIIT group (n = 8 each), and participated in six training sessions over 14 d. HIIT: 8 to 12 x 60-s intervals at 100% peak power output. Moderate-intensity continuous training: 90 to 120 min continuous cycling at similar to 65% VO2peak. Preintervention and postintervention, participants performed maximal voluntary contractions (MVC) and submaximal (10%, 30%, 50%, and 70% of MVC) isometric knee extensions while high-density EMG was recorded from the vastus medialis (VM) and vastus lateralis (VL) muscles. The high-density EMG was decomposed into individual MU by convolutive blind-source separation and tracked preintervention and postintervention. Results Both training interventions induced changes in MUCV, but these changes depended on the type of training (P < 0.001). The HIIT group showed higher values of MUCV after training at all torque levels (P < 0.05), MICT only displayed changes in MUCV at low torque levels (10%-30% MVC, P < 0.002). There were no changes in MU action potential amplitude for either group (P = 0.2). Conclusions Two weeks of HIIT or MICT elicit differential changes in MUCV, likely due to the contrasting load and volume used in such training regimes. This new knowledge on the neuromuscular adaptations to training has implications for exercise prescription. KW - Motor unit KW - Conduction velocity KW - Amplitude KW - Action potential KW - High-intensity interval training KW - Endurance training Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000001705 SN - 0195-9131 SN - 1530-0315 VL - 50 IS - 11 SP - 2339 EP - 2350 PB - Lippincott Williams & Wilkins CY - Philadelphia ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Martinez-Valdes, Eduardo Andrés A1 - Negro, Francesco A1 - Falla, Deborah A1 - De Nunzio, Alessandro Marco A1 - Farina, Dario T1 - Surface electromyographic amplitude does not identify differences in neural drive to synergistic muscles JF - Journal of applied physiology N2 - Surface electromyographic (EMG) signal amplitude is typically used to compare the neural drive to muscles. We experimentally investigated this association by studying the motor unit (MU) behavior and action potentials in the vastus medialis (VM) and vastus lateralis (VL) muscles. Eighteen participants performed isometric knee extensions at four target torques [10. 30. 50, and 70% of the maximum torque (MVC)] while high-density EMG signals were recorded from the VM and VL. The absolute EMG amplitude was greater for VM than VL (P < 0.001), whereas the EMG amplitude normalized with respect to MVC was greater for VL than VM (P < 0.04). Because differences in EMG amplitude can be due to both differences in the neural drive and in the size of the MU action potentials, we indirectly inferred the neural drives received by the two muscles by estimating the synaptic inputs received by the corresponding motor neuron pools. For this purpose. we analyzed the increase in discharge rate from recruitment to target torque for motor units matched by recruitment threshold in the two muscles. This analysis indicated that the two muscles received similar levels of neural drive. Nonetheless, the size of the MU action potentials was greater for VM than VL (P < 0.001), and this difference explained most of the differences in EMG amplitude between the two muscles (similar to 63% of explained variance). These results indicate that EMG amplitude, even following normalization, does not reflect the neural drive to synergistic muscles. Moreover, absolute EMG amplitude is mainly explained by the size of MU action potentials. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Electromyographic (EMG) amplitude is widely used to compare indirectly the strength of neural drive received by synergistic muscles. However, there are no studies validating this approach with motor unit data. Here, we compared between-muscles differences in surface EMG amplitude and motor unit behavior. The results clarify the limitations of surface EMG to interpret differences in neural drive between muscles. KW - amplitude KW - high-density surface EMG: synergistic muscles KW - motor unit KW - motor unit action potential KW - surface electromyography Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01115.2017 SN - 8750-7587 SN - 1522-1601 VL - 124 IS - 4 SP - 1071 EP - 1079 PB - American Chemical Society CY - Bethesda ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Mueller, Juliane A1 - Martinez-Valdes, Eduardo Andrés A1 - Stoll, Josefine A1 - Mueller, Steffen A1 - Engel, Tilman A1 - Mayer, Frank T1 - Differences in neuromuscular activity of ankle stabilizing muscles during postural disturbances BT - a gender-specific analysis JF - Gait & posture N2 - The purpose was to examine gender differences in ankle stabilizing muscle activation during postural disturbances. Seventeen participants (9 females: 27 +/- 2yrs., 1.69 +/- 0.1 m, 63 +/- 7 kg; 8 males: 29 +/- 2yrs., 1.81 +/- 0.1 m; 83 +/- 7 kg) were included in the study. After familiarization on a split-belt-treadmill, participants walked (1 m/s) while 15 right-sided perturbations were randomly applied 200 ms after initial heel contact. Muscle activity of M. tibialis anterior (TA), peroneus longus (PL) and gastrocnemius medialis (GM) was recorded during unperturbed and perturbed walking. The root mean square (RMS; [%]) was analyzed within 200 ms after perturbation. Co-activation was quantified as ratio of antagonist (GM)/agonist (TA) EMG-RMS during unperturbed and perturbed walking. Time to onset was calculated (ms). Data were analyzed descriptively (mean +/- SD) followed by three-way-ANOVA (gender/condition/muscle; alpha= 0.05). Perturbed walking elicited higher EMG activity compared to normal walking for TA and PL in both genders (p < 0.000). RMS amplitude gender comparisons revealed an interaction between gender and condition (F = 4.6, p = 0.049) and, a triple interaction among gender, condition and muscle (F = 4.7, p = 0.02). Women presented significantly higher EMG-RMS [%] PL amplitude than men during perturbed walking (mean difference = 209.6%, 95% confidence interval = -367.0 to -52.2%, p < 0.000). Co-activation showed significant lower values for perturbed compared to normal walking (p < 0.000), without significant gender differences for both walking conditions. GM activated significantly earlier than TA and PL (p < 0.01) without significant differences between the muscle activation onsets of men and women (p = 0.7). The results reflect that activation strategies of the ankle encompassing muscles differ between genders. In provoked stumbling, higher PL EMG activity in women compared to men is present. Future studies should aim to elucidate if this specific behavior has any relationship with ankle injury occurrence between genders. KW - Lower extremity KW - EMG KW - Perturbation KW - Split-belt treadmill KW - Ankle Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.01.023 SN - 0966-6362 SN - 1879-2219 VL - 61 SP - 226 EP - 231 PB - Elsevier CY - Clare ER -