TY  - GEN
A1  - Ćwiek-Kupczyńska, Hanna
A1  - Altmann, Thomas
A1  - Arend, Daniel
A1  - Arnaud, Elizabeth
A1  - Chen, Dijun
A1  - Cornut, Guillaume
A1  - Fiorani, Fabio
A1  - Frohmberg, Wojciech
A1  - Junker, Astrid
A1  - Klukas, Christian
A1  - Lange, Matthias
A1  - Mazurek, Cezary
A1  - Nafissi, Anahita
A1  - Neveu, Pascal
A1  - van Oeveren, Jan
A1  - Pommier, Cyril
A1  - Poorter, Hendrik
A1  - Rocca-Serra, Philippe
A1  - Sansone, Susanna-Assunta
A1  - Scholz, Uwe
A1  - van Schriek, Marco
A1  - Seren, Ümit
A1  - Usadel, Björn
A1  - Weise, Stephan
A1  - Kersey, Paul
A1  - Krajewski, Paweł
T1  - Measures for interoperability of phenotypic data
BT  - minimum information requirements and formatting
T2  - Plant methods
N2  - Background:
  Plant phenotypic data shrouds a wealth of information which, when accurately analysed and linked 
to other data types, brings to light the knowledge about the mechanisms of life. As phenotyping is a field of research 
comprising manifold, diverse and time
‑consuming experiments, the findings can be fostered by reusing and combin‑
ing existing datasets. Their correct interpretation, and thus replicability, comparability and interoperability, is possible 
provided that the collected observations are equipped with an adequate set of metadata. So far there have been no 
common standards governing phenotypic data description, which hampered data exchange and reuse.
Results:
  In this paper we propose the guidelines for proper handling of the information about plant phenotyping 
experiments, in terms of both the recommended content of the description and its formatting. We provide a docu‑
ment called “Minimum Information About a Plant Phenotyping Experiment”, which specifies what information about 
each experiment should be given, and a Phenotyping Configuration for the ISA
‑Tab format, which allows to practically 
organise this information within a dataset. We provide examples of ISA
‑Tab
‑formatted phenotypic data, and a general 
description of a few systems where the recommendations have been implemented.
Conclusions:
  Acceptance of the rules described in this paper by the plant phenotyping community will help to 
achieve findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable data.
T3  - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe - 450 
KW  - data standardisation and formatting
KW  - experimental metadata
KW  - minimum information recommendations
KW  - plant phenotyping
KW  - experiment description
Y1  - 2018
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-407299
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - ´Cwiek-Kupczynska, Hanna
A1  - Altmann, Thomas
A1  - Arend, Daniel
A1  - Arnaud, Elizabeth
A1  - Chen, Dijun
A1  - Cornut, Guillaume
A1  - Fiorani, Fabio
A1  - Frohmberg, Wojciech
A1  - Junker, Astrid
A1  - Klukas, Christian
A1  - Lange, Matthias
A1  - Mazurek, Cezary
A1  - Nafissi, Anahita
A1  - Neveu, Pascal
A1  - van Oeveren, Jan
A1  - Pommier, Cyril
A1  - Poorter, Hendrik
A1  - Rocca-Serra, Philippe
A1  - Sansone, Susanna-Assunta
A1  - Scholz, Uwe
A1  - van Schriek, Marco
A1  - Seren, Ümit
A1  - Usadel, Bjorn
A1  - Weise, Stephan
A1  - Kersey, Paul
A1  - Krajewski, Pawel
T1  - Measures for interoperability of phenotypic data: minimum information requirements and formatting
JF  - Plant Methods
N2  - Background: Plant phenotypic data shrouds a wealth of information which, when accurately analysed and linked to other data types, brings to light the knowledge about the mechanisms of life. As phenotyping is a field of research comprising manifold, diverse and time-consuming experiments, the findings can be fostered by reusing and combining existing datasets. Their correct interpretation, and thus replicability, comparability and interoperability, is possible provided that the collected observations are equipped with an adequate set of metadata. So far there have been no common standards governing phenotypic data description, which hampered data exchange and reuse. Results: In this paper we propose the guidelines for proper handling of the information about plant phenotyping experiments, in terms of both the recommended content of the description and its formatting. We provide a document called "Minimum Information About a Plant Phenotyping Experiment", which specifies what information about each experiment should be given, and a Phenotyping Configuration for the ISA-Tab format, which allows to practically organise this information within a dataset. We provide examples of ISA-Tab-formatted phenotypic data, and a general description of a few systems where the recommendations have been implemented. Conclusions: Acceptance of the rules described in this paper by the plant phenotyping community will help to achieve findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable data.
KW  - Data standardisation and formatting
KW  - Experimental metadata
KW  - Minimum information recommendations
KW  - Plant phenotyping
KW  - Experiment description
Y1  - 2016
U6  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-016-0144-4
SN  - 1746-4811
VL  - 12
PB  - BioMed Central
CY  - London
ER  -