TY - JOUR A1 - Garofalo, F. A1 - Foti, S. A1 - Hollender, F. A1 - Bard, Pierre-Yves A1 - Cornou, C. A1 - Cox, B. R. A1 - Ohrnberger, Matthias A1 - Sicilia, D. A1 - Asten, M. A1 - Di Giulio, G. A1 - Forbriger, T. A1 - Guillier, B. A1 - Hayashi, K. A1 - Martin, A. A1 - Matsushima, Satoru A1 - Mercerat, D. A1 - Poggi, V. A1 - Yamanaka, H. T1 - InterPACIFIC project: Comparison of invasive and non-invasive methods for seismic site characterization. Part I: Intra-comparison of surface wave methods JF - Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering N2 - The main scope of the InterPACIFIC (Intercomparison of methods for site parameter and velocity profile characterization) project is to assess the reliability of in-hole and surface-wave methods, used for estimating shear wave velocity. Three test-sites with different subsurface conditions were chosen: a soft soil, a stiff soil and a rock outcrop. This paper reports the surface-wave methods results. Specifically 14 teams of expert users analysed the same experimental surface-wave datasets, consisting of both passive and active data. Each team adopted their own strategy to retrieve the dispersion curve and the shear-wave velocity profile at each site. Despite different approaches, the dispersion curves are quite in agreement with each other. Conversely, the shear-wave velocity profiles show a certain variability that increases in correspondence of major stratigraphic interfaces. This larger variability is mainly due to non-uniqueness of the solution and lateral variability. As expected, the observed variability in V-s,V-30 estimatesis small, as solution non-uniqueness plays a limited role. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. KW - Surface-wave methods KW - Dispersion curve KW - Inversion KW - V-s,V-30 KW - Site characterization KW - MASW KW - Microtremors KW - Rayleigh waves KW - Geophysical methods Y1 - 2016 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.12.010 SN - 0267-7261 SN - 1879-341X VL - 82 SP - 222 EP - 240 PB - Elsevier CY - Oxford ER -