TY - JOUR A1 - Bastiaanse, Roelien A1 - Wieling, Martijn A1 - Wolthuis, Nienke T1 - The role of frequency in the retrieval of nouns and verbs in aphasia JF - Aphasiology : an international, interdisciplinary journal N2 - Background: Word retrieval in aphasia involves different levels of processinglemma retrieval, grammatical encoding, lexeme retrieval, and phonological encodingbefore articulation can be programmed and executed. Several grammatical, semantic, lexical, and phonological characteristics, such as word class, age of acquisition, imageability, and word frequency influence the degree of success in word retrieval. It is, however, not yet clear how these factors interact. The current study focuses on the retrieval of nouns and verbs in isolation and in sentence context and evaluates the impact of the mentioned factors on the performance of a group of 54 aphasic speakers.Aims: The main aim is to measure the effect of word frequency on the retrieval of nouns and verb by disentangling the influence of word class, age of acquisition, imageability, and lemma and lexeme frequencies on word retrieval in aphasia.Methods & Procedures: Four tests for retrieval of nouns, verbs in isolation, and infinitives and finite verbs were administered to 54 aphasic speakers. The influence of lemma and lexeme frequency, Age of Acquisition on the word retrieval abilities was analysed.Outcomes and Results: Word class, age of acquisition, and imageability play a significant role in the retrieval of nouns and verbs: nouns are easier than verbs; the earlier a word has been learned and the more concrete it is, the easier it is to retrieve. When performance is controlled for these factors, lemma frequency turns out to play a minor role: only in object naming does it affect word retrieval: the higher the lemma frequency of a noun, the easier it is to access. Such an effect does not exist for verbs, neither on an action-naming test, nor when verbs have to be retrieved in sentence context. Lexeme frequency was not found to be a better predictor than lemma frequency in predicting word retrieval in aphasia.Conclusions: Word retrieval in aphasia is influenced by grammatical, semantic, and lexical factors. Word frequency only plays a minor role: it affects the retrieval of nouns, but not of verbs. KW - Word frequency KW - age of acquisition KW - imageability KW - verbs KW - nouns KW - aphasia Y1 - 2016 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2015.1100709 SN - 0268-7038 SN - 1464-5041 VL - 30 SP - 1221 EP - 1239 PB - Karger CY - Abingdon ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Linnik, Anastasia A1 - Bastiaanse, Roelien A1 - Höhle, Barbara T1 - Discourse production in aphasia: a current review of theoretical and methodological challenges JF - Aphasiology : an international, interdisciplinary journal N2 - Background: Discourse abilities play an important role in the assessment, classification, and therapy outcome evaluation of people with aphasia. Discourse production in aphasia has been studied quite extensively in the last 15 years. Nevertheless, many questions still do not have definitive answers.Aims: The aim of this review is to present the current situation in the research on a number of crucial aspects of discourse production in aphasia, focusing on methodological progress and related challenges. This review continues the discussion of the core themes in the field, aiming to render it as up-to-date as possible.Main Contribution: The review focuses on a number of unexplored theoretical issues, specifically, the interface between micro- and macrolinguistic abilities, and the relationship between linguistic competence and communicative success in aphasia. The emphasis on theoretical challenges, along with the thorough discussion of methodological problems in the field, makes this review a starting point and a comprehensive information source for researchers planning to address language production in people with aphasia.Conclusion: Although the picture is not yet complete, recent advancements lead to a better understanding of the processes involved in aphasic discourse production. Different approaches provide insights into the complex multifaceted nature of discourse-level phenomena; however, methodological issues, including low comparability, substantially slow down the progress in the field. KW - Discourse production KW - aphasia Y1 - 2016 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2015.1113489 SN - 0268-7038 SN - 1464-5041 VL - 30 SP - 765 EP - 800 PB - Copernicus CY - Abingdon ER - TY - THES A1 - Linnik, Anastasia T1 - Coherence and structure in aphasic and non-aphasic spoken discourse T1 - Kohärenz und Struktur im aphasischen und nicht-aphasischen gesprochenen Diskurs N2 - Discourse production is crucial for communicative success and is in the core of aphasia assessment and treatment. Coherence differentiates discourse from a series of utterances/sentences; it is internal unity and connectedness, and, as such, perhaps the most inherent property of discourse. It is unclear whether people with aphasia, who experience various language production difficulties, preserve the ability to produce coherent discourse. A more general question of how coherence is established and represented linguistically has been addressed in the literature, yet remains unanswered. This dissertation presents an investigation of discourse production in aphasia and the linguistic mechanisms of establishing coherence. N2 - Die Diskursproduktion ist entscheidend für den kommunikativen Erfolg und ist ausschlaggebend für die Diagnostik und Behandlung von Aphasie. Durch Kohärenz wird eine Reihe von Äußerungen oder Sätzen zum Diskurs. Kohärenz stellt die innere Einheit und Verbundenheit eines Textes dar und ist damit vielleicht die zentrale Eigenschaft des Diskurses. Es ist unklar, ob Menschen mit Aphasie, die Schwierigkeiten bei der Sprachproduktion haben, die Fähigkeit bewahren, einen kohärenten Diskurs zu konstruieren. Die Frage, was genau Sprache kohärent macht, wurde in der Literatur behandelt, ist aber nicht vollständig verstanden. Diese Dissertation stellt eine Untersuchung der aphasischen Diskursproduktion und der linguistischen Mechanismen zur Herstellung von Kohärenz dar. KW - aphasia KW - discourse production KW - rhetorical structure theory KW - coherence KW - Aphasie KW - Diskursproduktion KW - rhetorische Struktur KW - Kohärenz Y1 - 2016 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-423202 ER - TY - THES A1 - Räling, Romy T1 - Age of acquisition and semantic typicality effects T1 - Erwerbsalter- und semantische Typikalitätseffekte BT - evidences for distinct processing origins from behavioural and ERP data in healthy and impaired semantic processing BT - Evidenzen für distinktive Verarbeitungsursprünge aus behavioralen und elektrophysiologischen Daten der sprachgesunden und beeinträchtigten semantischen Verarbeitung N2 - Age of acquisition (AOA) is a psycholinguistic variable that significantly influences behavioural measures (response times and accuracy rates) in tasks that require lexical and semantic processing. Its origin is – unlike the origin of semantic typicality (TYP), which is assumed at the semantic level – controversially discussed. Different theories propose AOA effects to originate either at the semantic level or at the link between semantics and phonology (lemma-level). The dissertation aims at investigating the influence of AOA and its interdependence with the semantic variable TYP on particularly semantic processing in order to pinpoint the origin of AOA effects. Therefore, three studies have been conducted that considered the variables AOA and TYP in semantic processing tasks (category verifications and animacy decisions) by means of behavioural and partly electrophysiological (ERP) data and in different populations (healthy young and elderly participants and in semantically impaired individuals with aphasia (IWA)). The behavioural and electrophysiological data of the three studies provide evidence for distinct processing levels of the variables AOA and TYP. The data further support previous assumptions on a semantic origin for TYP but question the same for AOA. The findings, however, support an origin of AOA effects at the transition between the word form (phonology) and the semantic level that can be captured at the behavioural but not at the electrophysiological level. N2 - Das Erwerbsalter (engl. age of acquisition, AOA) ist eine psycholinguistische Variable, die Verhaltensdaten (Reaktionszeiten und Fehlerraten) von sprachgesunden Studienteilnehmern in Aufgaben zur lexikalisch-semantischen Verarbeitung nachweislich beeinflusst. Während für die Typikalität (engl. typicality, TYP), eine weitere wichtige psycholinguistische Variable, der Verarbeitungsursprung auf der semantischen Ebene als sicher angenommen werden kann, wird der Ursprung des Erwerbsalters bis heute kontrovers diskutiert. Verschiedene Theorien erwägen den Ursprung von Erwerbsaltereffekten entweder auf der semantischen Ebene oder auf der Verbindungsroute zwischen der Semantik und der Phonologie (Lemma-Level). Das Ziel der Dissertation ist die Evaluation eines semantischen Ursprunges von Erwerbsaltereffekten sowie des Wechselspiels des Erwerbsalters mit der semantischen Variable Typikalität. Im Rahmen des Promotionsprojektes wurden drei Studien durchgeführt, die die Variablen Erwerbsalter und Typikalität in Aufgaben zum Sprachverständnis (Belebtheits-Entscheiden und Kategorie-Vertreter-Verifikation) mit Hilfe unterschiedlicher Methoden (Verhaltens- und EEG-Messungen) und Populationen (junge und ältere Sprachgesunde und Aphasiker mit einem spezifisch semantischen Defizit) untersuchen. Die erhobenen Daten der drei Studien liefern Evidenzen für unterschiedliche Verarbeitungsursprünge der Variablen Erwerbsalter und Typikalität. Während die Daten bisherige Annahmen eines semantischen Ursprunges von Typikalitätseffekten unterstützen, stellen sie entsprechendes für Erwerbsaltereffekte in Frage. Insbesondere die behavioralen Ergebnisse liefern jedoch Evidenzen für einen Verarbeitungsursprung des Erwerbsalters auf den Verbindungsrouten zwischen den Wortformebenen (phonologisches bzw. graphematisches Inputlexikon) und der semantischen Ebene. KW - semantische Typikalität KW - Erwerbsalter KW - Aphasie KW - semantische Verarbeitung KW - ereigniskorrelierte Potentiale KW - semantic typicality KW - age of acquisition KW - aphasia KW - semantic processing KW - event-related potentials Y1 - 2016 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-95943 ER -