TY - JOUR A1 - Hasenbring, Monika Ilona A1 - Levenig, Claudia A1 - Hallner, D. A1 - Puschmann, Anne-Katrin A1 - Weiffen, A. A1 - Kleinert, Jens A1 - Belz, J. A1 - Schiltenwolf, Marcus A1 - Pfeifer, A. -C. A1 - Heidari, Jahan . A1 - Kellmann, M. A1 - Wippert, Pia-Maria T1 - Psychosoziale Risikofaktoren für chronischen Rückenschmerz in der Allgemeingesellschaft und im Leistungssport T1 - Psychosocial Risk Factors for chronic Back Pain in the General Population and in Competitive Sports BT - Von der Modellbildung zum klinischen Screening – ein Review aus dem MiSpEx-Netzwerk BT - From theory to clinical screening—a review from the MiSpEx network A Review from the MiSpEx Network JF - Manuelle Medizin N2 - Hintergrund Lumbale Ruckenschmerzen und ihre Neigung zur Chronifizierung stellen nicht nur in der Allgemeinbevolkerung, sondern auch im Leistungssport ein bedeutendes Gesundheitsproblem dar. Im Gegensatz zu Nichtathleten ist die Erforschung psychosozialer Risikofaktoren sowie von Screeningfragebogen, die moglichst fruhzeitig die Entwicklung chronischer Schmerzen erkennen und vorhersagen konnen, im Leistungssport noch in den Anfangen. Das vorliegende systematische Review gibt einen uberblick uber den Stand der Risikofaktorenforschung in beiden Feldern und untersucht die pradiktive Qualitat verschiedener Screeningfragebogen bei Nichtathleten. Methodik Die Literatursuche erfolgte zwischen Marz und Juni 2016 in den Datenbanken MEDLINE, PubMed und PsycINFO mit den Suchbegriffen psychosocial screening, low back pain, sciatica und prognosis, athletes. Eingeschlossen wurden prospektive Studien an Patienten mit lumbalen Ruckenschmerzen mit und ohne Ausstrahlung in das Bein, 18Jahre und mit einem Follow-up von mindestens 3-monatiger Dauer. Ergebnisse In das Review zu Screeninginstrumenten wurden 16Studien einbezogen. Alle waren an klinischen Stichproben der Allgemeingesellschaft durchgefuhrt worden. Zu den am haufigsten publizierten Screeningfragebogen gehoren der orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire (oMPSQ) mit einer zufriedenstellenden Fruherkennung der Wiederherstellung der Arbeitsfahigkeit sowie das STarT Back Screening Tool (SBT) mit guter Vorhersage schmerzbedingter Beeintrachtigung. Fur die Vorhersage kunftiger Schmerzen eignen sich die Risikoanalyse der Schmerzchronifizierung (RISC-R) und der Heidelberger Kurzfragebogen (HKF). Schlussfolgerungen Psychosoziale Risikofaktoren fur chronische Ruckenschmerzen, wie z.B. chronischer Stress, ungunstige Schmerzverarbeitung und depressive Stimmungslagen, werden zunehmend auch im Leistungssport erkannt. Screeninginstrumente, die sich in der Allgemeingesellschaft als hinreichend vorhersagestark erwiesen haben, werden aktuell im MiSpEx-Forschungsverbund auf ihre Eignung uberpruft. N2 - Background Lumbar back pain and the high risk of chronic complaints is not only an important health concern in the general population but also in high performance athletes. In contrast to non-athletes, there is a lack of research into psychosocial risk factors in athletes. Moreover, the development of psychosocial screening questionnaires that would be qualified to detect athletes with a high risk of chronicity is in the early stages. The purpose of this review is to give an overview of research into psychosocial risk factors in both populations and to evaluate the performance of screening instruments in non-athletes. Methods The databases MEDLINE, PubMed, and PsycINFO were searched from March to June 2016 using the keywords “psychosocial screening”, “low back pain”, “sciatica” and “prognosis”, “athletes”. We included prospective studies conducted in patients with low back pain with and without radiation to the legs, aged ≥18 years and a follow-up of at least 3 months. Results We identified 16 eligible studies, all of them conducted in samples of non-athletes. Among the most frequently published screening questionnaires, the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire (ÖMPSQ) demonstrated a sufficient early prediction of return to work and the STarT Back Screening Tool (SBT) revealed acceptable performance predicting pain-related impairment. The prediction of future pain was sufficient with the Risk Analysis of Back Pain Chronification (RISC-BP) and the Heidelberg Short Questionnaire (HKF). Conclusion Psychosocial risk factors of chronic back pain, such as chronic stress, depressive mood, and maladaptive pain processing are becoming increasingly more recognized in competitive sports. Screening instruments that have been shown to be predictive in the general population are currently being tested for suitability in the German MiSpEx research consortium. KW - Chronischer Rückenschmerz KW - Psychosoziale Risikofaktoren KW - Screening KW - Prognose KW - Chronic back pain KW - Psychosocial risk factors KW - Screening KW - Prognosis Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00337-018-0450-1 SN - 0025-2514 SN - 1433-0466 VL - 56 IS - 5 SP - 359 EP - 373 PB - Springer CY - Heidelberg ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Hasenbring, Monika Ilona A1 - Levenig, Claudia A1 - Hallner, D. A1 - Puschmann, Anne-Katrin A1 - Weiffen, A. A1 - Kleinert, Jens A1 - Belz, J. A1 - Schiltenwolf, Marcus A1 - Pfeifer, A. -C. A1 - Heidari, Jahan A1 - Kellmann, M. A1 - Wippert, Pia-Maria T1 - Psychosocial risk factors for chronic back pain in the general population and in competitive sports BT - from theory to clinical screening- a review fromthe MiSpEx network BT - Von der Modellbildung zum klinischen Screening – ein Review aus dem MiSpEx-Netzwerk JF - Der Schmerz : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft zum Studium des Schmerzes, der Österreichischen Schmerzgesellschaft und der Deutschen Interdisziplinären Vereinigung für Schmerztherapie N2 - Lumbar back pain and the high risk of chronic complaints is not only an important health concern in the general population but also in high performance athletes. In contrast to non-athletes, there is a lack of research into psychosocial risk factors in athletes. Moreover, the development of psychosocial screening questionnaires that would be qualified to detect athletes with a high risk of chronicity is in the early stages. The purpose of this review is to give an overview of research into psychosocial risk factors in both populations and to evaluate the performance of screening instruments in non-athletes. The databases MEDLINE, PubMed, and PsycINFO were searched from March to June 2016 using the keywords "psychosocial screening", "low back pain", "sciatica" and "prognosis", "athletes". We included prospective studies conducted in patients with low back pain with and without radiation to the legs, aged ae18 years and a follow-up of at least 3 months. We identified 16 eligible studies, all of them conducted in samples of non-athletes. Among the most frequently published screening questionnaires, the A-rebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire (A-MPSQ) demonstrated a sufficient early prediction of return to work and the STarT Back Screening Tool (SBT) revealed acceptable performance predicting pain-related impairment. The prediction of future pain was sufficient with the Risk Analysis of Back Pain Chronification (RISC-BP) and the Heidelberg Short Questionnaire (HKF). Psychosocial risk factors of chronic back pain, such as chronic stress, depressive mood, and maladaptive pain processing are becoming increasingly more recognized in competitive sports. Screening instruments that have been shown to be predictive in the general population are currently being tested for suitability in the German MiSpEx research consortium. T2 - Psychosoziale Risikofaktoren für chronischen Rückenschmerz in der Allgemeingesellschaft und im Leistungssport KW - Chronic back pain KW - Psychosocial risk factors KW - Screening KW - Prognosis Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00482-018-0307-5 SN - 0932-433X SN - 1432-2129 VL - 32 IS - 4 SP - 259 EP - 273 PB - Springer CY - Heidelberg ER - TY - GEN A1 - Hasenbring, Monika Ilona A1 - Levenig, Claudia A1 - Hallner, D. A1 - Puschmann, Anne-Katrin A1 - Weiffen, A. A1 - Kleinert, Jens A1 - Belz, Johanna A1 - Schiltenwolf, Marcus A1 - Pfeifer, Ann-Christin A1 - Heidari, Jahan A1 - Kellmann, Michael A1 - Wippert, Pia-Maria T1 - Screeninginstrumente BT - mehr Licht als Schatten T2 - Der Schmerz : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft zum Studium des Schmerzes, der Österreichischen Schmerzgesellschaft und der Deutschen Interdisziplinären Vereinigung für Schmerztherapie Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00482-018-0340-4 SN - 0932-433X SN - 1432-2129 VL - 32 IS - 6 SP - 479 EP - 481 PB - Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH CY - Heidelberg ER - TY - GEN A1 - Niederer, Daniel A1 - Vogt, Lutz A1 - Wippert, Pia-Maria A1 - Puschmann, Anne-Katrin A1 - Pfeifer, Ann-Christin A1 - Schiltenwolf, Marcus A1 - Banzer, Winfried A1 - Mayer, Frank T1 - Medicine in spine exercise (MiSpEx) for nonspecific low back pain patients BT - study protocol for a multicentre, single-blind randomized controlled trial T2 - Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe N2 - Background: Arising from the relevance of sensorimotor training in the therapy of nonspecific low back pain patients and from the value of individualized therapy, the present trial aims to test the feasibility and efficacy of individualized sensorimotor training interventions in patients suffering from nonspecific low back pain. Methods and study design: A multicentre, single-blind two-armed randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effects of a 12-week (3 weeks supervised centre-based and 9 weeks home-based) individualized sensorimotor exercise program is performed. The control group stays inactive during this period. Outcomes are pain, and pain-associated function as well as motor function in adults with nonspecific low back pain. Each participant is scheduled to five measurement dates: baseline (M1), following centre-based training (M2), following home-based training (M3) and at two follow-up time points 6 months (M4) and 12 months (M5) after M1. All investigations and the assessment of the primary and secondary outcomes are performed in a standardized order: questionnaires – clinical examination – biomechanics (motor function). Subsequent statistical procedures are executed after the examination of underlying assumptions for parametric or rather non-parametric testing. Discussion: The results and practical relevance of the study will be of clinical and practical relevance not only for researchers and policy makers but also for the general population suffering from nonspecific low back pain. Trial registration: Identification number DRKS00010129. German Clinical Trial registered on 3 March 2016. T3 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe - 444 KW - sensorimotor training KW - motor control KW - exercise KW - low back painExercise KW - functional capacity KW - individualized intervention Y1 - 2018 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-407308 IS - 444 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Niederer, Daniel A1 - Vogt, Lutz A1 - Wippert, Pia-Maria A1 - Puschmann, Anne-Katrin A1 - Pfeifer, Ann-Christin A1 - Schiltenwolf, Marcus A1 - Banzer, Winfried A1 - Mayer, Frank T1 - Medicine in spine exercise (MiSpEx) for nonspecific low back pain patients: study protocol for a multicentre, single-blind randomized controlled trial JF - Trials N2 - Background: Arising from the relevance of sensorimotor training in the therapy of nonspecific low back pain patients and from the value of individualized therapy, the present trial aims to test the feasibility and efficacy of individualized sensorimotor training interventions in patients suffering from nonspecific low back pain. Methods and study design: A multicentre, single-blind two-armed randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effects of a 12-week (3 weeks supervised centre-based and 9 weeks home-based) individualized sensorimotor exercise program is performed. The control group stays inactive during this period. Outcomes are pain, and pain-associated function as well as motor function in adults with nonspecific low back pain. Each participant is scheduled to five measurement dates: baseline (M1), following centre-based training (M2), following home-based training (M3) and at two follow-up time points 6 months (M4) and 12 months (M5) after M1. All investigations and the assessment of the primary and secondary outcomes are performed in a standardized order: questionnaires - clinical examination biomechanics (motor function). Subsequent statistical procedures are executed after the examination of underlying assumptions for parametric or rather non-parametric testing. Discussion: The results and practical relevance of the study will be of clinical and practical relevance not only for researchers and policy makers but also for the general population suffering from nonspecific low back pain. KW - Sensorimotor training KW - Motor control KW - Low back pain KW - Exercise KW - Functional capacity KW - Individualized intervention Y1 - 2016 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1645-1 SN - 1745-6215 VL - 17 PB - BioMed Central CY - London ER - TY - GEN A1 - Puschmann, Anne-Kathrin A1 - Beck, Heidrun A1 - Schiltenwolf, Marcus A1 - Wippert, Pia-Maria A1 - Mayer, Frank T1 - Distress in a longitudinal study of a population with nonspecific low back pain T2 - Psychosomatic medicine Y1 - 2017 SN - 0033-3174 SN - 1534-7796 VL - 79 SP - A20 EP - A21 PB - Lippincott Williams & Wilkins CY - Philadelphia ER - TY - GEN A1 - Puschmann, Anne-Katrin A1 - Drießlein, David A1 - Beck, Heidrun A1 - Arampatzis, Adamantios A1 - Moreno Catalá, Maria A1 - Schiltenwolf, Marcus A1 - Mayer, Frank A1 - Wippert, Pia-Maria T1 - Stress and Self-Efficacy as Long-Term Predictors for Chronic Low Back Pain BT - A Prospective Longitudinal Study T2 - Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe N2 - Purpose: Psychosocial variables are known risk factors for the development and chronification of low back pain (LBP). Psychosocial stress is one of these risk factors. Therefore, this study aims to identify the most important types of stress predicting LBP. Self-efficacy was included as a potential protective factor related to both, stress and pain. Participants and Methods: This prospective observational study assessed n = 1071 subjects with low back pain over 2 years. Psychosocial stress was evaluated in a broad manner using instruments assessing perceived stress, stress experiences in work and social contexts, vital exhaustion and life-event stress. Further, self-efficacy and pain (characteristic pain intensity and disability) were assessed. Using least absolute shrinkage selection operator regression, important predictors of characteristic pain intensity and pain-related disability at 1-year and 2-years follow-up were analyzed. Results: The final sample for the statistic procedure consisted of 588 subjects (age: 39.2 (± 13.4) years; baseline pain intensity: 27.8 (± 18.4); disability: 14.3 (± 17.9)). In the 1-year follow-up, the stress types “tendency to worry”, “social isolation”, “work discontent” as well as vital exhaustion and negative life events were identified as risk factors for both pain intensity and pain-related disability. Within the 2-years follow-up, Lasso models identified the stress types “tendency to worry”, “social isolation”, “social conflicts”, and “perceived long-term stress” as potential risk factors for both pain intensity and disability. Furthermore, “self-efficacy” (“internality”, “self-concept”) and “social externality” play a role in reducing pain-related disability. Conclusion: Stress experiences in social and work-related contexts were identified as important risk factors for LBP 1 or 2 years in the future, even in subjects with low initial pain levels. Self-efficacy turned out to be a protective factor for pain development, especially in the long-term follow-up. Results suggest a differentiation of stress types in addressing psychosocial factors in research, prevention and therapy approaches. T3 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe - 617 KW - low back pain KW - psychosocial risk factors KW - stress KW - self-efficacy KW - MiSpEx Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-460134 SN - 1866-8364 SP - 613 EP - 621 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Puschmann, Anne-Katrin A1 - Drießlein, David A1 - Beck, Heidrun A1 - Arampatzis, Adamantios A1 - Moreno Catalá, Maria A1 - Schiltenwolf, Marcus A1 - Mayer, Frank A1 - Wippert, Pia-Maria T1 - Stress and Self-Efficacy as Long-Term Predictors for Chronic Low Back Pain BT - A Prospective Longitudinal Study JF - Journal of Pain Research N2 - Purpose: Psychosocial variables are known risk factors for the development and chronification of low back pain (LBP). Psychosocial stress is one of these risk factors. Therefore, this study aims to identify the most important types of stress predicting LBP. Self-efficacy was included as a potential protective factor related to both, stress and pain. Participants and Methods: This prospective observational study assessed n = 1071 subjects with low back pain over 2 years. Psychosocial stress was evaluated in a broad manner using instruments assessing perceived stress, stress experiences in work and social contexts, vital exhaustion and life-event stress. Further, self-efficacy and pain (characteristic pain intensity and disability) were assessed. Using least absolute shrinkage selection operator regression, important predictors of characteristic pain intensity and pain-related disability at 1-year and 2-years follow-up were analyzed. Results: The final sample for the statistic procedure consisted of 588 subjects (age: 39.2 (± 13.4) years; baseline pain intensity: 27.8 (± 18.4); disability: 14.3 (± 17.9)). In the 1-year follow-up, the stress types “tendency to worry”, “social isolation”, “work discontent” as well as vital exhaustion and negative life events were identified as risk factors for both pain intensity and pain-related disability. Within the 2-years follow-up, Lasso models identified the stress types “tendency to worry”, “social isolation”, “social conflicts”, and “perceived long-term stress” as potential risk factors for both pain intensity and disability. Furthermore, “self-efficacy” (“internality”, “self-concept”) and “social externality” play a role in reducing pain-related disability. Conclusion: Stress experiences in social and work-related contexts were identified as important risk factors for LBP 1 or 2 years in the future, even in subjects with low initial pain levels. Self-efficacy turned out to be a protective factor for pain development, especially in the long-term follow-up. Results suggest a differentiation of stress types in addressing psychosocial factors in research, prevention and therapy approaches. KW - low back pain KW - psychosocial risk factors KW - stress KW - self-efficacy KW - MiSpEx Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S223893 SN - 1178-7090 VL - 13 SP - 613 EP - 621 PB - Dove Medical Press CY - Albany, Auckland ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Wippert, Pia-Maria A1 - Arampatzis, Adamantios A1 - Banzer, Winfried A1 - Beck, Heidrun A1 - Hasenbring, Monika Ilona A1 - Schiltenwolf, Marcus A1 - Schneider, Christian A1 - Stengel, Dirk A1 - Platen, Petra A1 - Mayer, Frank T1 - Psychosoziale Risikofaktoren in der Entstehung von chronisch unspezifischen Rückenschmerzen BT - Auszug aus der methodischen Rationale der Multicenterstudien in MiSpEx JF - Zeitschrift für Sportpsychologie N2 - Chronisch unspezifische Rückenschmerzen (CURS) gehören international zu den häufigsten Schmerzphänomenen und können für Athletinnen und Athleten karrierelimitierend sein. Knapp ein Drittel der jährlichen Trainingsausfallzeiten werden auf CURS zurückgeführt. In der Entstehung von chronischen Schmerzen ist ein multifaktorielles Ätiologiemodell mit einem signifikanten Einfluss psychosozialer Risikofaktoren evident. Obwohl dies in der Allgemeinbevölkerung bereits gut erforscht ist, gibt es in der Sportwissenschaft vergleichsweise wenige Arbeiten darüber. Dieses Thema wird daher in drei Multicenterstudien und zahlreichen Teilstudien des MiSpEx-Netzwerks (Medicine in Spine-Exercise-Network, Förderzeitraum 2011 – 2018) aufgegriffen. Entsprechend der Empfehlung einer frühzeitigen Diagnostik von Chronifizierungsfaktoren in der „Nationalen Versorgungsleitlinie Kreuzschmerz“, beschäftigt sich das Netzwerk u. a. mit der Überprüfung, Entwicklung und Evaluation diagnostischer Möglichkeiten. Der vorliegende Beitrag beschreibt die Entwicklung einer Diagnostik von psychosozialen Risikofaktoren, die einerseits eine Einschätzung des Risikos der Entwicklung von CURS und andererseits eine individuelle Zuweisung zu (Trainings)Interventionen erlaubt. Es wird die Entwicklungsrationale beschrieben und dabei verschiedene methodische Herangehensweisen und Entscheidungssequenzen reflektiert. N2 - Chronic nonspecific low back pain (CLBP) is one of the most common pain syndromes globally. Attributing to one third of missed training days, CLBP can seriously affect athletes’ careers. Studies in the general population show a multifactorial etiology with significant influence of psychosocial risk factors in the development of CLBP. As less is known about this phenomenon in athletes, the MiSpEx Network (Medicine in Spine Exercise, funded from 2011 to 2018) has conducted three multicenter studies and numerous substudies investigating this topic. The network has been concerned with the testing, development, and evaluation of diagnostics, in accordance with the recommendation of the German National Treatment Guidelines for CLBP that risk factors be recognized and treated early. Our article describes the development of a diagnostic tool for psychosocial risk factors that allows (medical) practitioners to predict the occurrence of CLBP and to suggest individualized (trainings) interventions. We present the methodological approach and discuss various methodological issues. T2 - Psychosocial Risk Factors in the Development of Chronic Nonspecific Back Pain: On the Methodical Rationale of the Multicenter Studies in MiSpEx KW - CLBP KW - MiSpEx KW - yellow flags KW - diagnostics KW - PROGRESS Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1026/1612-5010/a000245 SN - 1612-5010 SN - 2190-6300 VL - 26 IS - 1 SP - 25 EP - 35 PB - Hogrefe CY - Göttingen ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Wippert, Pia-Maria A1 - De Witt Huberts, Jessie A1 - Klipker, Kathrin A1 - Gantz, Simone A1 - Schiltenwolf, Marcus A1 - Mayer, Frank T1 - Development and content of the behavioral therapy module of the MiSpEx intervention. Randomized, controlled trial on chronic nonspecific low back pain JF - Der Schmerz : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft zum Studium des Schmerzes, der Österreichischen Schmerzgesellschaft und der Deutschen Interdisziplinären Vereinigung für Schmerztherapie N2 - Back pain is a complex phenomenon that goes beyond a simple medical diagnosis. The aetiology and chronification of back pain can be best described as an interaction between biological, psychological, and social processes. However, to date, multimodal prevention and intervention programs for back pain that target all three aetiological factors have demonstrated limited effectiveness. This lack of supportive evidence for multimodal programmes in the treatment of back pain could be due to the fact that few programs are suitable for long-term and unsupervised use in everyday life. Moreover, in combining the elements from various therapies, little attention has been paid to the mechanisms underlying the synergistic effects of the separate components. In this contribution, we will describe the development of a new multimodal intervention for back pain that set out to address these limitations. To this end, the biological elements of neuromuscular adaptation is supplemented with cognitive behavioral and psychophysiological techniques in an intervention that can be followed at home as well as in clinics, and that is suitable for all grades of pain. The efficacy of this intervention will be tested in a multicentric randomized controlled longitudinal trial (n = 714) at five time points over a period of 6 months. Here we will describe the development and the content of this new intervention. KW - Chronic pain KW - Cognitive behavioral therapy KW - Psychoeducation KW - Combined modality therapy KW - Sensorimotor training Y1 - 2015 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00482-015-0044-y SN - 0932-433X SN - 1432-2129 VL - 29 IS - 6 SP - 658 EP - 663 PB - Springer CY - New York ER -