TY - JOUR T1 - forum:logopädie 32.2018, 1 T2 - Forum Logopädie : Zeitschrift des Deutschen Bundesverbandes für Logopädie e.V, dbl KW - Logopädie KW - Zeitschrift Y1 - 2018 SN - 0932-0547 VL - 32 IS - 1 PB - Schulz-Kirchner CY - Idstein ER - TY - JOUR T1 - forum:logopädie 32.2018, 2 T2 - Forum Logopädie : Zeitschrift des Deutschen Bundesverbandes für Logopädie e.V, dbl KW - Logopädie KW - Zeitschrift Y1 - 2018 SN - 0932-0547 VL - 32 IS - 2 PB - Schulz-Kirchner CY - Idstein ER - TY - JOUR T1 - forum:logopädie 32.2018, 3 T2 - Forum Logopädie : Zeitschrift des Deutschen Bundesverbandes für Logopädie e.V, dbl KW - Logopädie KW - Zeitschrift Y1 - 2018 SN - 0932-0547 VL - 32 IS - 3 PB - Schulz-Kirchner CY - Idstein ER - TY - JOUR T1 - forum:logopädie 32.2018, 4 T2 - Forum Logopädie : Zeitschrift des Deutschen Bundesverbandes für Logopädie e.V, dbl KW - Logopädie KW - Zeitschrift Y1 - 2018 SN - 0932-0547 VL - 32 IS - 4 PB - Schulz-Kirchner CY - Idstein ER - TY - JOUR T1 - forum:logopädie 32.2018, 5 T2 - Forum Logopädie : Zeitschrift des Deutschen Bundesverbandes für Logopädie e.V, dbl KW - Logopädie KW - Zeitschrift Y1 - 2018 SN - 0932-0547 VL - 32 IS - 5 PB - Schulz-Kirchner CY - Idstein ER - TY - JOUR T1 - forum:logopädie 32.2018, 6 T2 - Forum Logopädie : Zeitschrift des Deutschen Bundesverbandes für Logopädie e.V, dbl KW - Logopädie KW - Zeitschrift Y1 - 2018 SN - 0932-0547 VL - 32 IS - 6 PB - Schulz-Kirchner CY - Idstein ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Dietmar, Höttecke A1 - Buth, Katrin A1 - Koenen, Jenna A1 - Masanek, Nicole A1 - Reichwein, Wilko A1 - Scholten, Nina A1 - Sprenger, Sandra A1 - Stender, Peter A1 - Wöhlke, Carina T1 - Vernetzung von Fach und Fachdidaktik in der Hamburger Lehrerausbildung BT - Kohärenz in der universitären Lehrerbildung Y1 - 2018 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-428068 SN - 978-3-86956-438-8 SP - 29 EP - 51 PB - Universitätsverlag Potsdam CY - Potsdam ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Kleinlein, Thomas T1 - Matters of Interpretation BT - How to Conceptualize and Evaluate Change of Norms and Values in the International Legal Order T2 - KFG Working Paper Series N2 - This article analyses, from a methodological and theoretical perspective, how international legal method deals with change. Section 2 sets the stage, develops a legal perspective on change of norms and values in the international legal order and distinguishes between structural change and norm change. This is followed in sections 3 and 4 by an examination of doctrinal categories that provide techniques to process change in international legal practice. International legal method is equipped with several techniques to process—and to conceptualize and evaluate—change: ‘Formal’ norm change is a matter of the doctrine of sources. International law can also change ‘informally’ through the shifting meaning of norm texts. Both formal and informal change is a matter of interpretation. Therefore, section 5 aims at theorizing interpretive change. It examines the relationship between the sources of law and legal interpretation as categories of change and analyses theoretical perceptions of interpretive change. T3 - KFG Working Paper Series - 24 Y1 - 2018 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-422871 SN - 2509-3770 SN - 2509-3762 IS - 24 ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Kahombo, Balingene T1 - The Peace and Security Council of the African Union BT - Rise or Decline of Collective Security in Africa? T2 - KFG Working Paper Series N2 - This paper assesses, both quantitatively and qualitatively, the work of the Peace and Security Council (PSC) of the African Union (AU) with respect to peace support operations. It seeks to know whether the establishment of the PSC in 2002 is leading or has led to a rise or a decline of collective security in Africa. It is demonstrated that in regard to its relative legal and institutional robustness, the PSC can be perceived as a rise of collective security compared with its predecessor, the Central Organ of the Organisation of African Unity (OAU). However, it stagnates in terms of quantity and quality of actions on the ground. The main problem lies in the lack of sufficient operational autonomy from member states and international partners, such as the United Nations. Therefore, the PSC’s contribution to the maintenance of peace and security, and so the rise of the international rule of law in Africa is limited. The continent is still a war-torn region, affected by political crises and the expansion of terrorism in many countries. To solve this problem, AU member states should strengthen the PSC’s capacity, starting with the quick operationalisation of the African Standby Force. The implementation of the 2016 decision on alternative sources of financing AU’s institutions and activities is also a priority. In this regard, the political will of African states that may show that they want to take their organisation more seriously is required. This can further the AU self-reliance policy in collective security though the promotion of African solutions to African problems, and reduce the burden of the United Nations and other non-African actors’ interventions in the continent. T3 - KFG Working Paper Series - 23 Y1 - 2018 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-422864 SN - 2509-3770 SN - 2509-3762 IS - 23 ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Berman, Franklin T1 - Authority in International Law T2 - KFG Working Paper Series N2 - The author discusses the question of authority when determining the content of an international legal rule. Taking Article 38(1)(d) of the ICJ Statute as a point of departure, he determines through meticolous analysis what ranks as judicial decisions as well as teachings within the meaning of the norm. The author then proceeds to a number of factors to determine authoritativeness: objectivity, knowledgeability, depth of analysis, and the presence or otherwise of reasoning and, in particular, the persuasiveness of an opinion. In the case of judicial pronouncements, the author points out that the paradox between Article 59 and Article 38(1)(d) of the ICJ Statute is only an apparent one. While judgments of the Court are binding only between the parties, it is merely the underlying reasoning that can be taken into account in the context of Article 38(1)(d) if considered persuasive. Without central authority, authoritativenes in international law must always be earned which is also the reason for the lack of an hierarchical order between as well as within judicial pronouncements and learned writings though the former are usually more likely to fulfil the criteria of authoritativeness. In both cases, however, previously acquired reputation of a court or even an individual judge as well as of a learned writer can create a presumption of authoritativeness. On a more general level, the author concludes with a call for a more careful differentiation between the determination of law and its application. Putting the issue discussed into perspective, the author argues that situations of law determination arise, contrary to common understanding, in fact far less often than situations of law application. T3 - KFG Working Paper Series - 22 Y1 - 2018 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-422843 SN - 2509-3770 SN - 2509-3762 IS - 22 ER -