TY  - JOUR
A1  - Merli, Elena
ED  - Ambühl, Annemarie
T1  - Nota sul Silio Italico ‹politico› negli epigrammi di Marziale
JF  - thersites = tessellae – Birthday Issue for Christine Walde
N2  - In Martial’s epigrams Silius Italicus is portrayed as a man of learning, author of the Punica and admirer of Vergil’s works, but also as a public figure and a former consul of Rome. My paper focuses on the epigrams devoted to the ‘political’ Silius, and suggests to relate them mainly to a certain stage in Silius Italicus’ life and to a specific communication strategy.
KW  - Silius Italicus
KW  - Martial
KW  - Pliny the Younger
KW  - Neronian age
KW  - otium–negotium
KW  - literary patronage
KW  - senatorial class
Y1  - 2020
U6  - https://doi.org/10.34679/thersites.vol11.175
SN  - 2364-7612
VL  - 2020
IS  - 11
SP  - 205
EP  - 217
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - McNamara, James
T1  - Pliny, Tacitus and the Monuments of Pallas
JF  - The classical quarterly
N2  - This article is a discussion of Plin. Ep. 7.29 and Ep. 8.6, in which he presents his reaction to seeing the grave monument of Marcus Antonius Pallas, the freedman and minister of the Emperor Claudius, beside the Via Tiburtina. The monument records a senatorial vote of thanks to Pallas, and Pliny expresses intense indignation at the Senate’s subservience and at the power and influence wielded by a freedman. This article compares Pliny’s letters with Tacitus’ account of the senatorial vote of thanks to Pallas at Ann. 12.52–3 and explores the differences between the ways in which the two authors encourage readers to relate to past events. It is noted that the Pallas letters are unusual amongst Pliny’s let- ters for their treatment of material unconnected with the life and career of Pliny and his friends, and argued that in Ep. 7.29 Pliny uses language and attitudes drawn from satire to evoke the past. Ep. 8.6 is read as an idiosyncratic piece of historical enquiry, consider- ing Pliny’s use of citation and his anonymization of historical individuals. Both letters are considered in the context of the surrounding letters, and a hypothesis is offered regarding the identity of their addressee Montanus, considering evidence from Tacitus’ Histories and Annals. Discussion of Tac. Ann. 12.52–3 focusses on the use of irony. Pliny’s evocation of enargeia (‘vividness’) is compared with that of Tacitus. The article concludes with comparison of the historical accounts offered by Pliny and Tacitus through reflection on Juvenal, Satire 1.
KW  - Tacitus
KW  - Pliny the Younger
KW  - Marcus Antonius Pallas
KW  - Epistolography
KW  - Historiography
KW  - Claudius
KW  - Juvenal
KW  - satire
KW  - indignatio
Y1  - 2021
UR  - https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/classical-quarterly/article/pliny-tacitus-and-the-monuments-of-pallas/1E36F8EADA74731ADC1402627AE90409
U6  - https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838821000203
SN  - 0009-8388
SN  - 1471-6844
VL  - 71
IS  - 1
SP  - 308
EP  - 329
PB  - Cambridge Univ. Press
CY  - Cambridge
ER  -