TY - JOUR A1 - Klose, Tim A1 - Guillemoteau, Julien A1 - Simon, Francois-Xavier A1 - Tronicke, Jens T1 - Toward subsurface magnetic permeability imaging with electromagnetic induction sensors BT - Sensitivity computation and reconstruction of measured data JF - Geophysics N2 - In near-surface geophysics, small portable loop-loop electro-magnetic induction (EMI) sensors using harmonic sources with a constant and rather small frequency are increasingly used to investigate the electrical properties of the subsurface. For such sensors, the influence of electrical conductivity and magnetic permeability on the EMI response is well-understood. Typically, data analysis focuses on reconstructing an electrical conductivity model by inverting the out-of-phase response. However, in a variety of near-surface applications, magnetic permeability (or susceptibility) models derived from the in-phase (IP) response may provide important additional information. In view of developing a fast 3D inversion procedure of the IP response for a dense grid of measurement points, we first analyze the 3D sensitivity functions associated with a homogeneous permeable half-space. Then, we compare synthetic data computed using a linear forward-modeling method based on these sensitivity functions with synthetic data computed using full nonlinear forward-modeling methods. The results indicate the correctness and applicability of our linear forward-modeling approach. Furthermore, we determine the advantages of converting IP data into apparent permeability, which, for example, allows us to extend the applicability of the linear forward-modeling method to high-magnetic environments. Finally, we compute synthetic data with the linear theory for a model consisting of a controlled magnetic target and compare the results with field data collected with a four-configuration loop-loop EMI sensor. With this field-scale experiment, we determine that our linear forward-modeling approach can reproduce measured data with sufficiently small error, and, thus, it represents the basis for developing efficient inversion approaches. KW - Electromagnetics KW - Imaging KW - Magnetic+Susceptibility KW - Near+Surface KW - Modeling Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1190/GEO2017-0827.1 SN - 0016-8033 SN - 1942-2156 VL - 83 IS - 5 SP - E335 EP - E345 PB - Society of Exploration Geophysicists CY - Tulsa ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Guillemoteau, Julien A1 - Tronicke, Jens T1 - Non-standard electromagnetic induction sensor configurations: Evaluating sensitivities and applicability JF - Journal of applied geophysics N2 - For near surface geophysical surveys, small-fixed offset loop-loop electromagnetic induction (EMI) sensors are usually placed parallel to the ground surface (i.e., both loops are at the same height above ground). In this study, we evaluate the potential of making measurements with a system that is not parallel to the ground; i.e., by positioning the system at different inclinations with respect to ground surface. First, we present the Maxwell theory for inclined magnetic dipoles over a homogeneous half space. By analyzing the sensitivities of such configurations, we,show that varying the angle of the system would result in improved imaging capabilities. For example, we show that acquiring data with a vertical system allows detection of a conductive body with a better lateral resolution compared to data acquired using standard horizontal configurations. The synthetic responses are presented for a heterogeneous medium and compared to field data acquired in the historical Park Sanssouci in Potsdam, Germany. After presenting a detailed sensitivity analysis and synthetic examples of such ground conductivity measurements, we suggest a new strategy of acquisition that allows to better estimate the true distribution of electrical conductivity using instruments with a fixed, small offset between the loops. This strategy is evaluated using field data collected at a well-constrained test-site in Horstwalde (Germany). Here, the target buried utility pipes are best imaged using vertical system configurations demonstrating the potential of our approach for typical applications. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. Pill rights reserved. KW - Electromagnetics KW - EMI sensors KW - Loop-loop systems KW - Near surface geophysics KW - Civil engineering KW - Sensitivity analysis Y1 - 2015 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2015.04.008 SN - 0926-9851 SN - 1879-1859 VL - 118 SP - 15 EP - 23 PB - Elsevier CY - Amsterdam ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Streich, Rita A1 - Becken, Michael T1 - Electromagnetic fields generated by finite-length wire sources: comparison with point dipole solutions JF - Geophysical prospecting N2 - In present-day land and marine controlled-source electromagnetic (CSEM) surveys, electromagnetic fields are commonly generated using wires that are hundreds of metres long. Nevertheless, simulations of CSEM data often approximate these sources as point dipoles. Although this is justified for sufficiently large source-receiver distances, many real surveys include frequencies and distances at which the dipole approximation is inaccurate. For 1D layered media, electromagnetic (EM) fields for point dipole sources can be computed using well-known quasi-analytical solutions and fields for sources of finite length can be synthesized by superposing point dipole fields. However, the calculation of numerous point dipole fields is computationally expensive, requiring a large number of numerical integral evaluations. We combine a more efficient representation of finite-length sources in terms of components related to the wire and its end points with very general expressions for EM fields in 1D layered media. We thus obtain a formulation that requires fewer numerical integrations than the superposition of dipole fields, permits source and receiver placement at any depth within the layer stack and can also easily be integrated into 3D modelling algorithms. Complex source geometries, such as wires bent due to surface obstructions, can be simulated by segmenting the wire and computing the responses for each segment separately. We first describe our finite-length wire expressions and then present 1D and 3D examples of EM fields due to finite-length sources for typical land and marine survey geometries and discuss differences to point dipole fields. KW - Electromagnetics KW - Mathematical formulation KW - Modelling KW - Numerical study Y1 - 2011 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2010.00926.x SN - 0016-8025 VL - 59 IS - 2 SP - 361 EP - 374 PB - Wiley-Blackwell CY - Malden ER -