TY - JOUR A1 - Benduhn, Johannes A1 - Piersimoni, Fortunato A1 - Londi, Giacomo A1 - Kirch, Anton A1 - Widmer, Johannes A1 - Koerner, Christian A1 - Beljonne, David A1 - Neher, Dieter A1 - Spoltore, Donato A1 - Vandewal, Koen T1 - Impact of triplet excited states on the open-circuit voltage of organic solar cells JF - dvanced energy materials N2 - The best organic solar cells (OSCs) achieve comparable peak external quantum efficiencies and fill factors as conventional photovoltaic devices. However, their voltage losses are much higher, in particular those due to nonradiative recombination. To investigate the possible role of triplet states on the donor or acceptor materials in this process, model systems comprising Zn- and Cu-phthalocyanine (Pc), as well as fluorinated versions of these donors, combined with C-60 as acceptor are studied. Fluorination allows tuning the energy level alignment between the lowest energy triplet state (T-1) and the charge-transfer (CT) state, while the replacement of Zn by Cu as the central metal in the Pcs leads to a largely enhanced spin-orbit coupling. Only in the latter case, a substantial influence of the triplet state on the nonradiative voltage losses is observed. In contrast, it is found that for a large series of typical OSC materials, the relative energy level alignment between T-1 and the CT state does not substantially affect nonradiative voltage losses. KW - charge-transfer states KW - nonradiative voltage losses KW - organic solar cells KW - triplet excited states Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201800451 SN - 1614-6832 SN - 1614-6840 VL - 8 IS - 21 PB - Wiley-VCH CY - Weinheim ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Krückemeier, Lisa A1 - Rau, Uwe A1 - Stolterfoht, Martin A1 - Kirchartz, Thomas T1 - How to report record open-circuit voltages in lead-halide perovskite solar cells JF - Advanced energy materials N2 - Open-circuit voltages of lead-halide perovskite solar cells are improving rapidly and are approaching the thermodynamic limit. Since many different perovskite compositions with different bandgap energies are actively being investigated, it is not straightforward to compare the open-circuit voltages between these devices as long as a consistent method of referencing is missing. For the purpose of comparing open-circuit voltages and identifying outstanding values, it is imperative to use a unique, generally accepted way of calculating the thermodynamic limit, which is currently not the case. Here a meta-analysis of methods to determine the bandgap and a radiative limit for open-circuit voltage is presented. The differences between the methods are analyzed and an easily applicable approach based on the solar cell quantum efficiency as a general reference is proposed. KW - bandgap KW - fill factor losses KW - nonradiative voltage losses KW - photovoltaics KW - radiative limit KW - recombination KW - Shockley-Queisser model Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201902573 SN - 1614-6832 SN - 1614-6840 VL - 10 IS - 1 PB - Wiley-VCH CY - Weinheim ER -