TY - JOUR A1 - Sandhage-Hofmann, Alexandra A1 - Linstädter, Anja A1 - Kindermann, Liana A1 - Angombe, Simon A1 - Amelung, Wulf T1 - Conservation with elevated elephant densities sequesters carbon in soils despite losses of woody biomass JF - Global change biology N2 - Nature conservation and restoration in terrestrial ecosystems is often focused on increasing the numbers of megafauna, expecting them to have positive impacts on ecological self-regulation processes and biodiversity. In sub-Saharan Africa, conservation efforts also aspire to protect and enhance biodiversity with particular focus on elephants. However, elephant browsing carries the risk of woody biomass losses. In this context, little is known about how increasing elephant numbers affects carbon stocks in soils, including the subsoils. We hypothesized that (1) increasing numbers of elephants reduce tree biomass, and thus the amount of C stored therein, resulting (2) in a loss of soil organic carbon (SOC). If true, a negative carbon footprint could limit the sustainability of elephant conservation from a global carbon perspective. To test these hypotheses, we selected plots of low, medium, and high elephant densities in two national parks and adjacent conservancies in the Namibian component of the Kavango Zambezi Transfrontier Area (KAZA), and quantified carbon storage in both woody vegetation and soils (1 m). Analyses were supplemented by the assessment of soil carbon isotopic composition. We found that increasing elephant densities resulted in a loss of tree carbon storage by 6.4 t ha(-1). However, and in contrast to our second hypothesis, SOC stocks increased by 4.7 t ha(-1) with increasing elephant densities. These higher SOC stocks were mainly found in the topsoil (0-30 cm) and were largely due to the formation of SOC from woody biomass. A second carbon input source into the soils was megaherbivore dung, which contributed with 0.02-0.323 t C ha(-1) year(-1) to ecosystem carbon storage in the low and high elephant density plots, respectively. Consequently, increasing elephant density does not necessarily lead to a negative C footprint, as soil carbon sequestration and transient C storage in dung almost compensate for losses in tree biomass. KW - carbon sequestration KW - conservation KW - elephants KW - soil organic carbon KW - woody biomass Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15779 SN - 1354-1013 SN - 1365-2486 VL - 27 IS - 19 SP - 4601 EP - 4614 PB - Blackwell Science CY - Oxford [u.a.] ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Wiesmeier, Martin A1 - Munro, Sam A1 - Barthold, Frauke Katrin A1 - Steffens, Markus A1 - Schad, Peter A1 - Kögel-Knabner, Ingrid T1 - Carbon storage capacity of semi-arid grassland soils and sequestration potentials in northern China JF - Global change biology N2 - Organic carbon (OC) sequestration in degraded semi-arid environments by improved soil management is assumed to contribute substantially to climate change mitigation. However, information about the soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration potential in steppe soils and their current saturation status remains unknown. In this study, we estimated the OC storage capacity of semi-arid grassland soils on the basis of remote, natural steppe fragments in northern China. Based on the maximum OC saturation of silt and clay particles <20m, OC sequestration potentials of degraded steppe soils (grazing land, arable land, eroded areas) were estimated. The analysis of natural grassland soils revealed a strong linear regression between the proportion of the fine fraction and its OC content, confirming the importance of silt and clay particles for OC stabilization in steppe soils. This relationship was similar to derived regressions in temperate and tropical soils but on a lower level, probably due to a lower C input and different clay mineralogy. In relation to the estimated OC storage capacity, degraded steppe soils showed a high OC saturation of 78-85% despite massive SOC losses due to unsustainable land use. As a result, the potential of degraded grassland soils to sequester additional OC was generally low. This can be related to a relatively high contribution of labile SOC, which is preferentially lost in the course of soil degradation. Moreover, wind erosion leads to substantial loss of silt and clay particles and consequently results in a direct loss of the ability to stabilize additional OC. Our findings indicate that the SOC loss in semi-arid environments induced by intensive land use is largely irreversible. Observed SOC increases after improved land management mainly result in an accumulation of labile SOC prone to land use/climate changes and therefore cannot be regarded as contribution to long-term OC sequestration. KW - climate change KW - fine fraction KW - soil organic carbon KW - soil texture KW - steppe soils Y1 - 2015 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12957 SN - 1354-1013 SN - 1365-2486 VL - 21 IS - 10 SP - 3836 EP - 3845 PB - Wiley-Blackwell CY - Hoboken ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Hoffmann, Thomas A1 - Schlummer, Manuela A1 - Notebaert, Bastiaan A1 - Verstraeten, Gert A1 - Korup, Oliver T1 - Carbon burial in soil sediments from Holocene agricultural erosion, Central Europe JF - Global biogeochemical cycles N2 - Natural and human-induced erosion supplies high amounts of soil organic carbon (OC) to terrestrial drainage networks. Yet OC fluxes in rivers were considered in global budgets only recently. Modern estimates of annual carbon burial in inland river sediments of 0.6 Gt C, or 22% of C transferred from terrestrial ecosystems to river channels, consider only lakes and reservoirs and disregard any long-term carbon burial in hillslope or floodplain sediments. Here we present the first assessment of sediment-bound OC storage in Central Europe from a synthesis of similar to 1500 Holocene hillslope and floodplain sedimentary archives. We show that sediment storage increases with drainage-basin size due to more extensive floodplains in larger river basins. However, hillslopes retain hitherto unrecognized high amounts of eroded soils at the scale of large river basins such that average agricultural erosion rates during the Holocene would have been at least twice as high as reported previously. This anthropogenic hillslope sediment storage exceeds floodplain storage in drainage basins <10(5) km(2), challenging the notion that floodplains are the dominant sedimentary sinks. In terms of carbon burial, OC concentrations in floodplains exceed those on hillslopes, and net OC accumulation rates in floodplains (0.70.2 g C m(-2)a(-1)) surpass those on hillslopes (0.40.1 g C m(-2)a(-1)) over the last 7500 years. We conclude that carbon burial in floodplains and on hillslopes in Central Europe exceeds terrestrial carbon storage in lakes and reservoirs by at least 2 orders of magnitude and should thus be considered in continental carbon budgets. KW - soil organic carbon KW - human impact KW - soil erosion KW - hillslope KW - floodplain KW - deposition Y1 - 2013 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1002/gbc.20071 SN - 0886-6236 SN - 1944-9224 VL - 27 IS - 3 SP - 828 EP - 835 PB - American Geophysical Union CY - Washington ER -