TY - THES A1 - Teckentrup, Lisa T1 - Understanding predator-prey interactions T1 - Verstehen von Räuber-Beute-Interaktionen BT - the role of fear in structuring prey communities BT - die Rolle der Angst bei der Strukturierung von Beutetiergemeinschaften N2 - Predators can have numerical and behavioral effects on prey animals. While numerical effects are well explored, the impact of behavioral effects is unclear. Furthermore, behavioral effects are generally either analyzed with a focus on single individuals or with a focus on consequences for other trophic levels. Thereby, the impact of fear on the level of prey communities is overlooked, despite potential consequences for conservation and nature management. In order to improve our understanding of predator-prey interactions, an assessment of the consequences of fear in shaping prey community structures is crucial. In this thesis, I evaluated how fear alters prey space use, community structure and composition, focusing on terrestrial mammals. By integrating landscapes of fear in an existing individual-based and spatially-explicit model, I simulated community assembly of prey animals via individual home range formation. The model comprises multiple hierarchical levels from individual home range behavior to patterns of prey community structure and composition. The mechanistic approach of the model allowed for the identification of underlying mechanism driving prey community responses under fear. My results show that fear modified prey space use and community patterns. Under fear, prey animals shifted their home ranges towards safer areas of the landscape. Furthermore, fear decreased the total biomass and the diversity of the prey community and reinforced shifts in community composition towards smaller animals. These effects could be mediated by an increasing availability of refuges in the landscape. Under landscape changes, such as habitat loss and fragmentation, fear intensified negative effects on prey communities. Prey communities in risky environments were subject to a non-proportional diversity loss of up to 30% if fear was taken into account. Regarding habitat properties, I found that well-connected, large safe patches can reduce the negative consequences of habitat loss and fragmentation on prey communities. Including variation in risk perception between prey animals had consequences on prey space use. Animals with a high risk perception predominantly used safe areas of the landscape, while animals with a low risk perception preferred areas with a high food availability. On the community level, prey diversity was higher in heterogeneous landscapes of fear if individuals varied in their risk perception compared to scenarios in which all individuals had the same risk perception. Overall, my findings give a first, comprehensive assessment of the role of fear in shaping prey communities. The linkage between individual home range behavior and patterns at the community level allows for a mechanistic understanding of the underlying processes. My results underline the importance of the structure of the landscape of fear as a key driver of prey community responses, especially if the habitat is threatened by landscape changes. Furthermore, I show that individual landscapes of fear can improve our understanding of the consequences of trait variation on community structures. Regarding conservation and nature management, my results support calls for modern conservation approaches that go beyond single species and address the protection of biotic interactions. N2 - Raubtiere beeinflussen ihre Beute durch die Verringerung der Anzahl (numerische Effekte) und durch das Hervorrufen von Verhaltensänderungen (Verhaltenseffekte). Während die Auswirkungen von numerischen Effekten gut erforscht sind, sind die Auswirkungen von Verhaltenseffekten unklar. Außerdem werden bei Verhaltensänderungen selten die Auswirkungen auf die Beutetiergemeinschaft betrachtet, sondern nur die Effekte auf einzelne Individuen bzw. Arten oder auf andere Stufen der Nahrungskette. Eine Betrachtung auf der Stufe der Beutetiergemeinschaft ist jedoch sehr wichtig, da nur so ein umfassendes Verständnis von Räuber-Beute-Gemeinschaften möglich ist. In der vorliegenden Arbeit habe ich die Auswirkungen von Verhaltenseffekten auf die Raumnutzung und die Struktur von Beutetiergemeinschaften untersucht. Dazu habe ich ein räumliches Modell benutzt, welches die Bildung von Beutetiergemeinschaften über den individuellen Aufbau von Aktionsräumen der Beutetiere simuliert. Die Einrichtung von Aktionsräumen basiert dabei auf der Nahrungsverfügbarkeit in der Landschaft und auf dem vom Beutetier wahrgenommenen Risiko von einem Räuber gefressen zu werden. Die räumliche Verteilung des wahrgenommenen Risikos wird auch als Landschaft der Angst bezeichnet. Meine Ergebnisse zeigen, dass sich die Raumnutzung und die Struktur der Beutetiergemeinschaft durch Verhaltenseffekte verändern. Unter dem Einfluss von Angst haben die Beutetiere ihre Aktionsräume in sicherere Bereiche der Landschaft verlegt. Außerdem hat sich in risikoreichen Landschaften die Vielfalt der Beutetiere verringert und die Zusammensetzung zu Arten mit einem geringen Körpergewicht verschoben. Wenn die Beutetiergemeinschaft Landschaftsveränderungen wie z.B. dem Verlust oder der Zerschneidung von Lebensraum ausgesetzt war, haben sich die Auswirkungen von Verhaltenseffekten weiter verstärkt. Durch eine Erhöhung der Größe und Anzahl von Rückzugsräumen, die nicht von Räubern erreicht werden können, sowie deren Verbindung in der Landschaft, kann die Stärke dieser Effekte jedoch begrenzt werden. In einem weiteren Schritt habe ich die Auswirkungen von Unterschieden in der Risikowahrnehmung zwischen Individuen untersucht. Diese Unterschiede haben dazu geführt, dass Tiere mit einer hohen Risikowahrnehmung sich ihren Aktionsraum vornehmlich in sicheren Bereichen gesucht haben, während Tiere mit einer geringen Risikowahrnehmung Bereiche mit einer hohen Nahrungsverfügbarkeit genutzt haben. Dadurch konnten sich in Landschaften mit unterschiedlichen Risiken, vielfältigere Beutetiergemeinschaften etablieren, als in Landschaften mit gleichmäßigem Risiko. Insgesamt geben meine Ergebnisse einen guten Überblick über die Auswirkungen von Verhaltenseffekten auf Beutetiergemeinschaften. Die Verknüpfung von individuellem Verhalten mit Mustern auf der Gemeinschaftsebene erlaubt es die zugrundeliegenden Mechanismen zu identifizieren und zu verstehen. In Bezug auf den Naturschutz unterstützen meine Ergebnisse den Ruf nach modernen Schutzmaßnahmen, die über den Erhalt von einzelnen Arten hinausgehen und den Schutz von Beziehungen zwischen Arten einbeziehen. KW - ecology KW - landscape of fear KW - predator-prey KW - movement KW - biodiversity KW - Ökologie KW - Landschaft der Angst KW - Räuber-Beute KW - Bewegung KW - Biodiversität Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-431624 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Steinhoff, Philip O. M. A1 - Warfen, Bennet A1 - Voigt, Sissy A1 - Uhl, Gabriele A1 - Dammhahn, Melanie T1 - Individual differences in risk-taking affect foraging across different landscapes of fear JF - Oikos N2 - One of the strongest determinants of behavioural variation is the tradeoff between resource gain and safety. Although classical theory predicts optimal foraging under risk, empirical studies report large unexplained variation in behaviour. Intrinsic individual differences in risk-taking behaviour might contribute to this variation. By repeatedly exposing individuals of a small mesopredator to different experimental landscapes of risks and resources, we tested 1) whether individuals adjust their foraging behaviour according to predictions of the general tradeoff between energy gain and predation avoidance and 2) whether individuals differ consistently and predictably from each other in how they solve this tradeoff. Wild-caught individuals (n = 42) of the jumping spiderMarpissa muscosa, were subjected to repeated release and open-field tests to quantify among-individual variation in boldness and activity. Subsequently, individuals were tested in four foraging tests that differed in risk level (white/dark background colour) and risk variation (constant risk/variable risk simulated by bird dummy overflights) and contained inaccessible but visually perceivable food patches. When exposed to a white background, individuals reduced some aspects of movement and foraging intensity, suggesting that the degree of camouflage serves as a proxy of perceived risk in these predators. Short pulses of acute predation risk, simulated by bird overflights, had only small effects on aspects of foraging behaviour. Notably, a significant part of variation in foraging was due to among-individual differences across risk landscapes that are linked to consistent individual variation in activity, forming a behavioural syndrome. Our results demonstrate the importance of among-individual differences in behaviour of animals that forage under different levels of perceived risk. Since these differences likely affect food-web dynamics and have fitness consequences, future studies should explore the mechanisms that maintain the observed variation in natural populations. KW - animal personality KW - behavioural syndrome KW - foraging KW - jumping spider KW - landscape of fear KW - risk-reward tradeoff Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.07508 SN - 0030-1299 SN - 1600-0706 VL - 129 IS - 12 SP - 1891 EP - 1902 PB - Wiley CY - Hoboken ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Schlägel, Ulrike E. A1 - Merrill, Evelyn H. A1 - Lewis, Mark A. T1 - Territory surveillance and prey management: Wolves keep track of space and time JF - Ecology and evolution N2 - Identifying behavioral mechanisms that underlie observed movement patterns is difficult when animals employ sophisticated cognitive‐based strategies. Such strategies may arise when timing of return visits is important, for instance to allow for resource renewal or territorial patrolling. We fitted spatially explicit random‐walk models to GPS movement data of six wolves (Canis lupus; Linnaeus, 1758) from Alberta, Canada to investigate the importance of the following: (1) territorial surveillance likely related to renewal of scent marks along territorial edges, to reduce intraspecific risk among packs, and (2) delay in return to recently hunted areas, which may be related to anti‐predator responses of prey under varying prey densities. The movement models incorporated the spatiotemporal variable “time since last visit,” which acts as a wolf's memory index of its travel history and is integrated into the movement decision along with its position in relation to territory boundaries and information on local prey densities. We used a model selection framework to test hypotheses about the combined importance of these variables in wolf movement strategies. Time‐dependent movement for territory surveillance was supported by all wolf movement tracks. Wolves generally avoided territory edges, but this avoidance was reduced as time since last visit increased. Time‐dependent prey management was weak except in one wolf. This wolf selected locations with longer time since last visit and lower prey density, which led to a longer delay in revisiting high prey density sites. Our study shows that we can use spatially explicit random walks to identify behavioral strategies that merge environmental information and explicit spatiotemporal information on past movements (i.e., “when” and “where”) to make movement decisions. The approach allows us to better understand cognition‐based movement in relation to dynamic environments and resources. KW - animal movement KW - cognition KW - GPS data KW - landscape of fear KW - movement ecology KW - predator-prey KW - spatial memory KW - step selection KW - territoriality KW - time since last visit Y1 - 2017 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3176 SN - 2045-7758 VL - 7 SP - 8388 EP - 8405 PB - Wiley CY - Hoboken ER - TY - GEN A1 - Mendes Ferreira, Clara A1 - Dammhahn, Melanie A1 - Eccard, Jana T1 - Forager-mediated cascading effects on food resource species diversity T2 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe N2 - Perceived predation risk varies in space and time. Foraging in this landscape of fear alters forager-resource interactions via cascading nonconsumptive effects. Estimating these indirect effects is difficult in natural systems. Here, we applied a novel measure to quantify the diversity at giving-up density that allows to test how spatial variation in perceived predation risk modifies the diversity of multispecies resources at local and regional spatial levels. Furthermore, we evaluated whether the nonconsumptive effects on resource species diversity can be explained by the preferences of foragers for specific functional traits and by the forager species richness. We exposed rodents of a natural community to artificial food patches, each containing an initial multispecies resource community of eight species (10 items each) mixed in sand. We sampled 35 landscapes, each containing seven patches in a spatial array, to disentangle effects at local (patch) and landscape levels. We used vegetation height as a proxy for perceived predation risk. After a period of three nights, we counted how many and which resource species were left in each patch to measure giving-up density and resource diversity at the local level (alpha diversity) and the regional level (gamma diversity and beta diversity). Furthermore, we used wildlife cameras to identify foragers and assess their species richness. With increasing vegetation height, i.e., decreasing perceived predation risk, giving-up density, and local alpha and regional gamma diversity decreased, and patches became less similar within a landscape (beta diversity increased). Foragers consumed more of the bigger and most caloric resources. The higher the forager species richness, the lower the giving-up density, and alpha and gamma diversity. Overall, spatial variation of perceived predation risk of foragers had measurable cascading effects on local and regional resource species biodiversity, independent of the forager species. Thus, nonconsumptive predation effects modify forager-resource interactions and might act as an equalizing mechanism for species coexistence. T3 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe - 1312 KW - coexistence KW - functional traits KW - giving-up density KW - landscape of fear KW - perceived predation risk Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-585092 SN - 1866-8372 IS - 1312 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Mendes Ferreira, Clara A1 - Dammhahn, Melanie A1 - Eccard, Jana T1 - Forager-mediated cascading effects on food resource species diversity JF - Ecology and Evolution N2 - Perceived predation risk varies in space and time. Foraging in this landscape of fear alters forager-resource interactions via cascading nonconsumptive effects. Estimating these indirect effects is difficult in natural systems. Here, we applied a novel measure to quantify the diversity at giving-up density that allows to test how spatial variation in perceived predation risk modifies the diversity of multispecies resources at local and regional spatial levels. Furthermore, we evaluated whether the nonconsumptive effects on resource species diversity can be explained by the preferences of foragers for specific functional traits and by the forager species richness. We exposed rodents of a natural community to artificial food patches, each containing an initial multispecies resource community of eight species (10 items each) mixed in sand. We sampled 35 landscapes, each containing seven patches in a spatial array, to disentangle effects at local (patch) and landscape levels. We used vegetation height as a proxy for perceived predation risk. After a period of three nights, we counted how many and which resource species were left in each patch to measure giving-up density and resource diversity at the local level (alpha diversity) and the regional level (gamma diversity and beta diversity). Furthermore, we used wildlife cameras to identify foragers and assess their species richness. With increasing vegetation height, i.e., decreasing perceived predation risk, giving-up density, and local alpha and regional gamma diversity decreased, and patches became less similar within a landscape (beta diversity increased). Foragers consumed more of the bigger and most caloric resources. The higher the forager species richness, the lower the giving-up density, and alpha and gamma diversity. Overall, spatial variation of perceived predation risk of foragers had measurable cascading effects on local and regional resource species biodiversity, independent of the forager species. Thus, nonconsumptive predation effects modify forager-resource interactions and might act as an equalizing mechanism for species coexistence. KW - coexistence KW - functional traits KW - giving-up density KW - landscape of fear KW - perceived predation risk Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9523 SN - 2045-7758 VL - 12 IS - 11 PB - John Wiley & Sons ER - TY - THES A1 - Mendes Ferreira, Clara T1 - Indirect, tri-trophic effects of fear on biodiversity N2 - Predator-forager interactions are a major factor in evolutionary adaptation of many species, as predators need to gain energy by consuming prey species, and foragers needs to avoid the worst fate of mortality while still consuming resources for energetic gains. In this evolutionary arms race, the foragers have constantly evolved anti-predator behaviours (e.g. foraging activity changes). To describe all these complex changes, researchers developed the framework of the landscape of fear, that is, the spatio-temporal variation of perceived predation risk. This concept simplifies all the involved ecological processes into one framework, by integrating animal biology and distribution with habitat characteristics. Researchers can then evaluate the perception of predation risk in prey species, what are the behavioural responses of the prey and, therefore, understand the cascading effects of landscapes of fear at the resource levels (tri-trophic effects). Although tri-trophic effects are well studied at the predator-prey interaction level, little is known on how the forager-resource interactions are part of the overall cascading effects of landscapes of fear, despite the changes of forager feeding behaviour - that occur with perceived predation risk - affecting directly the level of the resources. This thesis aimed to evaluate the cascading effects of the landscape of fear on biodiversity of resources, and how the feeding behaviour and movement of foragers shaped the final resource species composition (potential coexistence mechanisms). We studied the changes caused by landscapes of fear on wild and captive rodent communities and evaluated: the cascading effects of different landscapes of fear on a tri-trophic system (I), the effects of fear on a forager’s movement patterns and dietary preferences (II) and cascading effects of different types of predation risk (terrestrial versus avian, III). In Chapter I, we applied a novel measure to evaluate the cascading effects of fear at the level of resources, by quantifying the diversity of resources left after the foragers gave-up on foraging (diversity at the giving-up density). We tested the measure at different spatial levels (local and regional) and observed that with decreased perceived predation risk, the density and biodiversity of resources also decreased. Foragers left a very dissimilar community of resources based on perceived risk and resources functional traits, and therefore acted as an equalising mechanism. In Chapter II, we wanted to understand further the decision-making processes of rodents in different landscapes of fear, namely, in which resource species rodents decided to forage on (based on three functional traits: size, nutrients and shape) and how they moved depending on perceived predation risk. In safe landscapes, individuals increased their feeding activity and movements and despite the increased costs, they visited more often patches that were further away from their central-place. Despite a preference for the bigger resources regardless of risk, when perceived predation risk was low, individuals changed their preference to fat-rich resources. In Chapter III, we evaluated the cascading effects of two different types of predation risk in rodents: terrestrial (raccoon) versus avian predation risk. Raccoon presence or absence did not alter the rodents feeding behaviour in different landscapes of fear. Rodent’s showed risk avoidance behaviours towards avian predators (spatial risk avoidance), but not towards raccoons (lack of temporal risk avoidance). By analysing the effects of fear in tri-trophic systems, we were able to deepen the knowledge of how non-consumptive effects of predators affect the behaviour of foragers, and quantitatively measure the cascading effects at the level of resources with a novel measure. Foragers are at the core of the ecological processes and responses to the landscape of fear, acting as variable coexistence agents for resource species depending on perceived predation risk. This newly found measures and knowledge can be applied to more trophic chains, and inform researchers on biodiversity patterns originating from landscapes of fear. N2 - Die Wechselwirkungen zwischen Raubtier und Beute sind ein wichtiger Faktor in der Evolution der Tierwelt, da sich die Raubtiere anpassen müssen, um ihre Beute besser jagen zu können und die Beutetiere vermeiden müssen, gefressen zu werden, während sie immer noch genügend Ressourcen für ihre täglichen Bedürfnisse verbrauchen. In diesem ständigen Kampf müssen die Beutetiere ihr Verhalten ständig ändern, da sie die Anwesenheit von Raubtieren fürchten. Die Landschaft der Angst ist ein Rahmen, der alle ökologischen Prozesse beschreibt, die ablaufen, wenn die Tiere das Raubtierrisiko auf unterschiedliche Weise wahrnehmen. In Angstlandschaften reichen die indirekten Auswirkungen der Angst vor einem Raubtier aus, um eine Vielzahl von Reaktionen bei den Beutetieren hervorzurufen und folglich die Art und Weise zu beeinflussen, in der die Beutetiere Naturgutstype fressen (tritrophe Effekte). Während die Interaktionen zwischen Raubtieren und Beutetieren gut erforscht sind, fehlt es an Wissen darüber, wie die Landschaft der Angst die Interaktionen zwischen Beutetieren und Naturgutstype beeinflussen kann (z. B. Pflanzenfresser, die Pflanzen fressen). In dieser Arbeit untersuchten wir die Kaskadeneffekte (d.h. Domino Effekte), die Beutetiere auf Naturgutstype haben, wenn sie verschiedene Prädationsrisiken wahrnehmen. Insbesondere wollten wir untersuchen, wie die Beutetiere entscheiden, was sie fressen und wohin sie sich bewegen, wie sich diese Veränderungen auf die biologische Vielfalt der Ressourcen auswirken können und welche Folgen dies für die Evolution der Ressourcenarten hat. Für alle unsere Studien haben wir Nagetiere als Modellarten verwendet. Wir entwickelten ein neues Maß zur Quantifizierung der Auswirkungen von Angst auf die biologische Vielfalt von Ressourcen und testeten es erfolgreich an wilden Nagetierpopulationen. Wir konnten beobachten, dass die Nagetiere unterschiedliche Samenarten und -mengen fressen, je nachdem, wie sie das Raubtierrisiko einschätzen und abhängig von den Eigenschaften der Samen und der Art der vorhandenen Raubtiere (terrestrische oder aviäre Fleischfresser). Wir konnten diese Veränderungen quantifizieren und Vorhersagen darüber machen, wie sich der Wettbewerb zwischen den Samen um das Wachstum verändern würde (Koexistenzmechanismen). Mit diesem Wissen haben wir den Rahmen der Angstlandschaft um die komplexen Wechselwirkungen zwischen Beute und Ressourcen erweitert und können unsere Erkenntnisse auch dazu nutzen, um zu verstehen, wie weitere Tierarten die biologische Vielfalt anderer Arten verändern, indem wir einfach verstehen, wie ängstlich sie sind. KW - landscape of fear KW - functional traits KW - foraging behaviour KW - biodiversity KW - giving-up density KW - cascading effects KW - Biodiversität KW - Kaskadeneffekte KW - Futtersuchverhalten KW - funktionale Merkmale KW - Landschaft der Angst Y1 - 2023 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-611020 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Eccard, Jana A1 - Mendes Ferreira, Clara A1 - Peredo Arce, Andres A1 - Dammhahn, Melanie T1 - Top-down effects of foraging decisions on local, landscape and regional biodiversity of resources (DivGUD) JF - Ecology letters N2 - Foraging by consumers acts as a biotic filtering mechanism for biodiversity at the trophic level of resources. Variation in foraging behaviour has cascading effects on abundance, diversity, and functional trait composition of the community of resource species. Here we propose diversity at giving-up density (DivGUD), i.e. when foragers quit exploiting a patch, as a novel concept and simple measure quantifying cascading effects at multiple spatial scales. In experimental landscapes with an assemblage of plant seeds, patch residency of wild rodents decreased local alpha-DivGUD (via elevated mortality of species with large seeds) and regional gamma-DivGUD, while dissimilarity among patches in a landscape (beta-DivGUD) increased. By linking theories of adaptive foraging behaviour with community ecology, DivGUD allows to investigate cascading indirect predation effects, e.g. the ecology-of-fear framework, feedbacks between functional trait composition of resource species and consumer communities, and effects of inter-individual differences among foragers on the biodiversity of resource communities. KW - biodiversity KW - cascading effects KW - foraging behaviour KW - functional traits KW - giving-up density KW - landscape of fear KW - optimal foraging KW - patch use Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13901 SN - 1461-0248 VL - 25 IS - 1 SP - 3 EP - 16 PB - Wiley-Blackwell CY - Oxford [u.a.] ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Eccard, Jana A1 - Liesenjohann, Thilo A1 - Dammhahn, Melanie T1 - Among-individual differences in foraging modulate resource exploitation under perceived predation risk JF - Oecologia N2 - Foraging is risky and involves balancing the benefits of resource acquisition with costs of predation. Optimal foraging theory predicts where, when and how long to forage in a given spatiotemporal distribution of risks and resources. However, significant variation in foraging behaviour and resource exploitation remain unexplained. Using single foragers in artificial landscapes of perceived risks and resources with diminishing returns, we aimed to test whether foraging behaviour and resource exploitation are adjusted to risk level, vary with risk during different components of foraging, and (co)vary among individuals. We quantified foraging behaviour and resource exploitation for 21 common voles (Microtus arvalis). By manipulating ground cover, we created simple landscapes of two food patches varying in perceived risk during feeding in a patch and/or while travelling between patches. Foraging of individuals was variable and adjusted to risk level and type. High risk during feeding reduced feeding duration and food consumption more strongly than risk while travelling. Risk during travelling modified the risk effects of feeding for changes between patches and resulting evenness of resource exploitation. Across risk conditions individuals differed consistently in when and how long they exploited resources and exposed themselves to risk. These among-individual differences in foraging behaviour were associated with consistent patterns of resource exploitation. Thus, different strategies in foraging-under-risk ultimately lead to unequal payoffs and might affect lower trophic levels in food webs. Inter-individual differences in foraging behaviour, i.e. foraging personalities, are an integral part of foraging behaviour and need to be fully integrated into optimal foraging theory. KW - animal personality KW - giving-up density KW - intra-specific trait variation KW - landscape of fear KW - optimal foraging KW - predation risk KW - resource KW - exploitation Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-020-04773-y SN - 0029-8549 SN - 1432-1939 VL - 194 IS - 4 SP - 621 EP - 634 PB - Springer CY - Berlin ER -