TY - JOUR A1 - Kollodzeiski, Ulrike T1 - Die Geburt der Religion? BT - Genealogie in der Religionswissenschaft JF - Zeitschrift für Religionswissenschaft N2 - In diesem Artikel geht es darum, die Genealogie im Anschluss an Michel Foucault für die Religionswissenschaft fruchtbar zu machen und ihr Programm zu schärfen. Dazu hebe ich zuerst einige wesentliche Aspekte hervor, welche die Genealogie ausmachen. Im Folgenden untersuche ich den Artikel „Umkämpfte Historisierung“ von Michael Bergunder als ein aktuelles Beispiel für die Anwendung der Genealogie in der Religionswissenschaft. Diesem stelle ich im letzten Teil des Artikels meine eigene Genealogie von Religion gegenüber. Ich zeige, wie sich die Konstitution eines spezifisch religiösen Bereichs und die nominalistische Auffassung seiner Zeichen innerhalb des Ritenstreits im Kontext von Mission in Asien seit dem 16. Jh. vollzogen hat. Wie Religion verstanden wurde, hing dabei unmittelbar davon ab, welche kolonialen Interessen durchgesetzt werden sollten. Die Verstrickung von Religion in den Zusammenhang von Macht-Subjekt-Wissen muss deshalb zukünftig konsequenter auch durch die Religionswissenschaft untersucht werden. Religion ist keine unschuldige Kategorie der Beobachtung, sondern über sie wurden und werden Kämpfe um Macht und gesellschaftlichen Einfluss ausgetragen. N2 - The aim of this article is to make genealogy, following Michel Foucault,useful for the study of religions and to sharpen its program. To this end, I first highlight some essential aspects that constitute genealogy. Hereafter, I analyze Michael Bergunder’s article “Umkämpfte Historisierung” as a recent example of the application of genealogy. I contrast it with my own genealogy of religion in the last part of the article. I show how the constitution of a specifically religious sphere and the nominalist conception of its signs took place within the rites controversies in the context of mission in Asia since the 16th century. How religion was conceived directly depended on which colonial interests were to be enforced. Therefore, the entanglement of religion in the context of power-subject-knowledge must be investigated more consistently in the future by the study of religion. Religion is not an innocent category of observation; rather, it has been and continues to be used in struggles for power and social influence KW - Genealogie KW - Michel Foucault KW - Religionsbegriff KW - Religionswissenschaft KW - Ritenstreit KW - Genealogy KW - notion of religion KW - study of religion KW - rites controversies Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1515/zfr-2021-0011 SN - 2194-508X VL - 29 IS - 2 SP - 238 EP - 258 PB - de Gruyter CY - Berlin ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Thulin, Mirjam A1 - Krah, Markus A1 - Gausemeier, Bernd A1 - Mecklenburg, Frank A1 - Oehme, Annegret A1 - Tamás, Máté A1 - Gerlach, Lisa A1 - Gräbe, Viktoria A1 - Wermke, Michael A1 - Oleshkevich, Ekaterina A1 - Arnold, Rafael D. A1 - Wendehorst, Stephan A1 - Talabardon, Susanne A1 - Mays, Devi A1 - Müller, Judith A1 - Herskovitz, Yaakov A1 - Garloff, Katja A1 - Kellenbach, Katharina von A1 - Held, Marcus A1 - Grözinger, Karl Erich ED - Thulin, Mirjam ED - Krah, Markus ED - Pick, Bianca T1 - PaRDeS : Journal of the Association for Jewish Studies in Germany = Jewish Families and Kinship in the Early Modern and Modern Eras T2 - PaRDeS : Zeitschrift der Vereinigung für Jüdische Studien T2 - PaRDeS : Journal of the Association for Jewish Studies in Germany N2 - The Jewish family has been the subject of much admiration and analysis, criticism and myth-making, not just but especially in modern times. As a field of inquiry, its place is at the intersection – or in the shadow – of the great topics in Jewish Studies and its contributing disciplines. Among them are the modernization and privatization of Judaism and Jewish life; integration and distinctiveness of Jews as individuals and as a group; gender roles and education. These and related questions have been the focus of modern Jewish family research, which took shape as a discipline in the 1910s. This issue of PaRDeS traces the origins of academic Jewish family research and takes stock of its development over a century, with its ruptures that have added to the importance of familial roots and continuities. A special section retrieves the founder of the field, Arthur Czellitzer (1871–1943), his biography and work from oblivion and places him in the context of early 20th-century science and Jewish life. The articles on current questions of Jewish family history reflect the topic’s potential for shedding new light on key questions in Jewish Studies past and present. Their thematic range – from 13th-century Yiddish Arthurian romances via family-based business practices in 19th-century Hungary and Germany, to concepts of Jewish parenthood in Imperial Russia – illustrates the broad interest in Jewish family research as a paradigm for early modern and modern Jewish Studies. T3 - PaRDeS : Zeitschrift der Vereinigung für Jüdische Studien e.V. - 26 KW - Modern Jewish history KW - family history KW - early modern history KW - Jewish Studies KW - genealogy KW - Moderne Jüdische Geschichte KW - Familiengeschichte KW - Frühe Neuzeit KW - Jüdische Studien KW - Genealogie Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-473654 SN - 978-3-86956-493-7 SN - 1614-6492 SN - 1862-7684 IS - 26 PB - Universitätsverlag Potsdam CY - Potsdam ER -