TY - GEN A1 - Bösel, Bernd T1 - Affect Disposition(ing) BT - A Genealogical Approach to the Organization and Regulation of Emotions T2 - Media and Communication N2 - The “affective turn” has been primarily concerned not with what affect is, but what it does. This article focuses on yet another shift towards how affect gets organized, i.e., how it is produced, classified, and controlled. It proposes a genealogical as well as a critical approach to the organization of affect and distinguishes between several “affect disposition(ing) regimes”—meaning paradigms of how to interpret and manage affects, for e.g., encoding them as byproducts of demonic possession, judging them in reference to a moralistic framework, or subsuming them under an industrial regime. Bernard Stiegler’s concept of psychopower will be engaged at one point and expanded to include social media and affective technologies, especially Affective Computing. Finally, the industrialization and cybernetization of affect will be contrasted with poststructuralist interpretations of affects as events. T3 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe - 151 KW - affect KW - Affective Computing KW - disposition KW - emotions KW - event KW - eventology KW - genealogy KW - psychopower KW - theory Y1 - 2018 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-418309 SP - 15 EP - 21 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Bösel, Bernd T1 - Affect Disposition(ing) BT - A Genealogical Approach to the Organization and Regulation of Emotions JF - Media and Communication N2 - The “affective turn” has been primarily concerned not with what affect is, but what it does. This article focuses on yet another shift towards how affect gets organized, i.e., how it is produced, classified, and controlled. It proposes a genealogical as well as a critical approach to the organization of affect and distinguishes between several “affect disposition(ing) regimes”—meaning paradigms of how to interpret and manage affects, for e.g., encoding them as byproducts of demonic possession, judging them in reference to a moralistic framework, or subsuming them under an industrial regime. Bernard Stiegler’s concept of psychopower will be engaged at one point and expanded to include social media and affective technologies, especially Affective Computing. Finally, the industrialization and cybernetization of affect will be contrasted with poststructuralist interpretations of affects as events. KW - affect KW - Affective Computing KW - disposition KW - emotions KW - event KW - eventology KW - genealogy KW - psychopower KW - theory Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i3.1460 VL - 6 IS - 3 SP - 15 EP - 21 PB - Cogitatio Press CY - Lissabon ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Bösel, Bernd T1 - Affect Disposition(ing) BT - a genealogical approach to the organization and regulation of emotions JF - Media and Communication N2 - The “affective turn” has been primarily concerned not with what affect is, but what it does. This article focuses on yet another shift towards how affect gets organized, i.e., how it is produced, classified, and controlled. It proposes a genealogical as well as a critical approach to the organization of affect and distinguishes between several “affect disposition(ing) regimes”—meaning paradigms of how to interpret and manage affects, for e.g., encoding them as byproducts of demonic possession, judging them in reference to a moralistic framework, or subsuming them under an industrial regime. Bernard Stiegler’s concept of psychopower will be engaged at one point and expanded to include social media and affective technologies, especially Affective Computing. Finally, the industrialization and cybernetization of affect will be contrasted with poststructuralist interpretations of affects as events. KW - affect KW - Affective Computing KW - disposition KW - emotions KW - event KW - eventology KW - genealogy KW - psychopower KW - theory Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i3.1460 SN - 2183-2439 VL - 6 IS - 3 SP - 15 EP - 21 PB - Cogitatio Press CY - Lisbon ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Thulin, Mirjam A1 - Krah, Markus A1 - Gausemeier, Bernd A1 - Mecklenburg, Frank A1 - Oehme, Annegret A1 - Tamás, Máté A1 - Gerlach, Lisa A1 - Gräbe, Viktoria A1 - Wermke, Michael A1 - Oleshkevich, Ekaterina A1 - Arnold, Rafael D. A1 - Wendehorst, Stephan A1 - Talabardon, Susanne A1 - Mays, Devi A1 - Müller, Judith A1 - Herskovitz, Yaakov A1 - Garloff, Katja A1 - Kellenbach, Katharina von A1 - Held, Marcus A1 - Grözinger, Karl Erich ED - Thulin, Mirjam ED - Krah, Markus ED - Pick, Bianca T1 - PaRDeS : Journal of the Association for Jewish Studies in Germany = Jewish Families and Kinship in the Early Modern and Modern Eras T2 - PaRDeS : Zeitschrift der Vereinigung für Jüdische Studien T2 - PaRDeS : Journal of the Association for Jewish Studies in Germany N2 - The Jewish family has been the subject of much admiration and analysis, criticism and myth-making, not just but especially in modern times. As a field of inquiry, its place is at the intersection – or in the shadow – of the great topics in Jewish Studies and its contributing disciplines. Among them are the modernization and privatization of Judaism and Jewish life; integration and distinctiveness of Jews as individuals and as a group; gender roles and education. These and related questions have been the focus of modern Jewish family research, which took shape as a discipline in the 1910s. This issue of PaRDeS traces the origins of academic Jewish family research and takes stock of its development over a century, with its ruptures that have added to the importance of familial roots and continuities. A special section retrieves the founder of the field, Arthur Czellitzer (1871–1943), his biography and work from oblivion and places him in the context of early 20th-century science and Jewish life. The articles on current questions of Jewish family history reflect the topic’s potential for shedding new light on key questions in Jewish Studies past and present. Their thematic range – from 13th-century Yiddish Arthurian romances via family-based business practices in 19th-century Hungary and Germany, to concepts of Jewish parenthood in Imperial Russia – illustrates the broad interest in Jewish family research as a paradigm for early modern and modern Jewish Studies. T3 - PaRDeS : Zeitschrift der Vereinigung für Jüdische Studien e.V. - 26 KW - Modern Jewish history KW - family history KW - early modern history KW - Jewish Studies KW - genealogy KW - Moderne Jüdische Geschichte KW - Familiengeschichte KW - Frühe Neuzeit KW - Jüdische Studien KW - Genealogie Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-473654 SN - 978-3-86956-493-7 SN - 1614-6492 SN - 1862-7684 IS - 26 PB - Universitätsverlag Potsdam CY - Potsdam ER -