TY - JOUR A1 - Kulla, Patricia A1 - Schlegl, Sandra A1 - Külz, Anne Katrin A1 - Förstner, Ulrich A1 - Warschburger, Petra A1 - Voderholzer, Ulrich T1 - Functions of OCD - Development and Initial Validation of a Questionnaire (FFZ) JF - Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, medizinische Psychologie N2 - The aim of this study was the development and psychometric assessment of a questionnaire for functions of OCD (FFZ). The instrument was analyzed using factor and item analyses with a sample of 120 OCD patients within the first 5 weeks of an inpatient cognitive-behavioral treatment. The revealed scales were OCD as self-confirmation, emotion regulation, avoidance of responsibility, interpersonal regulation and OCD as occupation. The reliabilities of all subscales and the total value were satisfactory to nearly excellent. The factorial validity was good, content validity was excellent. The FFZ shows correlations with measures of interpersonal problems and emotional competence, but none with measures of self-reflection and therapy experience. No differences were found for gender or age. The results provide initial support for the reliability and validity of the FFZ. KW - OCD KW - functions KW - questionnaire KW - validation KW - development Y1 - 2015 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1394459 SN - 0937-2032 SN - 1439-1058 VL - 65 IS - 6 SP - 213 EP - 222 PB - Thieme CY - Stuttgart ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kirsch, Fabian A1 - Rohlf, Helena L. A1 - Krahé, Barbara T1 - Measuring anger regulation in middle childhood through behavioural observation: a longitudinal validation JF - European journal of developmental psychology N2 - Learning to regulate anger is an important task in childhood development, as maladaptive anger regulation has been linked to a variety of problems, including aggression and social rejection. To assess anger regulation in situ, in a previous study we developed a behavioural observation measure and demonstrated its cross-sectional construct and criterion validity in a sample of 599 children with a mean age of 8.1years. The present study further validated the measure by demonstrating its predictive validity. About 10months after the behavioural observation, participants were asked to imagine two anger-eliciting situations and report what they would do to get rid of their anger. Observed anger regulation strategies at T1 correlated significantly with self-reported regulatory behaviour at T2, suggesting that the behavioural observation measure is an ecologically valid approach for assessing anger regulation in middle childhood. KW - Anger regulation KW - observation KW - childhood KW - validation KW - longitudinal study Y1 - 2015 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2015.1101375 SN - 1740-5629 SN - 1740-5610 VL - 12 IS - 6 SP - 718 EP - 727 PB - Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group CY - Abingdon ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Hahn, Daniela A1 - Weck, Florian A1 - Witthöft, Michael A1 - Kühne, Franziska T1 - Assessment of counseling self-efficacy BT - validation of the German Counselor Activity self-efficacy scales-revised JF - Frontiers in psychology / Frontiers Research Foundation N2 - Background: Many authors regard counseling self-efficacy (CSE) as important in therapist development and training. The purpose of this study was to examine the factor structure, reliability, and validity of the German version of the Counselor Activity Self-Efficacy Scales-Revised (CASES-R). Method: The sample consisted of 670 German psychotherapy trainees, who completed an online survey. We examined the factor structure by applying exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis to the instrument as a whole. Results: A bifactor-exploratory structural equation modeling model with one general and five specific factors provided the best fit to the data. Omega hierarchical coefficients indicated optimal reliability for the general factor, acceptable reliability for the Action Skills-Revised (AS-R) factor, and insufficient estimates for the remaining factors. The CASES-R scales yielded significant correlations with related measures, but also with therapeutic orientations. Conclusion: We found support for the reliability and validity of the German CASES-R. However, the subdomains (except AS-R) should be interpreted with caution, and we do not recommend the CASES-R for comparisons between psychotherapeutic orientations. KW - counselor activity self-efficacy scales KW - counseling self-efficacy KW - psychotherapy training KW - assessment KW - factor structure KW - validation Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.780088 SN - 1664-1078 VL - 12 PB - Frontiers Research Foundation CY - Lausanne ER -