TY - JOUR A1 - Merz, Bruno A1 - Basso, Stefano A1 - Fischer, Svenja A1 - Lun, David A1 - Bloeschl, Guenter A1 - Merz, Ralf A1 - Guse, Bjorn A1 - Viglione, Alberto A1 - Vorogushyn, Sergiy A1 - Macdonald, Elena A1 - Wietzke, Luzie A1 - Schumann, Andreas T1 - Understanding heavy tails of flood peak distributions JF - Water resources research N2 - Statistical distributions of flood peak discharge often show heavy tail behavior, that is, extreme floods are more likely to occur than would be predicted by commonly used distributions that have exponential asymptotic behavior. This heavy tail behavior may surprise flood managers and citizens, as human intuition tends to expect light tail behavior, and the heaviness of the tails is very difficult to predict, which may lead to unnecessarily high flood damage. Despite its high importance, the literature on the heavy tail behavior of flood distributions is rather fragmented. In this review, we provide a coherent overview of the processes causing heavy flood tails and the implications for science and practice. Specifically, we propose nine hypotheses on the mechanisms causing heavy tails in flood peak distributions related to processes in the atmosphere, the catchment, and the river system. We then discuss to which extent the current knowledge supports or contradicts these hypotheses. We also discuss the statistical conditions for the emergence of heavy tail behavior based on derived distribution theory and relate them to the hypotheses and flood generation mechanisms. We review the degree to which the heaviness of the tails can be predicted from process knowledge and data. Finally, we recommend further research toward testing the hypotheses and improving the prediction of heavy tails. KW - extreme events KW - flood frequency KW - flood risk KW - upper tail Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030506 SN - 0043-1397 SN - 1944-7973 VL - 58 IS - 6 PB - American Geophysical Union CY - Washington ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Devitt, Laura A1 - Neal, Jeffrey A1 - Wagener, Thorsten A1 - Coxon, Gemma T1 - Uncertainty in the extreme flood magnitude estimates of large-scale flood hazard models JF - Environmental research letters : ERL / Institute of Physics N2 - The growing worldwide impact of flood events has motivated the development and application of global flood hazard models (GFHMs). These models have become useful tools for flood risk assessment and management, especially in regions where little local hazard information is available. One of the key uncertainties associated with GFHMs is the estimation of extreme flood magnitudes to generate flood hazard maps. In this study, the 1-in-100 year flood (Q100) magnitude was estimated using flow outputs from four global hydrological models (GHMs) and two global flood frequency analysis datasets for 1350 gauges across the conterminous US. The annual maximum flows of the observed and modelled timeseries of streamflow were bootstrapped to evaluate the sensitivity of the underlying data to extrapolation. Results show that there are clear spatial patterns of bias associated with each method. GHMs show a general tendency to overpredict Western US gauges and underpredict Eastern US gauges. The GloFAS and HYPE models underpredict Q100 by more than 25% in 68% and 52% of gauges, respectively. The PCR-GLOBWB and CaMa-Flood models overestimate Q100 by more than 25% at 60% and 65% of gauges in West and Central US, respectively. The global frequency analysis datasets have spatial variabilities that differ from the GHMs. We found that river basin area and topographic elevation explain some of the spatial variability in predictive performance found in this study. However, there is no single model or method that performs best everywhere, and therefore we recommend a weighted ensemble of predictions of extreme flood magnitudes should be used for large-scale flood hazard assessment. KW - large-scale flood hazard models KW - global hydrological model KW - flood risk Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abfac4 SN - 1748-9326 VL - 16 IS - 6 PB - IOP Publ. Ltd. CY - Bristol ER - TY - THES A1 - Metin Usta, Ayşe Duha T1 - The role of risk components and spatial dependence in flood risk estimations N2 - Flooding is a vast problem in many parts of the world, including Europe. It occurs mainly due to extreme weather conditions (e.g. heavy rainfall and snowmelt) and the consequences of flood events can be devastating. Flood risk is mainly defined as a combination of the probability of an event and its potential adverse impacts. Therefore, it covers three major dynamic components: hazard (physical characteristics of a flood event), exposure (people and their physical environment that being exposed to flood), and vulnerability (the elements at risk). Floods are natural phenomena and cannot be fully prevented. However, their risk can be managed and mitigated. For a sound flood risk management and mitigation, a proper risk assessment is needed. First of all, this is attained by a clear understanding of the flood risk dynamics. For instance, human activity may contribute to an increase in flood risk. Anthropogenic climate change causes higher intensity of rainfall and sea level rise and therefore an increase in scale and frequency of the flood events. On the other hand, inappropriate management of risk and structural protection measures may not be very effective for risk reduction. Additionally, due to the growth of number of assets and people within the flood-prone areas, risk increases. To address these issues, the first objective of this thesis is to perform a sensitivity analysis to understand the impacts of changes in each flood risk component on overall risk and further their mutual interactions. A multitude of changes along the risk chain are simulated by regional flood model (RFM) where all processes from atmosphere through catchment and river system to damage mechanisms are taken into consideration. The impacts of changes in risk components are explored by plausible change scenarios for the mesoscale Mulde catchment (sub-basin of the Elbe) in Germany. A proper risk assessment is ensured by the reasonable representation of the real-world flood event. Traditionally, flood risk is assessed by assuming homogeneous return periods of flood peaks throughout the considered catchment. However, in reality, flood events are spatially heterogeneous and therefore traditional assumption misestimates flood risk especially for large regions. In this thesis, two different studies investigate the importance of spatial dependence in large scale flood risk assessment for different spatial scales. In the first one, the “real” spatial dependence of return period of flood damages is represented by continuous risk modelling approach where spatially coherent patterns of hydrological and meteorological controls (i.e. soil moisture and weather patterns) are included. Further the risk estimations under this modelled dependence assumption are compared with two other assumptions on the spatial dependence of return periods of flood damages: complete dependence (homogeneous return periods) and independence (randomly generated heterogeneous return periods) for the Elbe catchment in Germany. The second study represents the “real” spatial dependence by multivariate dependence models. Similar to the first study, the three different assumptions on the spatial dependence of return periods of flood damages are compared, but at national (United Kingdom and Germany) and continental (Europe) scales. Furthermore, the impacts of the different models, tail dependence, and the structural flood protection level on the flood risk under different spatial dependence assumptions are investigated. The outcomes of the sensitivity analysis framework suggest that flood risk can vary dramatically as a result of possible change scenarios. The risk components that have not received much attention (e.g. changes in dike systems and in vulnerability) may mask the influence of climate change that is often investigated component. The results of the spatial dependence research in this thesis further show that the damage under the false assumption of complete dependence is 100 % larger than the damage under the modelled dependence assumption, for the events with return periods greater than approximately 200 years in the Elbe catchment. The complete dependence assumption overestimates the 200-year flood damage, a benchmark indicator for the insurance industry, by 139 %, 188 % and 246 % for the UK, Germany and Europe, respectively. The misestimation of risk under different assumptions can vary from upstream to downstream of the catchment. Besides, tail dependence in the model and flood protection level in the catchments can affect the risk estimation and the differences between different spatial dependence assumptions. In conclusion, the broader consideration of the risk components, which possibly affect the flood risk in a comprehensive way, and the consideration of the spatial dependence of flood return periods are strongly recommended for a better understanding of flood risk and consequently for a sound flood risk management and mitigation. N2 - Hochwasser sind ein großes Problem und treten hauptsächlich aufgrund extremer Wetterbedingungen (z. B. starker Regen und Schneeschmelze) auf. Die Folgen von Hochwasserereignissen können verheerend sein. Das Konzept des Hochwasserrisikos beinhaltet die drei Komponenten: Gefahr, Exposition und Vulnerabilität. Hochwasser sind natürliche Phänomene und können nicht sicher verhindert werden. Das Risiko kann jedoch gesteuert und gemindert werden. Für ein solides Hochwasserrisikomanagement und die Minderung des Risikos ist eine ordnungsgemäße Risikobewertung und ein klares Verständnis der Hochwasserrisikodynamik erforderlich. Beispielsweise verursacht der anthropogene Klimawandel eine höhere Intensität der Niederschläge und einen Anstieg des Meeresspiegels und damit eine Zunahme des Ausmaßes und der Häufigkeit von Hochwasserereignissen. Andererseits können unangemessene strukturelle Schutzmaßnahmen, das Anwachsen von Vermögenswerten und eine steigende Anzahl betroffener Personen in den hochwassergefährdeten Gebieten das Risiko erhöhen. Um diese Probleme zu adressieren, besteht ein Ziel dieser Arbeit aus der Durchführung einer Sensitivitätsanalyse, um die Auswirkungen von Änderungen in jeder Hochwasserrisikokomponente auf das Gesamtrisiko und deren Wechselwirkungen untereinander zu verstehen. Eine angemessene Risikobewertung wird auch durch die korrekte k Darstellung des realen Hochwasserereignisses erreicht. Traditionell wird das Hochwasserrisiko bewertet, indem homogene Wiederkehrintervalle von Hochwasserspitzen im gesamten Einzugsgebiet angenommen werden. In der Realität sind Hochwasserereignisse jedoch räumlich heterogen, weshalb die traditionelle Annahme von Homogenität das Hochwasserrisiko insbesondere für große Einzugsgebiete falsch einschätzt. In dieser Arbeit wird die Bedeutung der räumlichen Abhängigkeit bei der Bewertung des Hochwasserrisikos in großem Maßstab in zwei Studien für verschiedene räumliche Skalen untersucht. In der ersten Untersuchung wird die „reale“ räumliche Abhängigkeit durch einen kontinuierlichen Risikomodellierungsansatz dargestellt. Zusätzlich werden die Risikoabschätzungen unter dieser modellierten Abhängigkeitsannahme mit zwei weiteren Annahmen zur räumlichen Abhängigkeit der Wiederkehrintervalle von Hochwasser verglichen: vollständige Abhängigkeit und Unabhängigkeit für das Elbeeinzugsgebiet in Deutschland. Die zweite Studie repräsentiert die „reale“ räumliche Abhängigkeit durch ein copula-basiertes Abhängigkeitsmodell. In ähnlicher Weise werden die drei verschiedenen Annahmen zur räumlichen Abhängigkeit der Wiederkehrintervalle von Hochwasser auf nationaler und kontinentaler Ebene verglichen. Außerdem wird der Einfluss von „Tail-dependences“ im Modell sowie von Hochwasserschutzmaßnahmen auf die räumliche Abhängigkeit untersucht. Die Ergebnisse dieser Arbeit unter Anwendung des Sensitivitätsanalyse-Frameworks zeigen, dass das Hochwasserrisiko aufgrund möglicher Änderungsszenarien dramatisch variieren kann. Der Einfluss des Klimawandels kann durch Änderungen anderer Risikokomponenten (z. B. Änderungen der Deichsysteme und der Vulnerabilität) überdeckt werden. Die Untersuchung zur räumlichen Abhängigkeit zeigen, dass der Schaden unter der Annahme vollständiger Abhängigkeit für Ereignisse mit Wiederkehrintervalle von mehr als ungefähr 200 Jahren im Elbeeinzugsgebiet 100 % größer als der Schaden unter modellierter Abhängigkeit. Die Annahme vollständiger Abhängigkeit überschätzt den 200-jährigen Hochwasserschaden, einen Referenzindikator für die Versicherungsbranche, um 139 %, 188 % und 246 % für Vereinigte Königreich, Deutschland und Europa. Die Fehleinschätzung des Hochwasserrisikos kann unter verschiedenen Annahmen von Abhängigkeit zwischen Oberlauf und Unterlauf eines Einzugsgebietes stark variieren. Zudem können „Tail-dependences“ im Modell sowie der Hochwasserschutz im Einzugsgebiet die Ergebnisse der Risikoabschätzung, unter verschiedenen Annahmen der räumlichen Abhängigkeit, beeinflussen. Abschließend wird eine umfangreiche Berücksichtigung der Risikokomponenten und insbesondere der räumlichen Abhängigkeit von Wiederkehrintervallen stark empfohlen, um das Hochwasserrisiko und damit dessen Management und Minderung besser verstehen zu können. T2 - Die Rolle von Risikokomponenten und räumlicher Abhängigkeit bei Hochwasserrisikoabschätzungen KW - flood risk KW - sensitivity analysis KW - hazard KW - river flooding KW - vulnerability KW - spatial dependence KW - damage estimation KW - continuous simulation KW - flood risk assessment KW - kontinuierliche Simulation KW - Schadensabschätzung KW - Hochwasserrisiko KW - Hochwasserrisikobewertung KW - Gefahr KW - Flusshochwasser KW - Sensitivitätsanalyse KW - räumliche Abhängigkeit KW - Vulnerabilität Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-492554 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Bryant, Seth A1 - Davies, Evan A1 - Sol, David A1 - Davis, Sandy T1 - The progression of flood risk in southern Alberta since the 2013 flood JF - Journal of flood risk management N2 - After a century of semi-restricted floodplain development, Southern Alberta, Canada, was struck by the devastating 2013 Flood. Aging infrastructure and limited property-level floodproofing likely contributed to the $4-6 billion (CAD) losses. Following this catastrophe, Alberta has seen a revival in flood management, largely focused on structural protections. However, concurrent with the recent structural work was a 100,000+ increase in Calgary's population in the 5 years following the flood, leading to further densification of high-hazard areas. This study implements the novel Stochastic Object-based Flood damage Dynamic Assessment (SOFDA) model framework to quantify the progression of the direct-damage flood risk in a mature urban neighborhood after the 2013 Flood. Five years of remote-sensing data, property assessment records, and inundation simulations following the flood are used to construct the model. Results show that in these 5 years, vulnerability trends (like densification) have increased flood risk by 4%; however, recent structural mitigation projects have reduced overall flood risk by 47% for this case study. These results demonstrate that the flood management revival in Southern Alberta has largely been successful at reducing flood risk; however, the gains are under threat from continued development and densification absent additional floodproofing regulations. KW - Calgary KW - depth-damage functions KW - expected annual damages KW - flood risk KW - model KW - property level protection measures KW - risk analysis KW - risk dynamics Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12811 SN - 1753-318X VL - 15 IS - 3 PB - Wiley-Blackwell CY - Oxford ER - TY - GEN A1 - Hudson, Paul A1 - Thieken, Annegret A1 - Bubeck, Philip T1 - The challenges of longitudinal surveys in the flood risk domain T2 - Postprints der Universität Potsdam Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe N2 - There has been much research regarding the perceptions, preferences, behaviour, and responses of people exposed to flooding and other nat- ural hazards. Cross-sectional surveys have been the predominant method applied in such research. While cross-sectional data can provide a snapshot of a respondent’s behaviour and perceptions, it cannot be assumed that the respondent’s perceptions are constant over time. As a result, many important research questions relating to dynamic processes, such as changes in risk perceptions, adaptation behaviour, and resilience cannot be fully addressed by cross-sectional surveys. To overcome these shortcomings, there has been a call for developing longitudinal (or panel) datasets in research on natural hazards, vulnerabilities, and risks. However, experiences with implementing longitudinal surveys in the flood risk domain (FRD), which pose distinct methodological challenges, are largely lacking. The key problems are sample recruitment, attrition rate, and attrition bias. We present a review of the few existing longitudinal surveys in the FRD. In addition, we investigate the potential attrition bias and attrition rates in a panel dataset of flood-affected households in Germany. We find little potential for attrition bias to occur. High attrition rates across longitudinal survey waves are the larger concern. A high attrition rate rapidly depletes the longitudinal sample. To overcome high attrition, longitudinal data should be collected as part of a multisector partnership to allow for sufficient resources to implement sample retention strategies. If flood-specific panels are developed, different sample retention strategies should be applied and evaluated in future research to understand how much-needed longitudinal surveying techniques can be successfully applied to the study of individuals threatened by flooding. T3 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe - 759 KW - attrition bias KW - longitudinal KW - flood risk KW - panel KW - attrition rate Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-434092 SN - 1866-8372 IS - 759 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Hudson, Paul T1 - The affordability of flood risk property-level adaptation measures JF - Risk Analysis N2 - The affordability of property-level adaptation measures against flooding is crucial due to the movement toward integrated flood risk management, which requires the individuals threatened by flooding to actively manage flooding. It is surprising to find that affordability is not often discussed, given the important roles that affordability and social justice play regarding flood risk management. This article provides a starting point for investigating the potential rate of unaffordability of flood risk property-level adaptation measures across Europe using two definitions of affordability, which are combined with two different affordability thresholds from within flood risk research. It uses concepts of investment and payment affordability, with affordability thresholds based on residual income and expenditure definitions of unaffordability. These concepts, in turn, are linked with social justice through fairness concerns, in that, all should have equal capability to act, of which affordability is one avenue. In doing so, it was found that, for a large proportion of Europe, property owners generally cannot afford to make one-time payment of the cost of protective measures. These can be made affordable with installment payment mechanisms or similar mechanisms that spread costs over time. Therefore, the movement toward greater obligations for flood-prone residents to actively adapt to flooding should be accompanied by socially accessible financing mechanisms. KW - Affordability KW - flood risk KW - social justice KW - risk reduction Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13465 SN - 0272-4332 SN - 1539-6924 VL - 40 IS - 6 SP - 1151 EP - 1167 PB - Wiley CY - Hoboken ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Hudson, Paul A1 - Hagedoorn, Liselotte A1 - Bubeck, Philip T1 - Potential linkages between social capital, flood risk perceptions, and self-efficacy JF - International journal of disaster risk science N2 - A growing focus is being placed on both individuals and communities to adapt to flooding as part of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030. Adaptation to flooding requires sufficient social capital (linkages between members of society), risk perceptions (understanding of risk), and self-efficacy (self-perceived ability to limit disaster impacts) to be effective. However, there is limited understanding of how social capital, risk perceptions, and self-efficacy interact. We seek to explore how social capital interacts with variables known to increase the likelihood of successful adaptation. To study these linkages we analyze survey data of 1010 respondents across two communities in Thua Tien-Hue Province in central Vietnam, using ordered probit models. We find positive correlations between social capital, risk perceptions, and self-efficacy overall. This is a partly contrary finding to what was found in previous studies linking these concepts in Europe, which may be a result from the difference in risk context. The absence of an overall negative exchange between these factors has positive implications for proactive flood risk adaptation. KW - flood risk KW - protection motivation theory KW - risk perceptions KW - social KW - capital KW - self-efficacy KW - Vietnam Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-020-00259-w SN - 2095-0055 SN - 2192-6395 VL - 11 IS - 3 SP - 251 EP - 262 PB - Springer CY - Berlin ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Philips, Andrea A1 - Walz, Ariane A1 - Bergner, Andreas G. N. A1 - Gräff, Thomas A1 - Heistermann, Maik A1 - Kienzler, Sarah A1 - Korup, Oliver A1 - Lipp, Torsten A1 - Schwanghart, Wolfgang A1 - Zeilinger, Gerold T1 - Immersive 3D geovisualization in higher education JF - Journal of geography in higher education N2 - In this study, we investigate how immersive 3D geovisualization can be used in higher education. Based on MacEachren and Kraak's geovisualization cube, we examine the usage of immersive 3D geovisualization and its usefulness in a research-based learning module on flood risk, called GEOSimulator. Results of a survey among participating students reveal benefits, such as better orientation in the study area, higher interactivity with the data, improved discourse among students and enhanced motivation through immersive 3D geovisualization. This suggests that immersive 3D visualization can effectively be used in higher education and that 3D CAVE settings enhance interactive learning between students. KW - immersive 3D geovisualization KW - 3D CAVE KW - higher education KW - learning success KW - student survey KW - flood risk Y1 - 2015 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2015.1066314 SN - 0309-8265 SN - 1466-1845 VL - 39 IS - 3 SP - 437 EP - 449 PB - Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group CY - Abingdon ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Sairam, Nivedita A1 - Schroeter, Kai A1 - Rözer, Viktor A1 - Merz, Bruno A1 - Kreibich, Heidi T1 - Hierarchical Bayesian Approach for Modeling Spatiotemporal Variability in Flood Damage Processes JF - Water resources research N2 - Flood damage processes are complex and vary between events and regions. State-of-the-art flood loss models are often developed on the basis of empirical damage data from specific case studies and do not perform well when spatially and temporally transferred. This is due to the fact that such localized models often cover only a small set of possible damage processes from one event and a region. On the other hand, a single generalized model covering multiple events and different regions ignores the variability in damage processes across regions and events due to variables that are not explicitly accounted for individual households. We implement a hierarchical Bayesian approach to parameterize widely used depth-damage functions resulting in a hierarchical (multilevel) Bayesian model (HBM) for flood loss estimation that accounts for spatiotemporal heterogeneity in damage processes. We test and prove the hypothesis that, in transfer scenarios, HBMs are superior compared to generalized and localized regression models. In order to improve loss predictions for regions and events for which no empirical damage data are available, we use variables pertaining to specific region- and event-characteristics representing commonly available expert knowledge as group-level predictors within the HBM. KW - flood risk KW - flood loss model transfer KW - multilevel probabilistic flood loss model Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025068 SN - 0043-1397 SN - 1944-7973 VL - 55 IS - 10 SP - 8223 EP - 8237 PB - American Geophysical Union CY - Washington ER - TY - GEN A1 - Unterberger, Christian A1 - Hudson, Paul A1 - Botzen, W. J. Wouter A1 - Schroeer, Katharina A1 - Steininger, Karl W. T1 - Future public sector flood risk and risk sharing arrangements BT - an assessment for Austria T2 - Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe N2 - Climate change, along with socio-economic development, will increase the economic impacts of floods. While the factors that influence flood risk to private property have been extensively studied, the risk that natural disasters pose to public infrastructure and the resulting implications on public sector budgets, have received less attention. We address this gap by developing a two-staged model framework, which first assesses the flood risk to public infrastructure in Austria. Combining exposure and vulnerability information at the building level with inundation maps, we project an increase in riverine flood damage, which progressively burdens public budgets. Second, the risk estimates are integrated into an insurance model, which analyzes three different compensation arrangements in terms of the monetary burden they place on future governments' budgets and the respective volatility of payments. Formalized insurance compensation arrangements offer incentives for risk reduction measures, which lower the burden on public budgets by reducing the vulnerability of buildings that are exposed to flooding. They also significantly reduce the volatility of payments and thereby improve the predictability of flood damage expenditures. These features indicate that more formalized insurance arrangements are an improvement over the purely public compensation arrangement currently in place in Austria. T3 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe - 634 KW - climate change KW - adaptation KW - flood risk KW - insurance KW - public sector KW - risk reduction Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-424629 SN - 1866-8372 IS - 634 ER -