TY - GEN A1 - Brinkmann, Maik A1 - Heine, Moreen T1 - Can Blockchain Leverage for New Public Governance? BT - a Conceptual Analysis on Process Level T2 - Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance N2 - New Public Governance (NPG) as a paradigm for collaborative forms of public service delivery and Blockchain governance are trending topics for researchers and practitioners alike. Thus far, each topic has, on the whole, been discussed separately. This paper presents the preliminary results of ongoing research which aims to shed light on the more concrete benefits of Blockchain for the purpose of NPG. For the first time, a conceptual analysis is conducted on process level to spot benefits and limitations of Blockchain-based governance. Per process element, Blockchain key characteristics are mapped to functional aspects of NPG from a governance perspective. The preliminary results show that Blockchain offers valuable support for governments seeking methods to effectively coordinate co-producing networks. However, the extent of benefits of Blockchain varies across the process elements. It becomes evident that there is a need for off-chain processes. It is, therefore, argued in favour of intensifying research on off-chain governance processes to better understand the implications for and influences on on-chain governance. KW - Blockchain KW - New Public Governance KW - Blockchain Governance KW - Co-production KW - Conceptual Fit KW - Blockchain-enabled Governance Y1 - 2019 SN - 978-1-4503-6644-1 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1145/3326365.3326409 SP - 338 EP - 341 PB - Association for Computing Machinery CY - New York ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Eigelshoven, Felix A1 - Gronau, Norbert A1 - Ullrich, André T1 - Konsens-Algorithmen von Blockchain BT - eine Betrachtung der Nachhaltigkeit der Konsensfindung JF - Industrie 4.0 Management : Gegenwart und Zukunft industrieller Geschäftsprozesse N2 - Neben dem enormen Kursanstieg des Bitcoins in den Jahren 2017/2018, stieg im gleichen Maß auch die benötigte Rechenleistung und der damit verbundene Elektrizitätsbedarf, um Blöcke innerhalb der Bitcoin-Blockchain zu verifizieren. Aus diesem Problem ableitend beschäftigt sich dieser Beitrag mit der Fragestellung, welchen Beitrag unterschiedliche Konsens-Algorithmen innerhalb einer Blockchain zur Nachhaltigkeit liefern. Im Ergebnis liegt ein Überblick über die meist genutzten Konsens-Algorithmen und deren Beitrag zur Nachhaltigkeit vor. KW - Konsens-Algorithmen KW - Blockchain KW - proof of work KW - proof of stake KW - delegated proof of stake KW - Nachhaltigkeit Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.30844/I40M_20-1_S29-32 SN - 2364-9208 VL - 36 IS - 1 SP - 29 EP - 32 PB - Gito CY - Berlin ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Eigelshoven, Felix A1 - Ullrich, André A1 - Bender, Benedict T1 - Public blockchain BT - a systematic literature review on the sustainability of consensus algorithms T2 - Proceedings of the 28th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS)- A Virtual AIS Conference N2 - Blockchain has the potential to change business transactions to a major extent. Thereby, underlying consensus algorithms are the core mechanism to achieve consistency in distributed infrastructures. Their application aims for transparency and accountability in societal transactions. As a result of missing reviews holistically covering consensus algorithms, we aim to (1) identify prevalent consensus algorithms for public blockchains, and (2) address the resource perspective with a sustainability consideration (whereby we address the three spheres of sustainability). Our systematic literature review identified 33 different consensus algorithms for public blockchains. Our contribution is twofold: first, we provide a systematic summary of consensus algorithms for public blockchains derived from the scientific literature as well as real-world applications and systemize them according to their research focus; second, we assess the sustainability of consensus algorithms using a representative sample and thereby highlight the gaps in literature to address the holistic sustainability of consensus algorithms. KW - Blockchain KW - Consensus algorithms KW - Sustainability KW - Systematic literature revieew Y1 - 2020 UR - https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2020_rp/202 SP - 1 EP - 19 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Grüner, Andreas A1 - Mühle, Alexander A1 - Gayvoronskaya, Tatiana A1 - Meinel, Christoph T1 - A quantifiable trustmModel for Blockchain-based identity management T2 - IEEE 2018 International Congress on Cybermatics / 2018 IEEE Conferences on Internet of Things, Green Computing and Communications, cyber, physical and Social Computing, Smart Data, Blockchain, Computer and Information Technology KW - Blockchain KW - distributed ledger technology KW - digital identity KW - self-sovereign identity KW - trust KW - identity management Y1 - 2019 SN - 978-1-5386-7975-3 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1109/Cybermatics_2018.2018.00250 SP - 1475 EP - 1482 PB - IEEE CY - New York ER - TY - GEN A1 - Haarmann, Stephan A1 - Batoulis, Kimon A1 - Nikaj, Adriatik A1 - Weske, Mathias T1 - DMN Decision Execution on the Ethereum Blockchain T2 - Advanced Information Systems Engineering, CAISE 2018 N2 - Recently blockchain technology has been introduced to execute interacting business processes in a secure and transparent way. While the foundations for process enactment on blockchain have been researched, the execution of decisions on blockchain has not been addressed yet. In this paper we argue that decisions are an essential aspect of interacting business processes, and, therefore, also need to be executed on blockchain. The immutable representation of decision logic can be used by the interacting processes, so that decision taking will be more secure, more transparent, and better auditable. The approach is based on a mapping of the DMN language S-FEEL to Solidity code to be run on the Ethereum blockchain. The work is evaluated by a proof-of-concept prototype and an empirical cost evaluation. KW - Blockchain KW - Interacting processes KW - DMN Y1 - 2018 SN - 978-3-319-91563-0 SN - 978-3-319-91562-3 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91563-0_20 SN - 0302-9743 SN - 1611-3349 VL - 10816 SP - 327 EP - 341 PB - Springer CY - Cham ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Mendling, Jan A1 - Weber, Ingo A1 - van der Aalst, Wil A1 - Brocke, Jan Vom A1 - Cabanillas, Cristina A1 - Daniel, Florian A1 - Debois, Soren A1 - Di Ciccio, Claudio A1 - Dumas, Marlon A1 - Dustdar, Schahram A1 - Gal, Avigdor A1 - Garcia-Banuelos, Luciano A1 - Governatori, Guido A1 - Hull, Richard A1 - La Rosa, Marcello A1 - Leopold, Henrik A1 - Leymann, Frank A1 - Recker, Jan A1 - Reichert, Manfred A1 - Reijers, Hajo A. A1 - Rinderle-Ma, Stefanie A1 - Solti, Andreas A1 - Rosemann, Michael A1 - Schulte, Stefan A1 - Singh, Munindar P. A1 - Slaats, Tijs A1 - Staples, Mark A1 - Weber, Barbara A1 - Weidlich, Matthias A1 - Weske, Mathias A1 - Xu, Xiwei A1 - Zhu, Liming T1 - Blockchains for Business Process Management BT - Challenges and Opportunities JF - ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems N2 - Blockchain technology offers a sizable promise to rethink the way interorganizational business processes are managed because of its potential to realize execution without a central party serving as a single point of trust (and failure). To stimulate research on this promise and the limits thereof, in this article, we outline the challenges and opportunities of blockchain for business process management (BPM). We first reflect how blockchains could be used in the context of the established BPM lifecycle and second how they might become relevant beyond. We conclude our discourse with a summary of seven research directions for investigating the application of blockchain technology in the context of BPM. KW - Blockchain KW - business process management KW - research challenges Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1145/3183367 SN - 2158-656X SN - 2158-6578 VL - 9 IS - 1 SP - 1 EP - 16 PB - Association for Computing Machinery CY - New York ER - TY - THES A1 - Schmeiss, Jessica T1 - Designing value architectures for emerging technologies BT - empirical insights on the role of the firm in system-wide innovation N2 - The business model has emerged as a construct to understand how firms drive innovation through emerging technologies. It is defined as the ‘architecture of the firm’s value creation, delivery and appropriation mechanisms’ (Foss & Saebi, 2018, p. 5). The architecture is characterized by complex functional interrelations between activities that are conducted by various actors, some within and some outside of the firm. In other words, a firm’s value architecture is embedded within a wider system of actors that all contribute to the output of the value architecture. The question of what drives innovation within this system and how the firm can shape and navigate this innovation is an essential question within innova- tion management research. This dissertation is a compendium of four individual research articles that examine how the design of a firm’s value architecture can fa- cilitate system-wide innovation in the context of Artificial Intelligence and Block- chain Technology. The first article studies how firms use Blockchain Technology to design a governance infrastructure that enables innovation within a platform ecosystem. The findings propose a framework for blockchain-enabled platform ecosystems that address the essential problem of opening the platform to allow for innovation while also ensuring that all actors get to capture their share of the value. The second article analyzes how German Artificial Intelligence startups design their business models. It identifies three distinct types of startup with dif- ferent underlying business models. The third article aims to understand the role of a firm’s value architecture during the socio-technical transition process of Arti- ficial Intelligence. It identifies three distinct ways in which Artificial Intelligence startups create a shared understanding of the technology. The last article exam- ines how corporate venture capital units configure value-adding services for their venture portfolios. It derives a taxonomy of different corporate venture capital types, driven by different strategic motivations. Ultimately, this dissertation provides novel empirical insights into how a firm’s value architecture determines it’s role within a wider system of actors and how that role enables the firm to facilitate innovation. In that way, it contributes to both business model and innovation management literature. KW - Innovationmanagment KW - Emerging Technologies KW - Business Model KW - Artificial Intelligence KW - Blockchain KW - Ecosystem Y1 - 2019 ER -