TY - JOUR A1 - Korte, Andreas A1 - Tiberius, Victor A1 - Brem, Alexander T1 - Internet of Things (IoT) technology research in business and management literature BT - results from a co-citation analysis JF - Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research N2 - In coherence with the progressive digitalization of all areas of life, the Internet of Things (IoT) is a flourishing concept in both research and practice. Due to the increasing scholarly attention, the literature landscape has become scattered and fragmented. With a focus on the commercial application of the IoT and corresponding research, we employ a co-citation analysis and literature review to structure the field. We find and describe 19 research themes. To consolidate the extant research, we propose a research framework, which is based on a theoretical implementation process of IoT as a concept, specific IoT applications, or architectures integrated in an adapted input–process–output model. The main variables of the model are an initial definition and conceptualization of an IoT concept (input), which goes through an evaluation process (process), before it is implemented and can have an impact in practice (output). The paper contributes to interdisciplinary research relating to a business and management perspective on IoT by providing a holistic overview of predominant research themes and an integrative research framework. KW - bibliometric analysis KW - business KW - co-citation analysis KW - Internet of Things KW - IoT KW - management Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16060116 SN - 0718-1876 VL - 16 IS - 6 SP - 2073 EP - 2090 PB - MPDI CY - Basel ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Tiberius, Victor A1 - Hauptmeijer, Raoul T1 - Equity crowdfunding BT - Forecasting market development, platform evolution, and regulation JF - Journal of small business management : advancing small business management and entrepreneurship research worldwide / published on behalf of the International Council for Small Business N2 - In this study, we explore the development of equity crowdfunding (ECF) over the next 5 to 10 years by conducting an international Delphi study. Our results indicate that the ECF market is expected to grow significantly. However, it is unlikely to disrupt other forms of financing and will not cover all SME financing needs. ECF will remain a funding technique for SMEs and small investors; it is unlikely to attract large corporations or institutional investors. Platforms will impose stricter requirements for capital raisers, expand their services, and innovate their business models. National governments will probably partly liberalize the ECF market. KW - Equity crowdfunding KW - entrepreneurial finance KW - regulation KW - small KW - business KW - startup funding Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2020.1849714 SN - 0047-2778 SN - 1540-627X VL - 59 IS - 2 SP - 337 EP - 369 PB - Taylor & Francis Group CY - London ER - TY - GEN A1 - Tiberius, Victor A1 - Rietz, Meike A1 - Bouncken, Ricarda B. T1 - Performance analysis and science mapping of institutional entrepreneurship research T2 - Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe N2 - Institutional entrepreneurship comprises the activities of agents who disrupt existing social institutions or create new ones, often to enable diffusion, especially of radical innovations, in a market. The increased interest in institutional entrepreneurship has produced a large number of scholarly publications, especially in the last five years. As a consequence, the literature landscape is somewhat complex and scattered. We aim to compile a quantitative overview of the field within business and management research by conducting bibliometric performance analyses and science mappings. We identified the most productive and influential journals, authors, and articles with the highest impact. We found that institutional entrepreneurship has stronger ties to organization studies than to entrepreneurship research. Additionally, a large body of literature at the intersection of institutions and entrepreneurship does not refer to institutional entrepreneurship theory. The science mappings revealed a distinction between theoretical and conceptual research on one hand and applied and empirical research on the other hand. Research clusters reflect the structure–agency problem by focusing on the change agent’s goals and interests, strategies, and specific implementation mechanisms, as well as the relevance of public agents for existing institutions, and a more abstract process rather than agency view. T3 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe - 145 KW - institutional entrepreneurship KW - entrepreneurship KW - institutional change KW - bibliometric analysis KW - science mapping KW - co-citation analysis KW - co-occurrence analysis KW - business KW - management Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-525092 SN - 1867-5808 IS - 3 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Tiberius, Victor A1 - Rietz, Meike A1 - Bouncken, Ricarda B. T1 - Performance analysis and science mapping of institutional entrepreneurship research JF - Administrative Sciences N2 - Institutional entrepreneurship comprises the activities of agents who disrupt existing social institutions or create new ones, often to enable diffusion, especially of radical innovations, in a market. The increased interest in institutional entrepreneurship has produced a large number of scholarly publications, especially in the last five years. As a consequence, the literature landscape is somewhat complex and scattered. We aim to compile a quantitative overview of the field within business and management research by conducting bibliometric performance analyses and science mappings. We identified the most productive and influential journals, authors, and articles with the highest impact. We found that institutional entrepreneurship has stronger ties to organization studies than to entrepreneurship research. Additionally, a large body of literature at the intersection of institutions and entrepreneurship does not refer to institutional entrepreneurship theory. The science mappings revealed a distinction between theoretical and conceptual research on one hand and applied and empirical research on the other hand. Research clusters reflect the structure–agency problem by focusing on the change agent’s goals and interests, strategies, and specific implementation mechanisms, as well as the relevance of public agents for existing institutions, and a more abstract process rather than agency view. KW - institutional entrepreneurship KW - entrepreneurship KW - institutional change KW - bibliometric analysis KW - science mapping KW - co-citation analysis KW - co-occurrence analysis KW - business KW - management Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10030069 VL - 10 IS - 3 PB - MDPI CY - Basel ER -