TY - JOUR A1 - Pathiraja, Sahani Darschika A1 - Anghileri, Daniela A1 - Burlando, P. A1 - Sharma, A. A1 - Marshall, L. A1 - Moradkhani, H. T1 - Insights on the impact of systematic model errors on data assimilation performance in changing catchments JF - Advances in water resources N2 - The global prevalence of rapid and extensive land use change necessitates hydrologic modelling methodologies capable of handling non-stationarity. This is particularly true in the context of Hydrologic Forecasting using Data Assimilation. Data Assimilation has been shown to dramatically improve forecast skill in hydrologic and meteorological applications, although such improvements are conditional on using bias-free observations and model simulations. A hydrologic model calibrated to a particular set of land cover conditions has the potential to produce biased simulations when the catchment is disturbed. This paper sheds new light on the impacts of bias or systematic errors in hydrologic data assimilation, in the context of forecasting in catchments with changing land surface conditions and a model calibrated to pre-change conditions. We posit that in such cases, the impact of systematic model errors on assimilation or forecast quality is dependent on the inherent prediction uncertainty that persists even in pre-change conditions. Through experiments on a range of catchments, we develop a conceptual relationship between total prediction uncertainty and the impacts of land cover changes on the hydrologic regime to demonstrate how forecast quality is affected when using state estimation Data Assimilation with no modifications to account for land cover changes. This work shows that systematic model errors as a result of changing or changed catchment conditions do not always necessitate adjustments to the modelling or assimilation methodology, for instance through re-calibration of the hydrologic model, time varying model parameters or revised offline/online bias estimation. Y1 - 2017 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.12.006 SN - 0309-1708 SN - 1872-9657 VL - 113 SP - 202 EP - 222 PB - Elsevier CY - Oxford ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Pathiraja, Sahani Darschika A1 - Anghileri, Daniela A1 - Burlando, Paolo A1 - Sharma, Ashish A1 - Marshall, Lucy A1 - Moradkhani, Hamid T1 - Time-varying parameter models for catchments with land use change BT - the importance of model structure JF - Hydrology and earth system sciences : HESS N2 - Rapid population and economic growth in Southeast Asia has been accompanied by extensive land use change with consequent impacts on catchment hydrology. Modeling methodologies capable of handling changing land use conditions are therefore becoming ever more important and are receiving increasing attention from hydrologists. A recently developed data-assimilation-based framework that allows model parameters to vary through time in response to signals of change in observations is considered for a medium-sized catchment (2880 km(2)) in northern Vietnam experiencing substantial but gradual land cover change. We investigate the efficacy of the method as well as the importance of the chosen model structure in ensuring the success of a time-varying parameter method. The method was used with two lumped daily conceptual models (HBV and HyMOD) that gave good-quality streamflow predictions during pre-change conditions. Although both time-varying parameter models gave improved streamflow predictions under changed conditions compared to the time-invariant parameter model, persistent biases for low flows were apparent in the HyMOD case. It was found that HyMOD was not suited to representing the modified baseflow conditions, resulting in extreme and unrealistic time-varying parameter estimates. This work shows that the chosen model can be critical for ensuring the time-varying parameter framework successfully models streamflow under changing land cover conditions. It can also be used to determine whether land cover changes (and not just meteorological factors) contribute to the observed hydrologic changes in retrospective studies where the lack of a paired control catchment precludes such an assessment. Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2903-2018 SN - 1027-5606 SN - 1607-7938 VL - 22 IS - 5 SP - 2903 EP - 2919 PB - Copernicus CY - Göttingen ER -