TY - JOUR A1 - Jeltsch, Florian A1 - Blaum, Niels A1 - Brose, Ulrich A1 - Chipperfield, Joseph D. A1 - Clough, Yann A1 - Farwig, Nina A1 - Geissler, Katja A1 - Graham, Catherine H. A1 - Grimm, Volker A1 - Hickler, Thomas A1 - Huth, Andreas A1 - May, Felix A1 - Meyer, Katrin M. A1 - Pagel, Jörn A1 - Reineking, Björn A1 - Rillig, Matthias C. A1 - Shea, Katriona A1 - Schurr, Frank Martin A1 - Schroeder, Boris A1 - Tielbörger, Katja A1 - Weiss, Lina A1 - Wiegand, Kerstin A1 - Wiegand, Thorsten A1 - Wirth, Christian A1 - Zurell, Damaris T1 - How can we bring together empiricists and modellers in functional biodiversity research? JF - Basic and applied ecology : Journal of the Gesellschaft für Ökologie N2 - Improving our understanding of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning and our capacity to inform ecosystem management requires an integrated framework for functional biodiversity research (FBR). However, adequate integration among empirical approaches (monitoring and experimental) and modelling has rarely been achieved in FBR. We offer an appraisal of the issues involved and chart a course towards enhanced integration. A major element of this path is the joint orientation towards the continuous refinement of a theoretical framework for FBR that links theory testing and generalization with applied research oriented towards the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. We further emphasize existing decision-making frameworks as suitable instruments to practically merge these different aims of FBR and bring them into application. This integrated framework requires joint research planning, and should improve communication and stimulate collaboration between modellers and empiricists, thereby overcoming existing reservations and prejudices. The implementation of this integrative research agenda for FBR requires an adaptation in most national and international funding schemes in order to accommodate such joint teams and their more complex structures and data needs. KW - Biodiversity theory KW - Biodiversity experiments KW - Conservation management KW - Decision-making KW - Ecosystem functions and services KW - Forecasting KW - Functional traits KW - Global change KW - Monitoring programmes KW - Interdisciplinarity Y1 - 2013 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2013.01.001 SN - 1439-1791 VL - 14 IS - 2 SP - 93 EP - 101 PB - Elsevier CY - Jena ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kissling, W. D. A1 - Dormann, Carsten F. A1 - Groeneveld, Juergen A1 - Hickler, Thomas A1 - Kühn, Ingolf A1 - McInerny, Greg J. A1 - Montoya, Jose M. A1 - Römermann, Christine A1 - Schiffers, Katja A1 - Schurr, Frank Martin A1 - Singer, Alexander A1 - Svenning, Jens-Christian A1 - Zimmermann, Niklaus E. A1 - O'Hara, Robert B. T1 - Towards novel approaches to modelling biotic interactions in multispecies assemblages at large spatial extents JF - Journal of biogeography N2 - Aim Biotic interactions within guilds or across trophic levels have widely been ignored in species distribution models (SDMs). This synthesis outlines the development of species interaction distribution models (SIDMs), which aim to incorporate multispecies interactions at large spatial extents using interaction matrices. Location Local to global. Methods We review recent approaches for extending classical SDMs to incorporate biotic interactions, and identify some methodological and conceptual limitations. To illustrate possible directions for conceptual advancement we explore three principal ways of modelling multispecies interactions using interaction matrices: simple qualitative linkages between species, quantitative interaction coefficients reflecting interaction strengths, and interactions mediated by interaction currencies. We explain methodological advancements for static interaction data and multispecies time series, and outline methods to reduce complexity when modelling multispecies interactions. Results Classical SDMs ignore biotic interactions and recent SDM extensions only include the unidirectional influence of one or a few species. However, novel methods using error matrices in multivariate regression models allow interactions between multiple species to be modelled explicitly with spatial co-occurrence data. If time series are available, multivariate versions of population dynamic models can be applied that account for the effects and relative importance of species interactions and environmental drivers. These methods need to be extended by incorporating the non-stationarity in interaction coefficients across space and time, and are challenged by the limited empirical knowledge on spatio-temporal variation in the existence and strength of species interactions. Model complexity may be reduced by: (1) using prior ecological knowledge to set a subset of interaction coefficients to zero, (2) modelling guilds and functional groups rather than individual species, and (3) modelling interaction currencies and species effect and response traits. Main conclusions There is great potential for developing novel approaches that incorporate multispecies interactions into the projection of species distributions and community structure at large spatial extents. Progress can be made by: (1) developing statistical models with interaction matrices for multispecies co-occurrence datasets across large-scale environmental gradients, (2) testing the potential and limitations of methods for complexity reduction, and (3) sampling and monitoring comprehensive spatio-temporal data on biotic interactions in multispecies communities. KW - Community ecology KW - ecological networks KW - global change KW - guild assembly KW - multidimensional complexity KW - niche theory KW - prediction KW - species distribution model KW - species interactions KW - trait-based community modules Y1 - 2012 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02663.x SN - 0305-0270 VL - 39 IS - 12 SP - 2163 EP - 2178 PB - Wiley-Blackwell CY - Hoboken ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Radchuk, Viktoriia A1 - Reed, Thomas A1 - Teplitsky, Celine A1 - van de Pol, Martijn A1 - Charmantier, Anne A1 - Hassall, Christopher A1 - Adamik, Peter A1 - Adriaensen, Frank A1 - Ahola, Markus P. A1 - Arcese, Peter A1 - Miguel Aviles, Jesus A1 - Balbontin, Javier A1 - Berg, Karl S. A1 - Borras, Antoni A1 - Burthe, Sarah A1 - Clobert, Jean A1 - Dehnhard, Nina A1 - de Lope, Florentino A1 - Dhondt, Andre A. A1 - Dingemanse, Niels J. A1 - Doi, Hideyuki A1 - Eeva, Tapio A1 - Fickel, Jörns A1 - Filella, Iolanda A1 - Fossoy, Frode A1 - Goodenough, Anne E. A1 - Hall, Stephen J. G. A1 - Hansson, Bengt A1 - Harris, Michael A1 - Hasselquist, Dennis A1 - Hickler, Thomas A1 - Jasmin Radha, Jasmin A1 - Kharouba, Heather A1 - Gabriel Martinez, Juan A1 - Mihoub, Jean-Baptiste A1 - Mills, James A. A1 - Molina-Morales, Mercedes A1 - Moksnes, Arne A1 - Ozgul, Arpat A1 - Parejo, Deseada A1 - Pilard, Philippe A1 - Poisbleau, Maud A1 - Rousset, Francois A1 - Rödel, Mark-Oliver A1 - Scott, David A1 - Carlos Senar, Juan A1 - Stefanescu, Constanti A1 - Stokke, Bard G. A1 - Kusano, Tamotsu A1 - Tarka, Maja A1 - Tarwater, Corey E. A1 - Thonicke, Kirsten A1 - Thorley, Jack A1 - Wilting, Andreas A1 - Tryjanowski, Piotr A1 - Merila, Juha A1 - Sheldon, Ben C. A1 - Moller, Anders Pape A1 - Matthysen, Erik A1 - Janzen, Fredric A1 - Dobson, F. Stephen A1 - Visser, Marcel E. A1 - Beissinger, Steven R. A1 - Courtiol, Alexandre A1 - Kramer-Schadt, Stephanie T1 - Adaptive responses of animals to climate change are most likely insufficient JF - Nature Communications N2 - Biological responses to climate change have been widely documented across taxa and regions, but it remains unclear whether species are maintaining a good match between phenotype and environment, i.e. whether observed trait changes are adaptive. Here we reviewed 10,090 abstracts and extracted data from 71 studies reported in 58 relevant publications, to assess quantitatively whether phenotypic trait changes associated with climate change are adaptive in animals. A meta-analysis focussing on birds, the taxon best represented in our dataset, suggests that global warming has not systematically affected morphological traits, but has advanced phenological traits. We demonstrate that these advances are adaptive for some species, but imperfect as evidenced by the observed consistent selection for earlier timing. Application of a theoretical model indicates that the evolutionary load imposed by incomplete adaptive responses to ongoing climate change may already be threatening the persistence of species. Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10924-4 SN - 2041-1723 VL - 10 PB - Nature Publ. Group CY - London ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Svenning, Jens-Christian A1 - Gravel, Dominique A1 - Holt, Robert D. A1 - Schurr, Frank Martin A1 - Thuiller, Wilfried A1 - Muenkemueller, Tamara A1 - Schiffers, Katja H. A1 - Dullinger, Stefan A1 - Edwards, Thomas C. A1 - Hickler, Thomas A1 - Higgins, Steven I. A1 - Nabel, Julia E. M. S. A1 - Pagel, Jörn A1 - Normand, Signe T1 - The influence of interspecific interactions on species range expansion rates JF - Ecography : pattern and diversity in ecology ; research papers forum Y1 - 2014 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00574.x SN - 0906-7590 SN - 1600-0587 VL - 37 IS - 12 SP - 1198 EP - 1209 PB - Wiley-Blackwell CY - Hoboken ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Thuiller, Wilfried A1 - Albert, Cécile H. A1 - Araújo, Miguel B. A1 - Berry, Pam M. A1 - Cabeza, Mar A1 - Guisan, Antoine A1 - Hickler, Thomas A1 - Midgley, Guy F. A1 - Paterson, James A1 - Schurr, Frank Martin A1 - Sykes, Martin T. A1 - Zimmermann, Niklaus E. T1 - Predicting global change impacts on plant species' distributions : future challenges Y1 - 2008 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2007.09.004 SN - 1433-8319 ER -