TY - JOUR A1 - Aguado, Felicidad A1 - Cabalar, Pedro A1 - Fandinno, Jorge A1 - Pearce, David A1 - Perez, Gilberto A1 - Vidal, Concepcion T1 - Forgetting auxiliary atoms in forks JF - Artificial intelligence N2 - In this work we tackle the problem of checking strong equivalence of logic programs that may contain local auxiliary atoms, to be removed from their stable models and to be forbidden in any external context. We call this property projective strong equivalence (PSE). It has been recently proved that not any logic program containing auxiliary atoms can be reformulated, under PSE, as another logic program or formula without them – this is known as strongly persistent forgetting. In this paper, we introduce a conservative extension of Equilibrium Logic and its monotonic basis, the logic of Here-and-There, in which we deal with a new connective ‘|’ we call fork. We provide a semantic characterisation of PSE for forks and use it to show that, in this extension, it is always possible to forget auxiliary atoms under strong persistence. We further define when the obtained fork is representable as a regular formula. KW - Answer set programming KW - Non-monotonic reasoning KW - Equilibrium logic KW - Denotational semantics KW - Forgetting KW - Strong equivalence Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2019.07.005 SN - 0004-3702 SN - 1872-7921 VL - 275 SP - 575 EP - 601 PB - Elsevier CY - Amsterdam ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Aguado, Felicidad A1 - Cabalar, Pedro A1 - Fandiño, Jorge A1 - Pearce, David A1 - Perez, Gilberto A1 - Vidal-Peracho, Concepcion T1 - Revisiting Explicit Negation in Answer Set Programming JF - Theory and practice of logic programming KW - Answer set programming KW - Non-monotonic reasoning KW - Equilibrium logic KW - Explicit negation Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1017/S1471068419000267 SN - 1471-0684 SN - 1475-3081 VL - 19 IS - 5-6 SP - 908 EP - 924 PB - Cambridge Univ. Press CY - New York ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Banbara, Mutsunori A1 - Inoue, Katsumi A1 - Kaufmann, Benjamin A1 - Okimoto, Tenda A1 - Schaub, Torsten H. A1 - Soh, Takehide A1 - Tamura, Naoyuki A1 - Wanko, Philipp T1 - teaspoon BT - solving the curriculum-based course timetabling problems with answer set programming JF - Annals of operation research N2 - Answer Set Programming (ASP) is an approach to declarative problem solving, combining a rich yet simple modeling language with high performance solving capacities. We here develop an ASP-based approach to curriculum-based course timetabling (CB-CTT), one of the most widely studied course timetabling problems. The resulting teaspoon system reads a CB-CTT instance of a standard input format and converts it into a set of ASP facts. In turn, these facts are combined with a first-order encoding for CB-CTT solving, which can subsequently be solved by any off-the-shelf ASP systems. We establish the competitiveness of our approach by empirically contrasting it to the best known bounds obtained so far via dedicated implementations. Furthermore, we extend the teaspoon system to multi-objective course timetabling and consider minimal perturbation problems. KW - Educational timetabling KW - Course timetabling KW - Answer set programming KW - Multi-objective optimization KW - Minimal perturbation problems Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2757-7 SN - 0254-5330 SN - 1572-9338 VL - 275 IS - 1 SP - 3 EP - 37 PB - Springer CY - Dordrecht ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Bobda, Christophe A1 - Yonga, Franck A1 - Gebser, Martin A1 - Ishebabi, Harold A1 - Schaub, Torsten H. T1 - High-level synthesis of on-chip multiprocessor architectures based on answer set programming JF - Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing N2 - We present a system-level synthesis approach for heterogeneous multi-processor on chip, based on Answer Set Programming(ASP). Starting with a high-level description of an application, its timing constraints and the physical constraints of the target device, our goal is to produce the optimal computing infrastructure made of heterogeneous processors, peripherals, memories and communication components. Optimization aims at maximizing speed, while minimizing chip area. Also, a scheduler must be produced that fulfills the real-time requirements of the application. Even though our approach will work for application specific integrated circuits, we have chosen FPGA as target device in this work because of their reconfiguration capabilities which makes it possible to explore several design alternatives. This paper addresses the bottleneck of problem representation size by providing a direct and compact ASP encoding for automatic synthesis that is semantically equivalent to previously established ILP and ASP models. We describe a use-case in which designers specify their applications in C/C++ from which optimum systems can be derived. We demonstrate the superiority of our approach toward existing heuristics and exact methods with synthesis results on a set of realistic case studies. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. KW - System design KW - Architecture synthesis KW - Answer set programming KW - Multi-objective optimization KW - Technology mapping KW - Reconfigurable architecture Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpdc.2018.02.010 SN - 0743-7315 SN - 1096-0848 VL - 117 SP - 161 EP - 179 PB - Elsevier CY - San Diego ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Breitenreiter, Anselm A1 - Andjelković, Marko A1 - Schrape, Oliver A1 - Krstić, Miloš T1 - Fast error propagation probability estimates by answer set programming and approximate model counting JF - IEEE Access N2 - We present a method employing Answer Set Programming in combination with Approximate Model Counting for fast and accurate calculation of error propagation probabilities in digital circuits. By an efficient problem encoding, we achieve an input data format similar to a Verilog netlist so that extensive preprocessing is avoided. By a tight interconnection of our application with the underlying solver, we avoid iterating over fault sites and reduce calls to the solver. Several circuits were analyzed with varying numbers of considered cycles and different degrees of approximation. Our experiments show, that the runtime can be reduced by approximation by a factor of 91, whereas the error compared to the exact result is below 1%. KW - Circuit faults KW - Integrated circuit modeling KW - Programming KW - Analytical models KW - Search problems KW - Flip-flops KW - Encoding KW - Answer set programming KW - approximate model counting KW - error propagation KW - radhard design KW - reliability analysis KW - selective fault tolerance KW - single event upsets Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3174564 SN - 2169-3536 VL - 10 SP - 51814 EP - 51825 PB - Inst. of Electr. and Electronics Engineers CY - Piscataway ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Delgrande, James A1 - Schaub, Torsten H. A1 - Tompits, Hans A1 - Woltran, Stefan T1 - A model-theoretic approach to belief change in answer set programming JF - ACM transactions on computational logic N2 - We address the problem of belief change in (nonmonotonic) logic programming under answer set semantics. Our formal techniques are analogous to those of distance-based belief revision in propositional logic. In particular, we build upon the model theory of logic programs furnished by SE interpretations, where an SE interpretation is a model of a logic program in the same way that a classical interpretation is a model of a propositional formula. Hence we extend techniques from the area of belief revision based on distance between models to belief change in logic programs. We first consider belief revision: for logic programs P and Q, the goal is to determine a program R that corresponds to the revision of P by Q, denoted P * Q. We investigate several operators, including (logic program) expansion and two revision operators based on the distance between the SE models of logic programs. It proves to be the case that expansion is an interesting operator in its own right, unlike in classical belief revision where it is relatively uninteresting. Expansion and revision are shown to satisfy a suite of interesting properties; in particular, our revision operators satisfy all or nearly all of the AGM postulates for revision. We next consider approaches for merging a set of logic programs, P-1,...,P-n. Again, our formal techniques are based on notions of relative distance between the SE models of the logic programs. Two approaches are examined. The first informally selects for each program P-i those models of P-i that vary the least from models of the other programs. The second approach informally selects those models of a program P-0 that are closest to the models of programs P-1,...,P-n. In this case, P-0 can be thought of as a set of database integrity constraints. We examine these operators with regards to how they satisfy relevant postulate sets. Last, we present encodings for computing the revision as well as the merging of logic programs within the same logic programming framework. This gives rise to a direct implementation of our approach in terms of off-the-shelf answer set solvers. These encodings also reflect the fact that our change operators do not increase the complexity of the base formalism. KW - Theory KW - Answer set programming KW - belief revision KW - belief merging KW - program encodings KW - strong equivalence Y1 - 2013 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1145/2480759.2480766 SN - 1529-3785 VL - 14 IS - 2 PB - Association for Computing Machinery CY - New York ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Fichte, Johannes Klaus A1 - Szeider, Stefan T1 - Backdoors to tractable answer set programming JF - Artificial intelligence N2 - Answer Set Programming (ASP) is an increasingly popular framework for declarative programming that admits the description of problems by means of rules and constraints that form a disjunctive logic program. In particular, many Al problems such as reasoning in a nonmonotonic setting can be directly formulated in ASP. Although the main problems of ASP are of high computational complexity, complete for the second level of the Polynomial Hierarchy, several restrictions of ASP have been identified in the literature, under which ASP problems become tractable. In this paper we use the concept of backdoors to identify new restrictions that make ASP problems tractable. Small backdoors are sets of atoms that represent "clever reasoning shortcuts" through the search space and represent a hidden structure in the problem input. The concept of backdoors is widely used in theoretical investigations in the areas of propositional satisfiability and constraint satisfaction. We show that it can be fruitfully adapted to ASP. We demonstrate how backdoors can serve as a unifying framework that accommodates several tractable restrictions of ASP known from the literature. Furthermore, we show how backdoors allow us to deploy recent algorithmic results from parameterized complexity theory to the domain of answer set programming. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. KW - Answer set programming KW - Backdoors KW - Computational complexity KW - Parameterized complexity KW - Kernelization Y1 - 2015 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2014.12.001 SN - 0004-3702 SN - 1872-7921 VL - 220 SP - 64 EP - 103 PB - Elsevier CY - Amsterdam ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Gebser, Martin A1 - Kaufmann, Benjamin A1 - Kaminski, Roland A1 - Ostrowski, Max A1 - Schaub, Torsten H. A1 - Schneider, Marius T1 - Potassco the Potsdam answer set solving collection JF - AI communications : AICOM ; the European journal on artificial intelligence N2 - This paper gives an overview of the open source project Potassco, the Potsdam Answer Set Solving Collection, bundling tools for Answer Set Programming developed at the University of Potsdam. KW - Answer set programming KW - declarative problem solving Y1 - 2011 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3233/AIC-2011-0491 SN - 0921-7126 VL - 24 IS - 2 SP - 107 EP - 124 PB - IOS Press CY - Amsterdam ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Gebser, Martin A1 - Kaufmann, Benjamin A1 - Schaub, Torsten H. T1 - Conflict-driven answer set solving: From theory to practice JF - Artificial intelligence N2 - We introduce an approach to computing answer sets of logic programs, based on concepts successfully applied in Satisfiability (SAT) checking. The idea is to view inferences in Answer Set Programming (ASP) as unit propagation on nogoods. This provides us with a uniform constraint-based framework capturing diverse inferences encountered in ASP solving. Moreover, our approach allows us to apply advanced solving techniques from the area of SAT. As a result, we present the first full-fledged algorithmic framework for native conflict-driven ASP solving. Our approach is implemented in the ASP solver clasp that has demonstrated its competitiveness and versatility by winning first places at various solver contests. KW - Answer set programming KW - Logic programming KW - Nonmonotonic reasoning Y1 - 2012 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2012.04.001 SN - 0004-3702 VL - 187 IS - 8 SP - 52 EP - 89 PB - Elsevier CY - Amsterdam ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Hecher, Markus T1 - Treewidth-aware reductions of normal ASP to SAT BT - is normal ASP harder than SAT after all? JF - Artificial intelligence N2 - Answer Set Programming (ASP) is a paradigm for modeling and solving problems for knowledge representation and reasoning. There are plenty of results dedicated to studying the hardness of (fragments of) ASP. So far, these studies resulted in characterizations in terms of computational complexity as well as in fine-grained insights presented in form of dichotomy-style results, lower bounds when translating to other formalisms like propositional satisfiability (SAT), and even detailed parameterized complexity landscapes. A generic parameter in parameterized complexity originating from graph theory is the socalled treewidth, which in a sense captures structural density of a program. Recently, there was an increase in the number of treewidth-based solvers related to SAT. While there are translations from (normal) ASP to SAT, no reduction that preserves treewidth or at least keeps track of the treewidth increase is known. In this paper we propose a novel reduction from normal ASP to SAT that is aware of the treewidth, and guarantees that a slight increase of treewidth is indeed sufficient. Further, we show a new result establishing that, when considering treewidth, already the fragment of normal ASP is slightly harder than SAT (under reasonable assumptions in computational complexity). This also confirms that our reduction probably cannot be significantly improved and that the slight increase of treewidth is unavoidable. Finally, we present an empirical study of our novel reduction from normal ASP to SAT, where we compare treewidth upper bounds that are obtained via known decomposition heuristics. Overall, our reduction works better with these heuristics than existing translations. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. KW - Answer set programming KW - Treewidth KW - Parameterized complexity KW - Complexity KW - analysis KW - Tree decomposition KW - Treewidth-aware reductions Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2021.103651 SN - 0004-3702 SN - 1872-7921 VL - 304 PB - Elsevier CY - Amsterdam ER -