TY  - JOUR
A1  - Petersen, Hans-Georg
A1  - Müller, Klaus
T1  - Towards a reformulation of the role of the tax and social state in the polish transformation process
Y1  - 1995
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Wiggering, Hubert
A1  - Dalchow, Claus
A1  - Glemnitz, Michael
A1  - Helming, Katharina
A1  - Müller, Klaus
A1  - Schultz, Alfred
A1  - Stachow, Ulrich
A1  - Zander, Peter
T1  - Indicators for multifunctional land use : linking socio-economic requirements with landscape potentials
N2  - Indicators to assess sustainable land development often focus on either economic or ecologic aspects of landscape use. The concept of multifunctional land use helps merging those two focuses by emphasising on the rule that economic action is per se accompanied by ecological utility: commodity outputs (CO, e.g., yields) are paid for on the market, but non-commodity outputs (NCO, e.g., landscape aesthetics) so far are public goods with no markets. Agricultural production schemes often provided both outputs by joint production, but with technical progress under prevailing economic pressure, joint production increasingly vanishes by decoupling of commodity from non-commodity production. Simultaneously, by public and political awareness of these shortcomings, there appears a societal need or even demand for some non-commodity outputs of land use, which induces a market potential, and thus, shift towards the status of a commodity outputs. An approach is presented to merge both types of output by defining an indicator of social utility (SUMLU): production schemes are considered with respect to social utility of both commodity and non-commodity outputs. Social utility in this sense includes environmental and economic services as long as society expresses a demand for them. For each combination of parameters at specific frame conditions (e.g., soil and climate properties of a landscape) a production possibility curve can reflect trade-offs between commodity and non-commodity outputs. On each production possibility curve a welfare optimum can be identified expressing the highest achievable value of social utility as a trade-off between CO and NCO production. When applying more parameters, a cluster of welfare optimums is generated. Those clusters can be used for assessing production schemes with respect to sustainable land development. Examples of production possibility functions are given on easy applicable parameters (nitrogen leaching versus gross margin) and on more complex ones (biotic integrity). Social utility, thus allows to evaluate sustainability of land development in a cross-sectoral approach with respect to multifunctionality. (C) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
Y1  - 2006
UR  - 1960 = DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.08.014
ER  - 
TY  - CHAP
A1  - Petersen, Hans-Georg
A1  - Müller, Klaus
A1  - Hüther, Michael
A1  - Sowada, Christoph
A1  - Christev, Atanas
A1  - FitzRoy, Felix
T1  - Taxes, transfers, economic efficiency and social justice : essays on public economics 1979 – 2009. - Chapter 4: Economics of transformation
N2  - This volume contains the articles and papers which predominately have been published in international journals or edited volumes in the period from 1979 to 2009. The single articles reflect the main research areas of the editor and his co-authors who were engaged at the Kiel Institute of World Economics, the Johannes-Kepler-University Linz/Austria, the Justus- Liebig-University Giessen, the University of Potsdam, and the German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin).
Y1  - 2011
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-50400
ER  - 
TY  - CHAP
A1  - Petersen, Hans-Georg
A1  - Hinterberger, Friedrich
A1  - Müller, Klaus
T1  - Taxes, transfers, economic efficiency and social justice : essays on public economics 1979 – 2009. - Chapter 1: Redistribution – theory and measurement
N2  - This volume contains the articles and papers which predominately have been published in international journals or edited volumes in the period from 1979 to 2009. The single articles reflect the main research areas of the editor and his co-authors who were engaged at the Kiel Institute of World Economics, the Johannes-Kepler-University Linz/Austria, the Justus- Liebig-University Giessen, the University of Potsdam, and the German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin).
Y1  - 2011
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-50379
ER  -