TY - GEN A1 - Demmerling, Christoph A1 - Krüger, Hans-Peter A1 - Habermas, Jürgen T1 - Communicative Reason Juergen Habermas, interviewed by Christoph Demmerling and Hans-Peter Krueger T2 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie : Zweimonatsschrift der internationalen philosophischen Forschung N2 - Jurgen Habermas explicates the concept of communicative reason. He explains the key assumptions of the philosophy of language and social theory associated with this concept. Also discussed is the category of life-world and the role of the body-mind difference for the consciousness of exclusivity in our access to subjective experience. as well as the role of emotions and perceptions in the context of a theory of communicative action. The question of the redemption of the various validity claims as they are associated with the performance of speech acts is related to processes of social learning and to the role of negative experiences. Finally the interview deals with the relationship between religion and reason and the importance of religion in modern, post-secular societies. Questions about the philosophical culture of our present times are discussed at the end of the conversation. KW - Jurgen Habermas KW - communicative action KW - communicative reason KW - critical theory KW - life-world KW - religion KW - post-secular society Y1 - 2016 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1515/dzph-2016-0061 SN - 0012-1045 SN - 2192-1482 VL - 64 SP - 806 EP - 827 PB - De Gruyter CY - Berlin ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Krüger, Hans-Peter T1 - Critical Anthropology? To the Relationship between Philosophical Anthropology and Critical Theory JF - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie : Zweimonatsschrift der internationalen philosophischen Forschung N2 - This article compares Max Horkheimer’s and Theodor W. Adorno’s foundation of the Frankfurt Critical Theory with Helmuth Plessner’s foundation of Philosophical Anthropology. While Horkheimer’s and Plessner’s paradigms are mutually incompatible, Adorno’s „negative dialectics“ and Plessner’s „negative anthropology“ (G. Gamm) can be seen as complementing one another. Jürgen Habermas at one point sketched a complementary relationship between his own publicly communicative theory of modern society and Plessner’s philosophy of nature and human expressivity, and though he then came to doubt this, he later reaffirmed it. Faced with the „life power“ in „high capitalism“ (Plessner), the ambitions for a public democracy in a pluralistic society have to be broadened from an argumentative focus (Habermas) to include the human condition and the expressive modes of our experience as essentially embodied persons. The article discusses some possible aspects of this complementarity under the title of a „critical anthropology“ (H. Schnädelbach). KW - negativity KW - bio-power KW - social critique KW - human condition KW - world and subject KW - human expressivity Y1 - 2016 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1515/dzph-2016-0041 SN - 0012-1045 SN - 2192-1482 VL - 64 SP - 553 EP - 580 PB - De Gruyter CY - Berlin ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Krüger, Hans-Peter T1 - Grenzen aus Sicht der Philosophischen Anthropologie Helmuth Plessners T2 - Grenzen im Fokus der Wissenschaften Y1 - 2016 SP - 101 EP - 120 PB - Trafo CY - Berlin ER - TY - GEN A1 - Krüger, Hans-Peter A1 - Demmerling, Christoph A1 - Habermas, Jürgen T1 - Kommunikative Vernunft T1 - Communicative Reason BT - Jürgen Habermas, interviewt von Christoph Demmerling und Hans-Peter Krüger BT - Juergen Habermas, interviewed by Christoph Demmerling and Hans-Peter Krueger T2 - Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe N2 - Jürgen Habermas explicates the concept of communicative reason. He explains the key assumptions of the philosophy of language and social theory associated with this concept. Also discussed is the category of life-world and the role of the body-mind difference for the consciousness of exclusivity in our access to subjective experience. as well as the role of emotions and perceptions in the context of a theory of communicative action. The question of the redemption of the various validity claims as they are associated with the performance of speech acts is related to processes of social learning and to the role of negative experiences. Finally the interview deals with the relationship between religion and reason and the importance of religion in modern, post-secular societies. Questions about the philosophical culture of our present times are discussed at the end of the conversation. T3 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe - 125 KW - Jürgen Habermas KW - communicative action KW - communicative reason KW - critical theory KW - life-world KW - religion KW - post-secular society Y1 - 2017 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-397848 SN - 1866-8380 IS - 125 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Krüger, Hans-Peter T1 - Kritische Anthropologie? T1 - Critical Anthropology? BT - Zum Verhältnis zwischen Philosophischer Anthropologie und Kritischer Theorie BT - To the Relationship between Philosophical Anthropology and Critical Theory T2 - Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe N2 - This article compares Max Horkheimer’s and Theodor W. Adorno’s foundation of the Frankfurt Critical Theory with Helmuth Plessner’s foundation of Philosophical Anthropology. While Horkheimer’s and Plessner’s paradigms are mutually incompatible, Adorno’s „negative dialectics“ and Plessner’s „negative anthropology“ (G. Gamm) can be seen as complementing one another. Jürgen Habermas at one point sketched a complementary relationship between his own publicly communicative theory of modern society and Plessner’s philosophy of nature and human expressivity, and though he then came to doubt this, he later reaffirmed it. Faced with the „life power“ in „high capitalism“ (Plessner), the ambitions for a public democracy in a pluralistic society have to be broadened from an argumentative focus (Habermas) to include the human condition and the expressive modes of our experience as essentially embodied persons. The article discusses some possible aspects of this complementarity under the title of a „critical anthropology“ (H. Schnädelbach) T3 - Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe - 127 KW - negativity KW - bio-power KW - social critique KW - human condition KW - world and subject KW - human expressivity Y1 - 2017 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-398024 SN - 1866-8380 IS - 127 ER -