TY - JOUR A1 - Thieken, Annegret A1 - Mohor, Guilherme Samprogna A1 - Kreibich, Heidi A1 - Müller, Meike T1 - Compound inland flood events BT - different pathways, different impacts and different coping options JF - Natural hazards and earth system sciences : NHESS N2 - Several severe flood events hit Germany in recent years, with events in 2013 and 2016 being the most destructive ones, although dynamics and flood processes were very different. While the 2013 event was a slowly rising widespread fluvial flood accompanied by some severe dike breaches, the events in 2016 were fast-onset pluvial floods, which resulted in surface water flooding in some places due to limited capacities of the drainage systems and in destructive flash floods with high sediment loads and clogging in others, particularly in small steep catchments. Hence, different pathways, i.e. different routes that the water takes to reach (and potentially damage) receptors, in our case private households, can be identified in both events. They can thus be regarded as spatially compound flood events or compound inland floods. This paper analyses how differently affected residents coped with these different flood types (fluvial and pluvial) and their impacts while accounting for the different pathways (river flood, dike breach, surface water flooding and flash flood) within the compound events. The analyses are based on two data sets with 1652 (for the 2013 flood) and 601 (for the 2016 flood) affected residents who were surveyed around 9 months after each flood, revealing little socio-economic differences - except for income - between the two samples. The four pathways showed significant differences with regard to their hydraulic and financial impacts, recovery, warning processes, and coping and adaptive behaviour. There are just small differences with regard to perceived self-efficacy and responsibility, offering entry points for tailored risk communication and support to improve property-level adaptation. Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-165-2022 SN - 1561-8633 SN - 1684-9981 VL - 22 IS - 1 SP - 165 EP - 185 PB - Copernicus CY - Göttingen ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Rözer, Viktor A1 - Kreibich, Heidi A1 - Schröter, Kai A1 - Müller, Meike A1 - Sairam, Nivedita A1 - Doss-Gollin, James A1 - Lall, Upmanu A1 - Merz, Bruno T1 - Probabilistic Models Significantly Reduce Uncertainty in Hurricane Harvey Pluvial Flood Loss Estimates JF - Earths future N2 - Pluvial flood risk is mostly excluded in urban flood risk assessment. However, the risk of pluvial flooding is a growing challenge with a projected increase of extreme rainstorms compounding with an ongoing global urbanization. Considered as a flood type with minimal impacts when rainfall rates exceed the capacity of urban drainage systems, the aftermath of rainfall-triggered flooding during Hurricane Harvey and other events show the urgent need to assess the risk of pluvial flooding. Due to the local extent and small-scale variations, the quantification of pluvial flood risk requires risk assessments on high spatial resolutions. While flood hazard and exposure information is becoming increasingly accurate, the estimation of losses is still a poorly understood component of pluvial flood risk quantification. We use a new probabilistic multivariable modeling approach to estimate pluvial flood losses of individual buildings, explicitly accounting for the associated uncertainties. Except for the water depth as the common most important predictor, we identified the drivers for having loss or not and for the degree of loss to be different. Applying this approach to estimate and validate building structure losses during Hurricane Harvey using a property level data set, we find that the reliability and dispersion of predictive loss distributions vary widely depending on the model and aggregation level of property level loss estimates. Our results show that the use of multivariable zero-inflated beta models reduce the 90% prediction intervalsfor Hurricane Harvey building structure loss estimates on average by 78% (totalling U.S.$3.8 billion) compared to commonly used models. KW - pluvial flooding KW - loss modeling KW - urban flooding KW - probabilistic KW - Hurricane Harvey KW - climate change adaptation Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF001074 SN - 2328-4277 VL - 7 IS - 4 SP - 384 EP - 394 PB - American Geophysical Union CY - Washington ER -