TY - JOUR A1 - Aarts, Alexander A. A1 - Anderson, Joanna E. A1 - Anderson, Christopher J. A1 - Attridge, Peter R. A1 - Attwood, Angela A1 - Axt, Jordan A1 - Babel, Molly A1 - Bahnik, Stepan A1 - Baranski, Erica A1 - Barnett-Cowan, Michael A1 - Bartmess, Elizabeth A1 - Beer, Jennifer A1 - Bell, Raoul A1 - Bentley, Heather A1 - Beyan, Leah A1 - Binion, Grace A1 - Borsboom, Denny A1 - Bosch, Annick A1 - Bosco, Frank A. A1 - Bowman, Sara D. A1 - Brandt, Mark J. A1 - Braswell, Erin A1 - Brohmer, Hilmar A1 - Brown, Benjamin T. A1 - Brown, Kristina A1 - Bruening, Jovita A1 - Calhoun-Sauls, Ann A1 - Callahan, Shannon P. A1 - Chagnon, Elizabeth A1 - Chandler, Jesse A1 - Chartier, Christopher R. A1 - Cheung, Felix A1 - Christopherson, Cody D. A1 - Cillessen, Linda A1 - Clay, Russ A1 - Cleary, Hayley A1 - Cloud, Mark D. A1 - Cohn, Michael A1 - Cohoon, Johanna A1 - Columbus, Simon A1 - Cordes, Andreas A1 - Costantini, Giulio A1 - Alvarez, Leslie D. Cramblet A1 - Cremata, Ed A1 - Crusius, Jan A1 - DeCoster, Jamie A1 - DeGaetano, Michelle A. A1 - Della Penna, Nicolas A1 - den Bezemer, Bobby A1 - Deserno, Marie K. A1 - Devitt, Olivia A1 - Dewitte, Laura A1 - Dobolyi, David G. A1 - Dodson, Geneva T. A1 - Donnellan, M. Brent A1 - Donohue, Ryan A1 - Dore, Rebecca A. A1 - Dorrough, Angela A1 - Dreber, Anna A1 - Dugas, Michelle A1 - Dunn, Elizabeth W. A1 - Easey, Kayleigh A1 - Eboigbe, Sylvia A1 - Eggleston, Casey A1 - Embley, Jo A1 - Epskamp, Sacha A1 - Errington, Timothy M. A1 - Estel, Vivien A1 - Farach, Frank J. A1 - Feather, Jenelle A1 - Fedor, Anna A1 - Fernandez-Castilla, Belen A1 - Fiedler, Susann A1 - Field, James G. A1 - Fitneva, Stanka A. A1 - Flagan, Taru A1 - Forest, Amanda L. A1 - Forsell, Eskil A1 - Foster, Joshua D. A1 - Frank, Michael C. A1 - Frazier, Rebecca S. A1 - Fuchs, Heather A1 - Gable, Philip A1 - Galak, Jeff A1 - Galliani, Elisa Maria A1 - Gampa, Anup A1 - Garcia, Sara A1 - Gazarian, Douglas A1 - Gilbert, Elizabeth A1 - Giner-Sorolla, Roger A1 - Glöckner, Andreas A1 - Göllner, Lars A1 - Goh, Jin X. A1 - Goldberg, Rebecca A1 - Goodbourn, Patrick T. A1 - Gordon-McKeon, Shauna A1 - Gorges, Bryan A1 - Gorges, Jessie A1 - Goss, Justin A1 - Graham, Jesse A1 - Grange, James A. A1 - Gray, Jeremy A1 - Hartgerink, Chris A1 - Hartshorne, Joshua A1 - Hasselman, Fred A1 - Hayes, Timothy A1 - Heikensten, Emma A1 - Henninger, Felix A1 - Hodsoll, John A1 - Holubar, Taylor A1 - Hoogendoorn, Gea A1 - Humphries, Denise J. A1 - Hung, Cathy O. -Y. A1 - Immelman, Nathali A1 - Irsik, Vanessa C. A1 - Jahn, Georg A1 - Jaekel, Frank A1 - Jekel, Marc A1 - Johannesson, Magnus A1 - Johnson, Larissa G. A1 - Johnson, David J. A1 - Johnson, Kate M. A1 - Johnston, William J. A1 - Jonas, Kai A1 - Joy-Gaba, Jennifer A. A1 - Kappes, Heather Barry A1 - Kelso, Kim A1 - Kidwell, Mallory C. A1 - Kim, Seung Kyung A1 - Kirkhart, Matthew A1 - Kleinberg, Bennett A1 - Knezevic, Goran A1 - Kolorz, Franziska Maria A1 - Kossakowski, Jolanda J. A1 - Krause, Robert Wilhelm A1 - Krijnen, Job A1 - Kuhlmann, Tim A1 - Kunkels, Yoram K. A1 - Kyc, Megan M. A1 - Lai, Calvin K. A1 - Laique, Aamir A1 - Lakens, Daniel A1 - Lane, Kristin A. A1 - Lassetter, Bethany A1 - Lazarevic, Ljiljana B. A1 - LeBel, Etienne P. A1 - Lee, Key Jung A1 - Lee, Minha A1 - Lemm, Kristi A1 - Levitan, Carmel A. A1 - Lewis, Melissa A1 - Lin, Lin A1 - Lin, Stephanie A1 - Lippold, Matthias A1 - Loureiro, Darren A1 - Luteijn, Ilse A1 - Mackinnon, Sean A1 - Mainard, Heather N. A1 - Marigold, Denise C. A1 - Martin, Daniel P. A1 - Martinez, Tylar A1 - Masicampo, E. J. A1 - Matacotta, Josh A1 - Mathur, Maya A1 - May, Michael A1 - Mechin, Nicole A1 - Mehta, Pranjal A1 - Meixner, Johannes A1 - Melinger, Alissa A1 - Miller, Jeremy K. A1 - Miller, Mallorie A1 - Moore, Katherine A1 - Möschl, Marcus A1 - Motyl, Matt A1 - Müller, Stephanie M. A1 - Munafo, Marcus A1 - Neijenhuijs, Koen I. A1 - Nervi, Taylor A1 - Nicolas, Gandalf A1 - Nilsonne, Gustav A1 - Nosek, Brian A. A1 - Nuijten, Michele B. A1 - Olsson, Catherine A1 - Osborne, Colleen A1 - Ostkamp, Lutz A1 - Pavel, Misha A1 - Penton-Voak, Ian S. A1 - Perna, Olivia A1 - Pernet, Cyril A1 - Perugini, Marco A1 - Pipitone, R. Nathan A1 - Pitts, Michael A1 - Plessow, Franziska A1 - Prenoveau, Jason M. A1 - Rahal, Rima-Maria A1 - Ratliff, Kate A. A1 - Reinhard, David A1 - Renkewitz, Frank A1 - Ricker, Ashley A. A1 - Rigney, Anastasia A1 - Rivers, Andrew M. A1 - Roebke, Mark A1 - Rutchick, Abraham M. A1 - Ryan, Robert S. A1 - Sahin, Onur A1 - Saide, Anondah A1 - Sandstrom, Gillian M. A1 - Santos, David A1 - Saxe, Rebecca A1 - Schlegelmilch, Rene A1 - Schmidt, Kathleen A1 - Scholz, Sabine A1 - Seibel, Larissa A1 - Selterman, Dylan Faulkner A1 - Shaki, Samuel A1 - Simpson, William B. A1 - Sinclair, H. Colleen A1 - Skorinko, Jeanine L. M. A1 - Slowik, Agnieszka A1 - Snyder, Joel S. A1 - Soderberg, Courtney A1 - Sonnleitner, Carina A1 - Spencer, Nick A1 - Spies, Jeffrey R. A1 - Steegen, Sara A1 - Stieger, Stefan A1 - Strohminger, Nina A1 - Sullivan, Gavin B. A1 - Talhelm, Thomas A1 - Tapia, Megan A1 - te Dorsthorst, Anniek A1 - Thomae, Manuela A1 - Thomas, Sarah L. A1 - Tio, Pia A1 - Traets, Frits A1 - Tsang, Steve A1 - Tuerlinckx, Francis A1 - Turchan, Paul A1 - Valasek, Milan A1 - Van Aert, Robbie A1 - van Assen, Marcel A1 - van Bork, Riet A1 - van de Ven, Mathijs A1 - van den Bergh, Don A1 - van der Hulst, Marije A1 - van Dooren, Roel A1 - van Doorn, Johnny A1 - van Renswoude, Daan R. A1 - van Rijn, Hedderik A1 - Vanpaemel, Wolf A1 - Echeverria, Alejandro Vasquez A1 - Vazquez, Melissa A1 - Velez, Natalia A1 - Vermue, Marieke A1 - Verschoor, Mark A1 - Vianello, Michelangelo A1 - Voracek, Martin A1 - Vuu, Gina A1 - Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan A1 - Weerdmeester, Joanneke A1 - Welsh, Ashlee A1 - Westgate, Erin C. A1 - Wissink, Joeri A1 - Wood, Michael A1 - Woods, Andy A1 - Wright, Emily A1 - Wu, Sining A1 - Zeelenberg, Marcel A1 - Zuni, Kellylynn T1 - Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science JF - Science N2 - Reproducibility is a defining feature of science, but the extent to which it characterizes current research is unknown. We conducted replications of 100 experimental and correlational studies published in three psychology journals using high-powered designs and original materials when available. Replication effects were half the magnitude of original effects, representing a substantial decline. Ninety-seven percent of original studies had statistically significant results. Thirty-six percent of replications had statistically significant results; 47% of original effect sizes were in the 95% confidence interval of the replication effect size; 39% of effects were subjectively rated to have replicated the original result; and if no bias in original results is assumed, combining original and replication results left 68% with statistically significant effects. Correlational tests suggest that replication success was better predicted by the strength of original evidence than by characteristics of the original and replication teams. Y1 - 2015 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716 SN - 1095-9203 SN - 0036-8075 VL - 349 IS - 6251 PB - American Assoc. for the Advancement of Science CY - Washington ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Abraham, Charles A1 - Krahé, Barbara A1 - Dominic, Robert A1 - Fritsche, Immo T1 - Do health promotion messages target cognitive and behavioural correlates of condom use? : a content analysis of safer sex promotion leaflets in two countries Y1 - 2002 SN - 1359-107X ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Adam, Jos J. A1 - Bovend'Eerdt, Thamar J. H. A1 - van Dooren, Fleur E. P. A1 - Fischer, Martin H. A1 - Pratt, Jay T1 - The closer the better hand proximity dynamically affects letter recognition accuracy JF - Attention, perception, & psychophysics : AP&P ; a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc. N2 - A growing literature has suggested that processing of visual information presented near the hands is facilitated. In this study, we investigated whether the near-hands superiority effect also occurs with the hands moving. In two experiments, participants performed a cyclical bimanual movement task requiring concurrent visual identification of briefly presented letters. For both the static and dynamic hand conditions, the results showed improved letter recognition performance with the hands closer to the stimuli. The finding that the encoding advantage for near-hand stimuli also occurred with the hands moving suggests that the effect is regulated in real time, in accordance with the concept of a bimodal neural system that dynamically updates hand position in external space. KW - Perception and action Y1 - 2012 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-012-0339-3 SN - 1943-3921 VL - 74 IS - 7 SP - 1533 EP - 1538 PB - Springer CY - New York ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Adam, Maurits A1 - Elsner, Birgit T1 - The impact of salient action effects on 6-, 7-, and 11-month-olds’ goal-predictive gaze shifts for a human grasping action JF - PLOS ONE N2 - When infants observe a human grasping action, experience-based accounts predict that all infants familiar with grasping actions should be able to predict the goal regardless of additional agency cues such as an action effect. Cue-based accounts, however, suggest that infants use agency cues to identify and predict action goals when the action or the agent is not familiar. From these accounts, we hypothesized that younger infants would need additional agency cues such as a salient action effect to predict the goal of a human grasping action, whereas older infants should be able to predict the goal regardless of agency cues. In three experiments, we presented 6-, 7-, and 11-month-olds with videos of a manual grasping action presented either with or without an additional salient action effect (Exp. 1 and 2), or we presented 7-month-olds with videos of a mechanical claw performing a grasping action presented with a salient action effect (Exp. 3). The 6-month-olds showed tracking gaze behavior, and the 11-month-olds showed predictive gaze behavior, regardless of the action effect. However, the 7-month-olds showed predictive gaze behavior in the action-effect condition, but tracking gaze behavior in the no-action-effect condition and in the action-effect condition with a mechanical claw. The results therefore support the idea that salient action effects are especially important for infants' goal predictions from 7 months on, and that this facilitating influence of action effects is selective for the observation of human hands. KW - attention KW - eye movements KW - infants perception KW - mechanisms KW - origins Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240165 SN - 1932-6203 VL - 15 IS - 10 PB - Public Library of Science CY - San Fransisco ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Adam, Maurits A1 - Elsner, Birgit T1 - Action effects foster 11-month-olds’ prediction of action goals for a non-human agent JF - Infant behavior & development : an international and interdisciplinary journal N2 - Action effects have been stated to be important for infants’ processing of goal-directed actions. In this study, 11-month-olds showed equally fast predictive gaze shifts to a claw’s action goal when the grasping action was presented either with three agency cues (self-propelled movement, equifinality of goal achievement and a salient action effect) or with only a salient action effect, but infants showed tracking gaze when the claw showed only self-propelled movement and equifinality of goal achievement. The results suggest that action effects, compared to purely kinematic cues, seem to be especially important for infants' online processing of goal-directed actions. KW - Infancy KW - Eye tracking KW - Goal anticipation KW - Action effects KW - Agency cues Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2018.09.002 SN - 0163-6383 SN - 1879-0453 VL - 53 SP - 49 EP - 55 PB - Elsevier CY - New York ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Adam, Maurits A1 - Gumbsch, Christian A1 - Butz, Martin V. A1 - Elsner, Birgit T1 - The impact of action effects on infants’ predictive gaze shifts for a non-human grasping action at 7, 11, and 18 months JF - Frontiers in psychology N2 - During the observation of goal-directed actions, infants usually predict the goal at an earlier age when the agent is familiar (e.g., human hand) compared to unfamiliar (e.g., mechanical claw). These findings implicate a crucial role of the developing agentive self for infants' processing of others' action goals. Recent theoretical accounts suggest that predictive gaze behavior relies on an interplay between infants' agentive experience (top-down processes) and perceptual information about the agent and the action-event (bottom-up information; e.g., agency cues). The present study examined 7-, 11-, and 18-month-old infants' predictive gaze behavior for a grasping action performed by an unfamiliar tool, depending on infants' age-related action knowledge about tool-use and the display of the agency cue of producing a salient action effect. The results are in line with the notion of a systematic interplay between experience-based top-down processes and cue-based bottom-up information: Regardless of the salient action effect, predictive gaze shifts did not occur in the 7-month-olds (least experienced age group), but did occur in the 18-month-olds (most experienced age group). In the 11-month-olds, however, predictive gaze shifts occurred only when a salient action effect was presented. This sheds new light on how the developing agentive self, in interplay with available agency cues, supports infants' action-goal prediction also for observed tool-use actions. KW - infancy KW - predictive gaze behavior KW - eye tracking KW - tool-use actions KW - agency cues KW - developing agentive self KW - non-human grasping Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.695550 SN - 1664-1078 VL - 12 PB - Frontiers Research Foundation CY - Lausanne ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Adam, Maurits A1 - Reitenbach, Ivanina A1 - Elsner, Birgit T1 - Agency cues and 11-month-olds’ and adults’ anticipation of action goals JF - Cognitive Development N2 - For the processing of goal-directed actions, some accounts emphasize the importance of experience with the action or the agent. Other accounts stress the importance of agency cues. We investigated the impact of agency cues on 11-month-olds’ and adults’ goal anticipation for a grasping-action performed by a mechanical claw. With an eyetracker, we measured anticipations in two conditions, where the claw was displayed either with or without agency cues. In two experiments, 11-month-olds were predictive when agency cues were present, but reactive when no agency cues were presented. Adults were predictive in both conditions. Furthermore, 11-month-olds rapidly learned to predict the goal in the agency condition, but not in the mechanical condition. Adults’ predictions did not change across trials in the agency condition, but decelerated in the mechanical condition. Thus, agency cues and own action experience are important for infants’ and adults’ online processing of goal-directed actions by non-human agents. KW - Infants KW - Eyetracking KW - Action processing KW - Anticipatory gaze shifts KW - Agency Y1 - 2017 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.02.008 SN - 0885-2014 SN - 1879-226X VL - 43 SP - 37 EP - 48 PB - Elsevier CY - New York ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Adam, Maurits A1 - Reitenbach, Ivanina A1 - Papenmeier, Frank A1 - Gredebäck, Gustaf A1 - Elsner, Claudia A1 - Elsner, Birgit T1 - actions, but not for mechanical claws JF - Meteoritics & planetary science : journal of the Meteoritical Society N2 - Previous research indicates that infants’ prediction of the goals of observed actions is influenced by own experience with the type of agent performing the action (i.e., human hand vs. non-human agent) as well as by action-relevant features of goal objects (e.g., object size). The present study investigated the combined effects of these factors on 12-month-olds’ action prediction. Infants’ (N = 49) goal-directed gaze shifts were recorded as they observed 14 trials in which either a human hand or a mechanical claw reached for a small goal area (low-saliency goal) or a large goal area (high-saliency goal). Only infants who had observed the human hand reaching for a high-saliency goal fixated the goal object ahead of time, and they rapidly learned to predict the action goal across trials. By contrast, infants in all other conditions did not track the observed action in a predictive manner, and their gaze shifts to the action goal did not change systematically across trials. Thus, high-saliency goals seem to boost infants’ predictive gaze shifts during the observation of human manual actions, but not of actions performed by a mechanical device. This supports the assumption that infants’ action predictions are based on interactive effects of action-relevant object features (e.g., size) and own action experience. KW - Infancy KW - Goal saliency KW - Anticipatory gaze shifts KW - Eye tracking KW - Action processing Y1 - 2016 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2016.05.001 SN - 0163-6383 SN - 1879-0453 VL - 44 SP - 29 EP - 37 PB - Elsevier CY - New York ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Adamo, Nicoletta A1 - Baumeister, Sarah A1 - Hohmann, Sarah A1 - Wolf, Isabella A1 - Holz, Nathalie A1 - Boecker-Schlier, Regina A1 - Laucht, Manfred A1 - Banaschewski, Tobias A1 - Brandeis, Daniel T1 - Frequency-specific coupling between trial-to-trial fluctuations of neural responses and response-time variability JF - Journal of neural transmission N2 - We assessed intra-individual variability of response times (RT) and single-trial P3 amplitudes following targets in healthy adults during a Flanker/NO-GO task. RT variability and variability of the neural responses coupled at the faster frequencies examined (0.07-0.17 Hz) at Pz, the target-P3 maxima, despite non-significant associations for overall variability (standard deviation, SD). Frequency-specific patterns of variability in the single-trial P3 may help to understand the neurophysiology of RT variability and its explanatory models of attention allocation deficits beyond intra-individual variability summary indices such as SD. KW - Intra-individual response-time variability KW - Event-related potential KW - Cognitive control KW - Attention deficit Y1 - 2015 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-015-1382-8 SN - 0300-9564 SN - 1435-1463 VL - 122 IS - 8 SP - 1197 EP - 1202 PB - Springer CY - Wien ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Albrecht, Jessica A1 - Anzinger, Andrea A1 - Kopietz, Rainer A1 - Schöpf, Veronika A1 - Kleemann, Anna Maria A1 - Pollatos, Olga A1 - Wiesmann, Martin T1 - Test-retest reliability of the olfactory detection threshold test of the Sniffin' Sticks N2 - The aim of the present study was to investigate the test-retest reliability of the olfactory detection threshold subtest of the Sniffin" Sticks test battery, if administered repeatedly on 4 time points. The detection threshold test was repeatedly conducted in 64 healthy subjects. On the first testing session, the threshold test was accomplished 3 times (T(1) = 0 min, T(2) = 35 min, and T(3) = 105 min), representing a short-term testing. A fourth threshold test was conducted on a second testing session (T(4) = 35.1 days after the first testing session), representing a long-term testing. The average scores for olfactory detection threshold for n-butanol did not differ significantly across the 4 points of time. The test-retest reliability (Pearson"s r) between the 4 time points of threshold testing were in a range of 0.43-0.85 (P < 0.01). These results support the notion that the olfactory detection threshold test is a highly reliable method for repeated olfactory testing, even if the test is repeated more than once per day and over a long-term period. It is concluded that the olfactory detection threshold test of the Sniffin" Sticks is suitable for repeated testing during experimental or clinical studies. Y1 - 2008 UR - http://chemse.oxfordjournals.org/ SN - 0379-864X ER -