TY  - JOUR
A1  - Melliger, Marc André
A1  - Lilliestam, Johan
T1  - Effects of coordinating support policy changes on renewable power investor choices in Europe
JF  - Energy policy : the international journal of the political, economic, planning, environmental and social aspects of energy
N2  - The economic context for renewable power in Europe is shifting: feed-in tariffs are replaced by auctioned premiums as the main support schemes. As renewables approach competitiveness, political pressure mounts to phase out support, whereas some other actors perceive a need for continued fixed-price support. We investigate how the phase-out of support or the reintroduction of feed-in tariffs would affect investors' choices for renewables through a conjoint analysis. In particular, we analyse the impact of coordination - the simultaneousness - of policy changes across countries and technologies. We find that investment choices are not strongly affected if policy changes are coordinated and returns unaffected. However, if policy changes are uncoordinated, investments shift to still supported - less mature and costlier - technologies or countries where support remains or is reintroduced. This shift is particularly strong for large investors and could potentially skew the European power mix towards an over-reliance on a single, less mature technology or specific generation region, resulting in a more expensive power system. If European countries want to change their renewable power support policies, and especially if they phase out support and expose renewables to market competition, it is important that they coordinate their actions.
KW  - Policy change
KW  - Policy coordination
KW  - Renewable energy
KW  - Investment
KW  - decision
KW  - Choice experiment
KW  - Adaptive conjoint analysis
Y1  - 2021
U6  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111993
SN  - 0301-4215
VL  - 148
PB  - Elsevier
CY  - Oxford
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Jensen, Carsten
A1  - Knill, Christoph
A1  - Schulze, Kai
A1  - Tosun, Jale
T1  - Giving less by doing more? Dynamics of social policy expansion and dismantling in 18 OECD countries
JF  - Journal of European public policy
N2  - Protection against social risks is generally popular among voters and should enjoy the benefits of institutional inertia. Yet retrenchment occurs rather frequently in advanced welfare states without this systematically leading to electoral punishment. We solve this paradox by, first, arguing that governments can avoid the blame of retrenchment by pursuing a strategy of expansionary dismantling' where new policies and instruments are used to compensate reform losers and to obfuscate cutbacks. Second, we test our argument with a huge new dataset consisting of changes in unemployment legislation and replacement rates in 18 OECD countries from 1976 to 2000. The statistical tests provide robust support for our argument, suggesting that the introduction of new policies and instruments leads to cutbacks in replacement rates. We also find that left-leaning governments are least likely to engage in expansionary dismantling.
KW  - Policy change
KW  - policy dismantling
KW  - social policy
KW  - welfare state retrenchment
Y1  - 2014
U6  - https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.866262
SN  - 1350-1763
SN  - 1466-4429
VL  - 21
IS  - 4
SP  - 528
EP  - 548
PB  - Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
CY  - Abingdon
ER  -