TY - JOUR A1 - Rolf, Werner A1 - Pauleit, Stephan A1 - Wiggering, Hubert T1 - A stakeholder approach, door opener for farmland and multifunctionality in urban green infrastructure JF - Urban forestry & urban greening N2 - During the last years Urban Green Infrastructure (UGI) has evolved as a research focus across Europe. UGI can be understood as a multifunctional network of different urban green spaces and elements contributing to urban benefits. Urban agriculture has gained increasing research interest in this context. While a strong focus has been made on functions and benefits of small scale activities, the question is still open, whether these findings can be up-scaled and transferred to the farmland scale. Furthermore, multifunctionality of urban and peri-urban agriculture is rarely being considered in the landscape context. This research aims to address these gaps and harnesses the question if agricultural landscapes – which in many European metropolitan regions provide significant spatial potential – can contribute to UGI as multifunctional green spaces. This work considers multifunctionality qualitatively based on stakeholder opinion, using a participatory research approach. This study provides new insights in peri-urban farmland potentials for UGI development, resulting into a strategy framework. Furthermore, it reflects on the role of the stakeholder involvement for `multifunctionality planning´. It suggests that it helps to define meaningful bundles of intertwined functions that interact on different scales, helping to deal with non-linearity of multiple functions and to better manage them simultaneously. KW - Benefits KW - Functions KW - Green surge KW - Multifunctionality KW - Participation KW - Peri-urban agriculture KW - Stakeholder KW - Urban learning lab Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.07.012 SN - 1618-8667 VL - 40 SP - 73 EP - 83 PB - Urban & Fischer CY - Jena ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Weisshuhn, Peter A1 - Reckling, Moritz A1 - Stachow, Ulrich A1 - Wiggering, Hubert T1 - Supporting Agricultural Ecosystem Services through the Integration of Perennial Polycultures into Crop Rotations JF - Sustainability N2 - This review analyzes the potential role and long-term effects of field perennial polycultures (mixtures) in agricultural systems, with the aim of reducing the trade-offs between provisioning and regulating ecosystem services. First, crop rotations are identified as a suitable tool for the assessment of the long-term effects of perennial polycultures on ecosystem services, which are not visible at the single-crop level. Second, the ability of perennial polycultures to support ecosystem services when used in crop rotations is quantified through eight agricultural ecosystem services. Legume-grass mixtures and wildflower mixtures are used as examples of perennial polycultures, and compared with silage maize as a typical crop for biomass production. Perennial polycultures enhance soil fertility, soil protection, climate regulation, pollination, pest and weed control, and landscape aesthetics compared with maize. They also score lower for biomass production compared with maize, which confirms the trade-off between provisioning and regulating ecosystem services. However, the additional positive factors provided by perennial polycultures, such as reduced costs for mineral fertilizer, pesticides, and soil tillage, and a significant preceding crop effect that increases the yields of subsequent crops, should be taken into account. However, a full assessment of agricultural ecosystem services requires a more holistic analysis that is beyond the capabilities of current frameworks. KW - agroecosystem KW - assessment KW - legume-grass mixture KW - wildflower mixture KW - perennial crop KW - mixed cropping Y1 - 2017 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122267 SN - 2071-1050 VL - 9 PB - MDPI CY - Basel ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Albert, Christian A1 - Schroeter-Schlaack, Christoph A1 - Hansjuergens, Bernd A1 - Dehnhardt, Alexandra A1 - Doering, Ralf A1 - Job, Hubert A1 - Koeppel, Johann A1 - Kraetzig, Sebastian A1 - Matzdorf, Bettina A1 - Reutter, Michaela A1 - Schaltegger, Stefan A1 - Scholz, Mathias A1 - Siegmund-Schultze, Marianna A1 - Wiggering, Hubert A1 - Woltering, Manuel A1 - von Haaren, Christina T1 - An economic perspective on land use decisions in agricultural landscapes: Insights from the TEEB Germany Study JF - Ecosystem Services : Science, Policy and Practice N2 - Agricultural landscapes safeguard ecosystem services (ES) and biodiversity upon which human well-being depends. However, only a fraction of these services are generally considered in land management decisions, resulting in trade-offs and societally inefficient solutions. The TEEB Study (The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity) spearheaded the development of assessments of the economic significance of ES and biodiversity. Several national TEEB follow-ups have compiled case studies and derived targeted policy advice. By synthesizing insights from "Natural Capital Germany - TEEB DE" and focusing on rural areas, the objectives of this study were (i) to explore causes of the continued decline of ES and biodiversity, (ii) to introduce case studies exemplifying the economic significance of ES and biodiversity in land use decisions, and (iii) to synthesize key recommendations for policy, planning and management. Our findings indicate that the continued decrease of ES and biodiversity in Germany can be explained by implementation deficits within a well-established nature conservation system. Three case studies on grassland protection, the establishment of riverbank buffer zones and water-sensitive farming illustrate that an economic perspective can convey recognition of the values of ES and biodiversity. We conclude with suggestions for enhanced consideration, improved conservation and sustainable use of ES and biodiversity. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Y1 - 2017 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.03.020 SN - 2212-0416 VL - 25 SP - 69 EP - 78 PB - Elsevier CY - Amsterdam ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Wiggering, Hubert A1 - Steinhardt, Uta T1 - A conceptual model for site-specific agricultural land-use JF - Ecological modelling : international journal on ecological modelling and engineering and systems ecolog N2 - Land-use concepts provide decision support for the most efficient usage options according to sustainable development and multifunctionality requirements. However, developments in landscape-related, agricultural production schemes are primarily driven by economic benefits. Therefore, most agricultural land-use concepts tackle particular problems or interests and lack a systemic perspective. As a result, we discuss a conceptual model for future site-specific agricultural land-use with an inbuilt requirement for adequate experimental sites to enable monitoring systems for a new generation of ecosystem models and for new approaches to address science-stakeholder interactions. KW - Site-specific agricultural land-use KW - Concept of differentiated land use KW - Sustainable land use KW - Multifunctionality KW - Modeling tools for decision-making Y1 - 2015 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.08.011 SN - 0304-3800 SN - 1872-7026 VL - 295 SP - 42 EP - 46 PB - Elsevier CY - Amsterdam ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Werner, Andrea A1 - Werner, Andreas A1 - Wieland, Ralf A1 - Kersebaum, Kurt-Christian A1 - Mirschel, Wilfried A1 - Ende, Hans-Peter A1 - Wiggering, Hubert T1 - Ex ante assessment of crop rotations focusing on energy crops using a multi-attribute decision-making method JF - Ecological indicators : integrating monitoring, assessment and management N2 - The cultivation of plants for use as energy resources is an agricultural and industrial sector with potentially synergistic benefits related to protecting the environment and generating income. Against the background of increasing land-use changes and new agricultural approaches to the production of energy crops, we present a method for identifying future-oriented crop rotations that supports both the economic and environmental components of decision-making strategies with respect to agriculture-related policy decisions (regional mission statements). The conflicting aspects of these objectives can be addressed with the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), a multi-attribute decision-making method that was integrated here. Three models are used to generate simulations of the defined objectives over a planning period of 30 years under the current climate scenario and provide input data for the multi-attribute assessment of several crop rotations. Based on the entire evaluation process, dimensionless global priority vectors are used to indicate how well the crop rotations meet the requirements of the defined mission statement. The method is tested in a municipality in NE Germany. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. KW - Agricultural management KW - Ex ante assessment KW - Multi-attribute decision-making KW - AHP KW - Crop rotation KW - Energy crops KW - Regional objectives KW - Indicators Y1 - 2014 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.03.013 SN - 1470-160X SN - 1872-7034 VL - 45 SP - 110 EP - 122 PB - Elsevier CY - Amsterdam ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Koenig, H. J. A1 - Zhen, L. A1 - Helming, K. A1 - Uthes, S. A1 - Yang, L. A1 - Cao, Xianyong A1 - Wiggering, Hubert T1 - Assessing the impact of the sloping land conversion programme on rural sustainability in Guyuan, Western China JF - Land degradation & development N2 - The goal of China's sloping land conversion programme (SLCP) is to combat soil erosion and to reduce rural poverty. An ex-ante assessment of possible SLCP impacts was conducted with a focus on rural sustainability, taking the drought-prone region of Guyuan in Western China as an example. The Framework for Participatory Impact Assessment (FoPIA) was used to conduct two complementary impact assessments, one assessing SLCP impacts at regional level and a second one assessing alternative forest management options, to explore possible trade-offs among the economic, social and environmental dimensions of sustainability. Regional stakeholders assessed the SLCP to be capable of reducing soil erosion but felt it negatively affected rural employment, and a further continuation of the Programme was advocated. Assessment of three forest management scenarios by scientists showed that an orientation towards energy forests is potentially beneficial to all three sustainability dimensions. Ecological forests had disproportionate positive impacts on environmental functions and adverse impact on the other two sustainability dimensions. Economic forests were assessed to serve primarily the economic and social sustainability dimensions, while environmental impacts were still tolerable. The FoPIA results were evaluated against the available literature on the SLCP. Overall, the assessment results appeared to be reasonable, but the results of the regional stakeholders appeared to be too optimistic compared with the more critical assessment of the scientists. The SLCP seems to have the potential to tackle soil erosion but requires integrated forest management to minimize the risk of water stress while contributing to economic and social benefits in Guyuan. Copyright (C) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. KW - land conversion KW - land use KW - afforestation KW - land use functions KW - Grain for Green Project KW - ex-ante impact assessment KW - sustainable development KW - stakeholder participation Y1 - 2014 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2164 SN - 1085-3278 SN - 1099-145X VL - 25 IS - 4 SP - 385 EP - 396 PB - Wiley-Blackwell CY - Hoboken ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Wiggering, Hubert T1 - The geology - land use - nexus JF - Environmental earth sciences KW - Multifunctionality KW - Site-adequate land use KW - Ecosystem services KW - Land use conception Y1 - 2014 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2908-8 SN - 1866-6280 SN - 1866-6299 VL - 71 IS - 12 SP - 5037 EP - 5044 PB - Springer CY - New York ER - TY - JOUR A1 - König, Hannes Jochen A1 - Uthes, Sandra A1 - Schuler, Johannes A1 - Zhen, Lin A1 - Purushothaman, Seema A1 - Suarma, Utia A1 - Sghaier, Mongi A1 - Makokha, Stella A1 - Helming, Katharina A1 - Sieber, Stefan A1 - Chen, Le A1 - Brouwer, Floor A1 - Morris, Jake A1 - Wiggering, Hubert T1 - Regional impact assessment of land use scenarios in developing countries using the FoPIA approach - findings from five case studies JF - Journal of environmental management N2 - The impact of land use changes on sustainable development is of increasing interest in many regions of the world. This study aimed to test the transferability of the Framework for Participatory Impact Assessment (FoPIA), which was originally developed in the European context, to developing countries, in which lack of data often prevents the use of data-driven impact assessment methods. The core aspect of FoPIA is the stakeholder-based assessment of alternative land use scenarios. Scenario impacts on regional sustainability are assessed by using a set of nine regional land use functions (LUFs), which equally cover the economic, social and environmental dimensions of sustainability. The cases analysed in this study include (1) the alternative spatial planning policies around the Merapi volcano and surrounding areas of Yogyakarta City, Indonesia; (2) the large-scale afforestation of agricultural areas to reduce soil erosion in Guyuan, China; (3) the expansion of soil and water conservation measures in the Oum Zessar watershed, Tunisia; (4) the agricultural intensification and the potential for organic agriculture in Bijapur, India; and (5) the land degradation and land conflicts resulting from land division and privatisation in Narok, Kenya. All five regions are characterised by population growth, partially combined with considerable economic development, environmental degradation problems and social conflicts. Implications of the regional scenario impacts as well as methodological aspects are discussed. Overall, FoPIA proved to be a useful tool for diagnosing regional human-environment interactions and for supporting the communication and social learning process among different stakeholder groups. KW - (Ex-ante) impact assessment KW - Land use change KW - Scenario study KW - Sustainable development KW - Stakeholder participation KW - Developing countries KW - Indicators Y1 - 2013 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.021 SN - 0301-4797 SN - 1095-8630 VL - 127 SP - S56 EP - S64 PB - Elsevier CY - London ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Wiggering, Hubert A1 - Dalchow, Claus A1 - Glemnitz, Michael A1 - Helming, Katharina A1 - Müller, Klaus A1 - Schultz, Alfred A1 - Stachow, Ulrich A1 - Zander, Peter T1 - Indicators for multifunctional land use : linking socio-economic requirements with landscape potentials N2 - Indicators to assess sustainable land development often focus on either economic or ecologic aspects of landscape use. The concept of multifunctional land use helps merging those two focuses by emphasising on the rule that economic action is per se accompanied by ecological utility: commodity outputs (CO, e.g., yields) are paid for on the market, but non-commodity outputs (NCO, e.g., landscape aesthetics) so far are public goods with no markets. Agricultural production schemes often provided both outputs by joint production, but with technical progress under prevailing economic pressure, joint production increasingly vanishes by decoupling of commodity from non-commodity production. Simultaneously, by public and political awareness of these shortcomings, there appears a societal need or even demand for some non-commodity outputs of land use, which induces a market potential, and thus, shift towards the status of a commodity outputs. An approach is presented to merge both types of output by defining an indicator of social utility (SUMLU): production schemes are considered with respect to social utility of both commodity and non-commodity outputs. Social utility in this sense includes environmental and economic services as long as society expresses a demand for them. For each combination of parameters at specific frame conditions (e.g., soil and climate properties of a landscape) a production possibility curve can reflect trade-offs between commodity and non-commodity outputs. On each production possibility curve a welfare optimum can be identified expressing the highest achievable value of social utility as a trade-off between CO and NCO production. When applying more parameters, a cluster of welfare optimums is generated. Those clusters can be used for assessing production schemes with respect to sustainable land development. Examples of production possibility functions are given on easy applicable parameters (nitrogen leaching versus gross margin) and on more complex ones (biotic integrity). Social utility, thus allows to evaluate sustainability of land development in a cross-sectoral approach with respect to multifunctionality. (C) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved Y1 - 2006 UR - 1960 = DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.08.014 ER -