TY - JOUR A1 - Coesfeld, Jacqueline A1 - Anderson, Sharolyn J. A1 - Baugh, Kimberly A1 - Elvidge, Christopher D. A1 - Schernthanner, Harald A1 - Kyba, Christopher C. M. T1 - Variation of Individual Location Radiance in VIIRS DNB Monthly Composite Images JF - Remote sensing N2 - With the growing size and use of night light time series from the Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite Day/Night Band (DNB), it is important to understand the stability of the dataset. All satellites observe differences in pixel values during repeat observations. In the case of night light data, these changes can be due to both environmental effects and changes in light emission. Here we examine the stability of individual locations of particular large scale light sources (e.g., airports and prisons) in the monthly composites of DNB data from April 2012 to September 2017. The radiances for individual pixels of most large light emitters are approximately normally distributed, with a standard deviation of typically 15-20% of the mean. Greenhouses and flares, however, are not stable sources. We observe geospatial autocorrelation in the monthly variations for nearby sites, while the correlation for sites separated by large distances is small. This suggests that local factors contribute most to the variation in the pixel radiances and furthermore that averaging radiances over large areas will reduce the total variation. A better understanding of the causes of temporal variation would improve the sensitivity of DNB to lighting changes. KW - artificial light at night KW - light pollution KW - night lights KW - VIIRS DNB Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10121964 SN - 2072-4292 VL - 10 IS - 12 PB - MDPI CY - Basel ER - TY - JOUR A1 - van Grunsven, Roy Hendrikus Antonius A1 - Jaehnichen, David A1 - Grubisic, Maja A1 - Hölker, Franz T1 - Slugs (Arionidae) benefit from nocturnal artificial illumination JF - Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological and Integrative Physiology N2 - Artificial illumination increases around the globe and this has been found to affect many groups of organisms and ecosystems. By manipulating nocturnal illumination using one large experimental field site with 24 streetlights and one dark control, we assessed the impact of artificial illumination on slugs over a period of 4 years. The number of slugs, primarily Arionidae, increased strongly in the illuminated site but not on the dark site. There are several nonexclusive explanations for this effect, including reduced predation and increased food quality in the form of carcasses of insects attracted by the light. As slugs play an important role in ecosystems and are also important pest species, the increase of slugs under artificial illumination cannot only affect ecosystem functioning but also have important economic consequences. KW - ALAN KW - Arionidae KW - gastropoda KW - light pollution KW - phototaxis Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.2170 SN - 2471-5646 VL - 329 IS - 8-9 SP - 429 EP - 433 PB - Wiley CY - Hoboken ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Eccard, Jana A1 - Scheffler, Ingo A1 - Franke, Steffen A1 - Hoffmann, Julia T1 - Off-grid BT - solar powered LED illumination impacts epigeal arthropods JF - Insect conservation and diversity N2 - 1. Advances in LED technology combined with solar, storable energy bring light to places remote from electricity grids. Worldwide more than 1.3 billion of people are living off-grid, often in developing regions of high insect biodiversity. In developed countries, dark refuges for wildlife are threatened by ornamental garden lights. Solar powered LEDs (SPLEDs) are cheaply available, dim, and often used to illuminate foot paths, but little is known on their effects on ground living (epigeal) arthropods. 2. We used off-the-shelf garden lamps with a single ‘white’ LED (colour temperature 7250 K) to experimentally investigate effects on attraction and nocturnal activity of ground beetles (Carabidae). 3. We found two disparate and species-specific effects of SPLEDs. (i) Some nocturnal, phototactic species were not reducing activity under illumination and were strongly attracted to lamps (>20-fold increase in captures compared to dark controls). Such species aggregate in lit areas and SPLEDs may become ecological traps, while the species is drawn from nearby, unlit assemblages. (ii) Other nocturnal species were reducing mobility and activity under illumination without being attracted to light, which may cause fitness reduction in lit areas. 4. Both reactions offer mechanistic explanations on how outdoor illumination can change population densities of specific predatory arthropods, which may have cascading effects on epigeal arthropod assemblages. The technology may thus increase the area of artificial light at night (ALAN) impacting insect biodiversity. 5. Measures are needed to mitigate effects, such as adjustment of light colour temperature and automated switch-offs. KW - Artificial light at night (ALAN) KW - Carabidae KW - illuminance KW - light pollution KW - light spectrum KW - nocturnal epigeal insect KW - phototaxis KW - solar powered light-emitting diode KW - spectral irradiance KW - white light Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12303 SN - 1752-458X SN - 1752-4598 VL - 11 IS - 6 SP - 600 EP - 607 PB - Wiley CY - Hoboken ER -